Returning to Work after Stroke: Associations with Cognitive Performance, Motivation, Perceived Working Ability and Barriers.
Journal
Journal of rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1651-2081
Titre abrégé: J Rehabil Med
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101088169
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2023
09 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
06
05
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
9
1
2023
pubmed:
10
1
2023
medline:
12
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate post-stroke return-to-work and its associations with cognitive performance, motivation, perceived working ability, and self-perceived barriers to returning to work. Prospective cohort study of a clinical sample. Participants were 77 stroke patients younger than age 69 years. Assessment included a cognitive screening method for stroke patients (CoMet), a questionnaire regarding work-related matters, and a question regarding motivation to return to work. A predictive model of return-to-work was built, and how participants managed in their working life was examined. Cognitive performance was significantly connected with returning to work. Three of the 5 individuals who dropped out of working life had cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive performance predicted 80% of those who had not returned and 37% of those who had returned by 6 months after the initial assessment. Self-perceived working ability and barriers predicted 64% of those who had not returned and 78% of those who had returned at the 12-month follow-up. Cognitive performance seems to be a crucial predictor of return-to-work post-stroke, but individuals' own evaluations of their working capabilities are also important.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36622215
doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2576
pmc: PMC9847477
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
jrm00365Références
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Feb;100(2):379-383
pubmed: 30054006
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;84(3):316-21
pubmed: 22952327
J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;35(3):127-31
pubmed: 12809195
Neurology. 2018 Nov 13;91(20):e1909-e1917
pubmed: 30315074
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223
pubmed: 23245608
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;41(9):714-8
pubmed: 19774303
Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):243-256
pubmed: 29189108
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;92(5):743-8
pubmed: 21530721
Acta Neurol Scand. 2019 Apr;139(4):382-388
pubmed: 30657175
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 06;6(4):e009974
pubmed: 27053267
Br J Nurs. 2010 Feb 25-Mar 10;19(4):241-8
pubmed: 20220675
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Mar;48(3):273-9
pubmed: 26843361
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1858-69
pubmed: 17852252
Stroke. 2008 May;39(5):1526-32
pubmed: 18369172
Int J Rehabil Res. 2009 Jun;32(2):93-7
pubmed: 19158652
NCHS Data Brief. 2012 May;(95):1-8
pubmed: 22617404
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):406-18
pubmed: 23212240
Stroke. 1995 Mar;26(3):399-401
pubmed: 7886713
Behav Neurol. 2019 Nov 06;2019:2943603
pubmed: 31781293
J Neurol. 2004 Dec;251(12):1507-14
pubmed: 15645352
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41795
pubmed: 22848610
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Nov 10;24(16):860-6
pubmed: 12450462
BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 29;11:742
pubmed: 21957999
Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 Feb;115(2):73-80
pubmed: 17212608