Implementation of an intravenous sotalol initiation protocol: Implications for feasibility, safety, and length of stay.
antiarrhythmic drugs
atrial fibrillation
atrial flutter
intravenous sotalol
premature ventricular contractions
quality improvement
ventricular tachycardia
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
revised:
02
12
2022
received:
19
09
2022
accepted:
09
01
2023
pubmed:
15
1
2023
medline:
15
3
2023
entrez:
14
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Oral sotalol initiation requires a multiple-day, inpatient admission to monitor for QT prolongation during loading. A 1-day intravenous (IV) sotalol loading protocol was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in March 2020, but limited data on clinical use and administration currently exists. This study describes implementation of an IV sotalol protocol within an integrated health system, provides initial efficacy and safety outcomes, and examines length of stay (LOS) compared with oral sotalol initiation. IV sotalol was administered according to a prespecified initiation protocol to adult patients with refractory atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline characteristics, safety and feasibility outcomes, and LOS were compared with patients receiving oral sotalol over a similar time period. From January 2021 to June 2022, a total of 29 patients (average age 66.0 ± 8.6 years, 27.6% women) underwent IV sotalol load and 20 patients (average age 60.4 ± 13.9 years, 65.0% women) underwent oral sotalol load. The load was successfully completed in 22/29 (75.9%) patients receiving IV sotalol and 20/20 (100%) of patients receiving oral sotalol, although 7/20 of the oral sotalol patients (35.0%) required dose reduction. Adverse events interrupting IV sotalol infusion included bradycardia (seven patients, 24.1%) and QT prolongation (three patients, 10.3%). No patients receiving IV or oral sotalol developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias before discharge. LOS for patients completing IV load was 2.6 days shorter (mean 1.0 vs. 3.6, p < .001) compared with LOS with oral load. IV sotalol loading has a safety profile that is similar to oral sotalol. It significantly shortens hospital LOS, potentially leading to large cost savings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36640424
doi: 10.1111/jce.15819
pmc: PMC10699543
mid: NIHMS1946511
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sotalol
A6D97U294I
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
502-506Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL125881
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL152712
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R35 HL161249
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Cardiol Res. 2020 Oct;11(5):294-304
pubmed: 32849964
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Aug 1;84(3):270-7
pubmed: 10496434
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 May;4(3):313-20
pubmed: 21540439
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:104005
pubmed: 34273806
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):333-342
pubmed: 34953091
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Nov;27(11):1318-1326
pubmed: 29853342
Circ Res. 2020 Jun 19;127(1):4-20
pubmed: 32716709