Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Prospectively Accelerated Clinical Knee MRI.
Journal
Radiology
ISSN: 1527-1315
Titre abrégé: Radiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401260
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
12
4
2023
pubmed:
18
1
2023
entrez:
17
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background MRI is a powerful diagnostic tool with a long acquisition time. Recently, deep learning (DL) methods have provided accelerated high-quality image reconstructions from undersampled data, but it is unclear if DL image reconstruction can be reliably translated to everyday clinical practice. Purpose To determine the diagnostic equivalence of prospectively accelerated DL-reconstructed knee MRI compared with conventional accelerated MRI for evaluating internal derangement of the knee in a clinical setting. Materials and Methods A DL reconstruction model was trained with images from 298 clinical 3-T knee examinations. In a prospective analysis, patients clinically referred for knee MRI underwent a conventional accelerated knee MRI protocol at 3 T followed by an accelerated DL protocol between January 2020 and February 2021. The equivalence of the DL reconstruction of the images relative to the conventional images for the detection of an abnormality was assessed in terms of interchangeability. Each examination was reviewed by six musculoskeletal radiologists. Analyses pertaining to the detection of meniscal or ligament tears and bone marrow or cartilage abnormalities were based on four-point ordinal scores for the likelihood of an abnormality. Additionally, the protocols were compared with use of four-point ordinal scores for each aspect of image quality: overall image quality, presence of artifacts, sharpness, and signal-to-noise ratio. Results A total of 170 participants (mean age ± SD, 45 years ± 16; 76 men) were evaluated. The DL-reconstructed images were determined to be of diagnostic equivalence with the conventional images for detection of abnormalities. The overall image quality score, averaged over six readers, was significantly better (
Identifiants
pubmed: 36648347
doi: 10.1148/radiol.220425
pmc: PMC10102623
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e220425Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB017183
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB024532
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jun;79(6):3055-3071
pubmed: 29115689
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):1202-10
pubmed: 12111967
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1182-95
pubmed: 17969013
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Jan 29;2(1):e190007
pubmed: 32076662
Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1483-9
pubmed: 25300725
Nature. 2018 Mar 21;555(7697):487-492
pubmed: 29565357
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13710
pubmed: 32792507
Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):366-373
pubmed: 30040039
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Dec;84(6):3054-3070
pubmed: 32506658
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 16;11(8):
pubmed: 34441418
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Mar;218(3):506-516
pubmed: 34523950
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jul;56(1):184-195
pubmed: 34877735
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Apr;137:109600
pubmed: 33610853
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Feb;38(2):394-405
pubmed: 30106719
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Feb;37(2):491-503
pubmed: 29035212
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Dec;215(6):1421-1429
pubmed: 32755163
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 1;117(48):30088-30095
pubmed: 32393633