Predicting and elucidating the post-printing behavior of 3D printed cancer cells in hydrogel structures by integrating in-vitro and in-silico experiments.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 01 2023
Historique:
received: 13 08 2022
accepted: 16 01 2023
entrez: 21 1 2023
pubmed: 22 1 2023
medline: 25 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A key feature distinguishing 3D bioprinting from other 3D cell culture techniques is its precise control over created structures. This property allows for the high-resolution fabrication of biomimetic structures with controlled structural and mechanical properties such as porosity, permeability, and stiffness. However, analyzing post-printing cellular dynamics and optimizing their functions within the 3D fabricated environment is only possible through trial and error and replicating several experiments. This issue motivated the development of a cellular automata model for the first time to simulate post-printing cell behaviour within the 3D bioprinted construct. To improve our model, we bioprinted a 3D construct using MDA-MB-231 cell-laden hydrogel and evaluated cellular functions, including viability and proliferation in 11 days. The results showed that our model successfully simulated the 3D bioprinted structure and captured in-vitro observations. We demonstrated that in-silico model could predict and elucidate post-printing biological functions for different initial cell numbers in bioink and different bioink formulations with gelatine and alginate, without replicating several costly and time-consuming in-vitro measurements. We believe such a computational framework will substantially impact 3D bioprinting's future application. We hope this study inspires researchers to further realize how an in-silico model might be utilized to advance in-vitro 3D bioprinting research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36681762
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28286-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-28286-9
pmc: PMC9867702
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hydrogels 0
Gelatin 9000-70-8

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1211

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Adv Healthc Mater. 2020 Aug;9(15):e1900752
pubmed: 31347290
Acta Biomater. 2014 May;10(5):1965-74
pubmed: 24382516
Semin Cancer Biol. 2008 Oct;18(5):356-64
pubmed: 18472275
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 6;2(10):e129
pubmed: 17029556
Biomaterials. 2016 Jan;76:157-72
pubmed: 26524536
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 May 14;6(1):177
pubmed: 33986257
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Feb;3:1-11
pubmed: 30742485
Int J Bioprint. 2020 Jan 24;6(1):253
pubmed: 32782987
Biofabrication. 2020 Jul 29;12(4):042002
pubmed: 32615543
Biophys J. 2005 Aug;89(2):1389-97
pubmed: 15908579
Biofabrication. 2020 May 28;12(3):035018
pubmed: 32252038
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 4;7(1):4575
pubmed: 28676662
Biofabrication. 2016 Sep 23;8(3):032002
pubmed: 27658612
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 6;7(1):17042
pubmed: 29213126
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;32(8):773-85
pubmed: 25093879
Biomater Res. 2016 Apr 25;20:12
pubmed: 27114828
Biofabrication. 2016 Sep 16;8(3):035020
pubmed: 27634915
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017 Sep 13;14(5):631-639
pubmed: 30603516
Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Feb;22(2):151-2
pubmed: 14755282
J Theor Biol. 2001 Dec 7;213(3):315-31
pubmed: 11735284
Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 Jan;45(1):210-223
pubmed: 27503606
Biol Lett. 2018 May;14(5):
pubmed: 29769297
Biofabrication. 2018 Jun 29;10(3):034106
pubmed: 29923501
Biofabrication. 2018 Jun 18;10(3):034105
pubmed: 29809162
J Control Release. 2021 May 10;333:91-106
pubmed: 33774120
Mater Horiz. 2020 Sep 1;7(9):2336-2347
pubmed: 33841881
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48024
pubmed: 23110163
J Theor Biol. 2012 Sep 7;308:1-19
pubmed: 22659352
Physiol Rev. 1996 Jan;76(1):69-125
pubmed: 8592733
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Jul 5;9(26):21959-21970
pubmed: 28598154
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016 Oct 10;2(10):1743-1751
pubmed: 33440472
Eur Cell Mater. 2003 Jun 30;5:29-39; discussion 39-40
pubmed: 14562270
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Aug 3;16(8):e1008041
pubmed: 32745136
3 Biotech. 2018 Dec;8(12):501
pubmed: 30498674

Auteurs

Dorsa Mohammadrezaei (D)

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. D22moham@uwaterloo.ca.

Nafiseh Moghimi (N)

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Shadi Vandvajdi (S)

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Gibin Powathil (G)

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Sara Hamis (S)

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

Mohammad Kohandel (M)

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Articles similaires

Organoids Humans Tissue Engineering Coculture Techniques Regenerative Medicine
Humans Male Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Middle Aged
Humans Neoplasms Male Female Middle Aged
Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires

Classifications MeSH