PCSK9 Inhibition During the Inflammatory Stage of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
COVID-19
PCSK9 inhibition
death
interleukin-6
intubation
randomized controlled trial
Journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 1558-3597
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8301365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 01 2023
24 01 2023
Historique:
received:
18
08
2022
revised:
21
09
2022
accepted:
20
10
2022
entrez:
18
1
2023
pubmed:
19
1
2023
medline:
21
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The intensity of inflammation during COVID-19 is related to adverse outcomes. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is involved in low-density lipoprotein receptor homeostasis, with potential influence on vascular inflammation and on COVID-19 inflammatory response. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of PCSK9 inhibition vs placebo on clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter pilot trial, 60 patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19, with ground-glass opacity pneumonia and arterial partial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio ≤300 mm Hg, were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 140-mg subcutaneous injection of evolocumab or placebo. The primary endpoint was death or need for intubation at 30 days. The main secondary endpoint was change in circulating interleukin (IL)-6 at 7 and 30 days from baseline. Patients randomized to receive the PCSK9 inhibitor had lower rates of death or need for intubation within 30 days vs placebo (23.3% vs 53.3%, risk difference: -30%; 95% CI: -53.40% to -6.59%). Serum IL-6 across time was lower with the PCSK9 inhibitor than with placebo (30-day decline: -56% vs -21%). Patients with baseline IL-6 above the median had lower mortality with PCSK9 inhibition vs placebo (risk difference: -37.50%; 95% CI: -68.20% to -6.70%). PCSK9 inhibition compared with placebo reduced the primary endpoint of death or need for intubation and IL-6 levels in severe COVID-19. Patients with more intense inflammation at randomization had better survival with PCSK9 inhibition vs placebo, indicating that inflammatory intensity may drive therapeutic benefits. (Impact of PCSK9 Inhibition on Clinical Outcome in Patients During the Inflammatory Stage of the COVID-19 [IMPACT-SIRIO 5]; NCT04941105).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The intensity of inflammation during COVID-19 is related to adverse outcomes. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is involved in low-density lipoprotein receptor homeostasis, with potential influence on vascular inflammation and on COVID-19 inflammatory response.
OBJECTIVES
The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of PCSK9 inhibition vs placebo on clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19.
METHODS
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter pilot trial, 60 patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19, with ground-glass opacity pneumonia and arterial partial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio ≤300 mm Hg, were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 140-mg subcutaneous injection of evolocumab or placebo. The primary endpoint was death or need for intubation at 30 days. The main secondary endpoint was change in circulating interleukin (IL)-6 at 7 and 30 days from baseline.
RESULTS
Patients randomized to receive the PCSK9 inhibitor had lower rates of death or need for intubation within 30 days vs placebo (23.3% vs 53.3%, risk difference: -30%; 95% CI: -53.40% to -6.59%). Serum IL-6 across time was lower with the PCSK9 inhibitor than with placebo (30-day decline: -56% vs -21%). Patients with baseline IL-6 above the median had lower mortality with PCSK9 inhibition vs placebo (risk difference: -37.50%; 95% CI: -68.20% to -6.70%).
CONCLUSIONS
PCSK9 inhibition compared with placebo reduced the primary endpoint of death or need for intubation and IL-6 levels in severe COVID-19. Patients with more intense inflammation at randomization had better survival with PCSK9 inhibition vs placebo, indicating that inflammatory intensity may drive therapeutic benefits. (Impact of PCSK9 Inhibition on Clinical Outcome in Patients During the Inflammatory Stage of the COVID-19 [IMPACT-SIRIO 5]; NCT04941105).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36653090
pii: S0735-1097(22)07408-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.030
pmc: PMC9842071
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
PCSK9 protein, human
EC 3.4.21.-
Proprotein Convertase 9
EC 3.4.21.-
Interleukin-6
0
Cholesterol, LDL
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04941105']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
224-234Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This research was supported by the Collegium Medicum of Nicolaus Copernicus University (grant ID ZES.WL.2.2021). Dr Navarese has received speaker and consultancy fees from Amgen, Sanofi-Regeneron, Bayer; and has received grants from Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Gurbel has received grants and personal fees from Bayer HealthCare LLC, Otitopic Inc, Amgen, Janssen, U.S. WorldMeds LLC, Instrumentation Laboratory, Haemonetics, Medicure Inc, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Hikari Dx, and Novartis; has received personal fees from UpToDate, outside the submitted work; has a patent issued (Detection of Restenosis Risk in Patients and Assessment of Cardiac Health and Thrombotic Risk in a Patient); and is an expert witness in litigation involving clopidogrel. Dr Gorog has received institutional research grants from Bayer and Bristol Myers Squibb; and has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Andreotti has received lecture/consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1345-1355
pubmed: 32667669
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):606
pubmed: 35810307
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;146(4):799-807.e9
pubmed: 32710975
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct 15;6(258):258ra143
pubmed: 25320235
Clin Chem. 1999 Jan;45(1):7-17
pubmed: 9895331
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jan 25;7(1):
pubmed: 33527074
Inflammation. 2022 Aug 5;:
pubmed: 35930089
World J Radiol. 2021 Oct 28;13(10):327-343
pubmed: 34786188
EBioMedicine. 2018 Dec;38:257-264
pubmed: 30473376
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):640
pubmed: 32867706
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481
pubmed: 32105632
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1503-1516
pubmed: 33631066
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 2;8(1):2267
pubmed: 29396513
Shock. 2016 Dec;46(6):672-680
pubmed: 27405064
Nat Med. 2021 Oct;27(10):1674-1675
pubmed: 34480126
Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Sep;22(3):200-211
pubmed: 32900326
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):308
pubmed: 33781216
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016 Jan;2(1):44-53
pubmed: 27533061
Virol J. 2022 May 26;19(1):92
pubmed: 35619180
Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40
pubmed: 8532986
J Clin Lipidol. 2020 May - Jun;14(3):297-304
pubmed: 32430154
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;16(4):1005-1015
pubmed: 33893976
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Oct 19;78(16):1635-1654
pubmed: 34649702
Gen Physiol Biophys. 2020 Mar;39(2):123-134
pubmed: 32329440
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 31;9(1):11079
pubmed: 31366894
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Oct 1;5(4):237-245
pubmed: 31236571
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Jul;19(7):475-495
pubmed: 35027697
Cardiol J. 2022;29(1):140-147
pubmed: 34787891
J Med Virol. 2020 Nov;92(11):2283-2285
pubmed: 32343429
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;69(6):1135-1143
pubmed: 28217930
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8
pubmed: 22169081
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188
pubmed: 31504418