Reduced cellulose accessibility slows down enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of cellulose.
Binding
Cellulase
Cellulose accessibility
Enzymatic hydrolysis
Simons' staining
Journal
Bioresource technology
ISSN: 1873-2976
Titre abrégé: Bioresour Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9889523
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
21
12
2022
revised:
13
01
2023
accepted:
16
01
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
2
2
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of cellulose always starts with an initial rapid phase, which gradually slows down, sometimes resulting in incomplete cellulose hydrolysis even after prolonged incubation. Although mechanisms such as end-product inhibition are known to play a role, the predominant mechanism appears to be reduced cellulose accessibility to the enzymes. When using Simon's stain to quantify accessibility, the accessibility of mechanically disintegrated and phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose substrates decreased as hydrolysis proceeded. In contrast, the poor initial accessibility of Avicel remained low throughout hydrolysis. However, washing the residual cellulose increased cellulose accessibility, likely due to the removal of tightly bound but non-productive enzymes which blocked access to more active enzymes in solution. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis of the initial and residual cellulose collected when the hydrolysis plateaued, showed an increase in the roughness of the cellulose surface, possibly resulting in the tighter binding of less active cellulases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36681353
pii: S0960-8524(23)00073-1
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128647
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cellulose
9004-34-6
Cellulase
EC 3.2.1.4
Cellulases
EC 3.2.1.-
Coloring Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
128647Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.