Cost and cost-effectiveness of abstinence contingent wage supplements.

Cocaine Contingency management Cost-effectiveness Employment Opioids Therapeutic workplace

Journal

Drug and alcohol dependence
ISSN: 1879-0046
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Depend
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7513587

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2023
Historique:
received: 01 06 2022
revised: 14 12 2022
accepted: 19 12 2022
pmc-release: 01 03 2024
pubmed: 14 1 2023
medline: 3 3 2023
entrez: 13 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Substance use disorders are correlated with unemployment and poverty. However, few interventions aim to improve substance use, unemployment, and, distally, poverty. The Abstinence-Contingent Wage Supplement (ACWS) randomized controlled trial combined a therapeutic workplace with abstinence-contingent wage supplements to address substance use and unemployment. The ACWS study found that abstinence-contingent wage supplements increased the percentage of participants who had negative drug tests, who were employed, and who were above the poverty line during the intervention period. This study presents the cost of ACWS and calculates the cost-effectiveness of ACWS compared with usual care. To calculate the cost and cost-effectiveness of ACWS, we used activity-based costing methods to cost the intervention and calculated the costs from the provider and healthcare sector perspective. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for negative drug tests and employment. ACWS cost $11,310 per participant over the 12-month intervention period. Total intervention and healthcare costs per participant over the intervention period were $20,625 for usual care and $30,686 for ACWS. At the end of the intervention period an additional participant with a negative drug test cost $1437 while an additional participant employed cost $915. ACWS increases drug abstinence and employment and may be cost-effective at the end of the 12-month intervention period if decision makers are willing to pay the incremental cost associated with the intervention.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Substance use disorders are correlated with unemployment and poverty. However, few interventions aim to improve substance use, unemployment, and, distally, poverty. The Abstinence-Contingent Wage Supplement (ACWS) randomized controlled trial combined a therapeutic workplace with abstinence-contingent wage supplements to address substance use and unemployment. The ACWS study found that abstinence-contingent wage supplements increased the percentage of participants who had negative drug tests, who were employed, and who were above the poverty line during the intervention period. This study presents the cost of ACWS and calculates the cost-effectiveness of ACWS compared with usual care.
METHODS
To calculate the cost and cost-effectiveness of ACWS, we used activity-based costing methods to cost the intervention and calculated the costs from the provider and healthcare sector perspective. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for negative drug tests and employment.
RESULTS
ACWS cost $11,310 per participant over the 12-month intervention period. Total intervention and healthcare costs per participant over the intervention period were $20,625 for usual care and $30,686 for ACWS. At the end of the intervention period an additional participant with a negative drug test cost $1437 while an additional participant employed cost $915.
CONCLUSIONS
ACWS increases drug abstinence and employment and may be cost-effective at the end of the 12-month intervention period if decision makers are willing to pay the incremental cost associated with the intervention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36638680
pii: S0376-8716(22)00491-4
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109754
pmc: PMC10207811
mid: NIHMS1866115
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109754

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA037314
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : T32 DA007209
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest No conflicts declared.

Références

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109322
pubmed: 35077956
Am J Addict. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):457-60
pubmed: 18058410
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 May;74(5):445-452
pubmed: 32086373
Addiction. 2011 May;106(5):960-7
pubmed: 21226886
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jan;107(1):9-20
pubmed: 28078664
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Nov;94:81-90
pubmed: 30243422
Psychol Med. 2017 Jan;47(1):53-65
pubmed: 27654902
Addiction. 2014 Sep;109(9):1426-36
pubmed: 24750232
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Mar;68(2):248-55
pubmed: 17286343
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):33-42
pubmed: 12529568
Addiction. 2007 Sep;102(9):1443-53
pubmed: 17645430
Health Econ. 2001 Dec;10(8):779-87
pubmed: 11747057
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2012;21(1):69-90
pubmed: 22389577
Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(13-14):2165-213
pubmed: 15603001
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 1;171(11):1183-90
pubmed: 25124692
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jun;32(6 Suppl):S203-10
pubmed: 17543712
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Oct;81:25-34
pubmed: 28847452
Future Child. 2007 Fall;17(2):17-42
pubmed: 17902259
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jan 1;120(1-3):55-64
pubmed: 21802222
Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2011 Mar;4(1):4-27
pubmed: 21466502
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jan;120:108160
pubmed: 33298300
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999 May;25(2):207-18
pubmed: 10395156
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015 May;34(3):289-98
pubmed: 25659953
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 19;6:52
pubmed: 16623946
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jun 1;102(1-3):108-15
pubmed: 19324501
Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;2(2):203-212
pubmed: 27777966
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jun 5;42(3):525-546
pubmed: 31976448
Addiction. 2007 Sep;102(9):1463-71
pubmed: 17645428
World Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;12(1):60-8
pubmed: 23471803
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108350
pubmed: 33121867
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107982
pubmed: 32370931
Addiction. 2007 Feb;102(2):309-16
pubmed: 17222286
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Dec;35(4):462-9
pubmed: 18294803
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1092-1102
pubmed: 34347030

Auteurs

Stephen Orme (S)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States. Electronic address: sorme@rti.org.

Gary A Zarkin (GA)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Jackson Luckey (J)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Laura J Dunlap (LJ)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Matthew D Novak (MD)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

August F Holtyn (AF)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Forrest Toegel (F)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Kenneth Silverman (K)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH