Prediction models in hernia repair: a systematic review.
Complex hernia repair
Hernia and radiology
Hernia radiology
Predictive models and hernia repair
Radiology and emergent hernia repair
Radiology and loss of domain
Radiology predictive models
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
14
09
2022
accepted:
19
12
2022
medline:
5
5
2023
pubmed:
4
1
2023
entrez:
3
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hernias can present with unique challenges when it comes to management and repair. Prediction models can be a useful tool for clinicians to better anticipate and understand the severity of a hernia, the type of surgical technique, or presurgical planning that may be required to treat the patient, and the risk of complications. Our goal is to evaluate and consolidate prediction models in hernia repair present in the literature for which physicians can reference to best improve patient outcomes and postoperative management. We performed a literature search in PubMed using keywords, "rectus width to defect width ratio," "predicting myofascial release," "computed tomography hernia repair prediction," "component separation radiology prediction hernia," "fat volume and hernia repair," "body morphometrics and Query hernia repair," "body morphometrics and reherniation," "computed tomography findings and risk of emergency hernia repair," "loss of domain and hernia radiology," and "volumetry and hernia repair." We searched for publications that used radiographic parameters to predict hernia severity, interventions, and outcomes. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we found twenty-three studies related to prediction models in hernia repair published between 2000 and 2021. We summarized studies pertaining to predicting acute care, predicting operative planning with loss of domain and component separation, predicting complications, paraesophageal hernia predictions, and predicting postoperative respiratory complications. Radiographic prediction models can be an objective and efficient way for surgeons to analyze hernias and better understand a patient's situation so that they can inform patients about the best treatment options and the risk of complications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Hernias can present with unique challenges when it comes to management and repair. Prediction models can be a useful tool for clinicians to better anticipate and understand the severity of a hernia, the type of surgical technique, or presurgical planning that may be required to treat the patient, and the risk of complications. Our goal is to evaluate and consolidate prediction models in hernia repair present in the literature for which physicians can reference to best improve patient outcomes and postoperative management.
METHODS
We performed a literature search in PubMed using keywords, "rectus width to defect width ratio," "predicting myofascial release," "computed tomography hernia repair prediction," "component separation radiology prediction hernia," "fat volume and hernia repair," "body morphometrics and Query hernia repair," "body morphometrics and reherniation," "computed tomography findings and risk of emergency hernia repair," "loss of domain and hernia radiology," and "volumetry and hernia repair." We searched for publications that used radiographic parameters to predict hernia severity, interventions, and outcomes.
RESULTS
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we found twenty-three studies related to prediction models in hernia repair published between 2000 and 2021. We summarized studies pertaining to predicting acute care, predicting operative planning with loss of domain and component separation, predicting complications, paraesophageal hernia predictions, and predicting postoperative respiratory complications.
CONCLUSION
Radiographic prediction models can be an objective and efficient way for surgeons to analyze hernias and better understand a patient's situation so that they can inform patients about the best treatment options and the risk of complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36595065
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09842-2
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09842-2
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3364-3379Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Docimo S Jr et al (2021) Health care disparity exists among those undergoing emergent hernia repairs in New York State. Hernia 25(3):775–780
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02244-0
pubmed: 32495046
Mueck KM et al (2017) Computed tomography findings associated with the risk for emergency ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 214(1):42–46
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.035
pubmed: 28277230
Kohga A et al (2021) Does preoperative enhanced CT predict requirement of intestinal resection in the patients with incarcerated myopectineal hernias containing small bowel? Hernia 25(5):1279–1287
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02325-0
pubmed: 33128678
Zhang J et al (2021) Prediction of bowel obstruction caused by obturator hernia using risk factor categories on clinical characteristics and multidetector computed tomographic findings. Abdom Radiol 46(9):4069–4078
doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02838-3
Tanaka EY et al (2010) A computerized tomography scan method for calculating the hernia sac and abdominal cavity volume in complex large incisional hernia with loss of domain. Hernia 14(1):63–69
doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0560-8
pubmed: 19756913
Martre P et al (2020) New, simple and reliable volumetric calculation technique in incisional hernias with loss of domain. Hernia 24(2):403–409
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01990-0
pubmed: 31218439
Al Sadairi AR et al (2021) A simplified method to evaluate the loss of domain. Hernia 26(3):927–936
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02474-w
pubmed: 34341871
Sabbagh C et al (2011) Peritoneal volume is predictive of tension-free fascia closure of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective study. Hernia 15(5):559–565
doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0832-y
pubmed: 21584816
Franklin BR et al (2013) Predicting abdominal closure after component separation for complex ventral hernias: maximizing the use of preoperative computed tomography. Ann Plast Surg 71(3):261–265
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182773915
pubmed: 23945530
Blair LJ et al (2015) Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res 199(2):420–427
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.033
pubmed: 26169031
Winters H et al (2019) Pre-operative CT scan measurements for predicting complications in patients undergoing complex ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique. Hernia 23(2):347–354
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01899-8
pubmed: 30847719
Al-Mansour MR et al (2021) Linear versus volumetric CT analysis in predicting tension-free fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 25(1):91–98
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02349-6
pubmed: 33389214
Love MW et al (2021) Computed tomography imaging in ventral hernia repair: can we predict the need for myofascial release? Hernia 25(2):471–477
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02181-y
pubmed: 32277369
Yurtkap Y et al (2021) Implementing preoperative Botulinum toxin A and progressive pneumoperitoneum through the use of an algorithm in giant ventral hernia repair. Hernia 25(2):389–398
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02226-2
pubmed: 32495050
Levi B et al (2014) Use of morphometric assessment of body composition to quantify risk of surgical-site infection in patients undergoing component separation ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(4):559e–566e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000009
pubmed: 24675208
Fueter T et al (2016) The hernia-neck-ratio (HNR), a novel predictive factor for complications of umbilical hernia. World J Surg 40(9):2084–2090
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3556-4
pubmed: 27194561
Rinaldi JM et al (2016) Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in patients with complex abdominal wall hernias. Am J Surg 212(5):903–911
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.03.003
pubmed: 27372146
Loftus TJ et al (2017) Computed tomography evidence of fluid in the hernia sac predicts surgical site infection following mesh repair of acutely incarcerated ventral and groin hernias. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83(1):170–174
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001503
pubmed: 28426559
pmcid: 5497678
Barnes LA et al (2018) Determining the impact of sarcopenia on postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(9):1260–1268
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.05.013
pubmed: 30173713
Schlosser KA et al (2020) Three-dimensional hernia analysis: the impact of size on surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc 34(4):1795–1801
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06931-7
pubmed: 31236720
Baastrup NN et al (2021) Visceral obesity is a predictor of surgical site occurrence and hernia recurrence after open abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 26(1):149–155
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02522-5
pubmed: 34714430
Blatnik JA et al (2012) Predicting severe postoperative respiratory complications following abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):836–841
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f160
pubmed: 22691844
Mommers EHH et al (2017) Impact of hernia volume on pulmonary complications following complex hernia repair. J Surg Res 211:8–13
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.051
pubmed: 28501135
Docimo S Jr et al (2019) Pre-operative characteristics and their role in prolonged intubation following abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Endosc 33(7):2345–2348
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6536-y
pubmed: 30334163
Christy MR et al (2012) The component separation index: a standardized biometric identity in abdominal wall reconstruction. Eplasty 12:e17
pubmed: 22461951