Stratified glucose-lowering response to vildagliptin and pioglitazone by obesity and hypertriglyceridemia in a randomized crossover trial.
Adult
Humans
Vildagliptin
/ therapeutic use
Pioglitazone
/ therapeutic use
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ drug therapy
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Glycated Hemoglobin
Glucose
/ therapeutic use
Cross-Over Studies
Thiazolidinediones
/ therapeutic use
Nitriles
/ therapeutic use
Pyrrolidines
/ therapeutic use
Obesity
/ complications
Hypertriglyceridemia
/ drug therapy
Māori
Pacific
dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor
obesity
pioglitazone
precision medicine
stratified drug response
thiazolidinedione
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
11
2022
accepted:
02
12
2022
entrez:
26
1
2023
pubmed:
27
1
2023
medline:
28
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding which group of patients with type 2 diabetes will have the most glucose lowering response to certain medications (which target different aspects of glucose metabolism) is the first step in precision medicine. We hypothesized that people with type 2 diabetes who generally have high insulin resistance, such as people of Māori/Pacific ethnicity, and those with obesity and/or hypertriglyceridemia (OHTG), would have greater glucose-lowering by pioglitazone (an insulin sensitizer) versus vildagliptin (an insulin secretagogue). A randomised, open-label, two-period crossover trial was conducted in New Zealand. Adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c>58mmol/mol (>7.5%), received 16 weeks of either pioglitazone (30mg) or vildagliptin (50mg) daily, then switched to the other medication over for another 16 weeks of treatment. Differences in HbA1c were tested for interaction with ethnicity or OHTG, controlling for baseline HbA1c using linear mixed models. Secondary outcomes included weight, blood pressure, side-effects and diabetes treatment satisfaction. 346 participants were randomised (55% Māori/Pacific) between February 2019 to March 2020. HbA1c after pioglitazone was lower than after vildagliptin (mean difference -4.9mmol/mol [0.5%]; 95% CI -6.3, -3.5; p<0.0001). Primary intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant interaction effect by Māori/Pacific vs other ethnicity (1.5mmol/mol [0.1%], 95% CI -0.8, 3.7), and per-protocol analysis (-1.2mmol/mol [0.1%], 95% CI -4.1, 1.7). An interaction effect (-4.7mmol/mol [0.5%], 95% CI -8.1, -1.4) was found by OHTG status. Both treatments generated similar treatment satisfaction scores, although there was greater weight gain and greater improvement in lipids and liver enzymes after pioglitazone than vildagliptin. Comparative glucose-lowering by pioglitazone and vildagliptin is not different between Māori/Pacific people compared with other New Zealand ethnic groups. Presence of OHTG predicts greater glucose lowering by pioglitazone than vildagliptin. www.anzctr.org.au, identifier (ACTRN12618001907235).
Sections du résumé
Background
Understanding which group of patients with type 2 diabetes will have the most glucose lowering response to certain medications (which target different aspects of glucose metabolism) is the first step in precision medicine.
Aims
We hypothesized that people with type 2 diabetes who generally have high insulin resistance, such as people of Māori/Pacific ethnicity, and those with obesity and/or hypertriglyceridemia (OHTG), would have greater glucose-lowering by pioglitazone (an insulin sensitizer) versus vildagliptin (an insulin secretagogue).
Methods
A randomised, open-label, two-period crossover trial was conducted in New Zealand. Adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c>58mmol/mol (>7.5%), received 16 weeks of either pioglitazone (30mg) or vildagliptin (50mg) daily, then switched to the other medication over for another 16 weeks of treatment. Differences in HbA1c were tested for interaction with ethnicity or OHTG, controlling for baseline HbA1c using linear mixed models. Secondary outcomes included weight, blood pressure, side-effects and diabetes treatment satisfaction.
Results
346 participants were randomised (55% Māori/Pacific) between February 2019 to March 2020. HbA1c after pioglitazone was lower than after vildagliptin (mean difference -4.9mmol/mol [0.5%]; 95% CI -6.3, -3.5; p<0.0001). Primary intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant interaction effect by Māori/Pacific vs other ethnicity (1.5mmol/mol [0.1%], 95% CI -0.8, 3.7), and per-protocol analysis (-1.2mmol/mol [0.1%], 95% CI -4.1, 1.7). An interaction effect (-4.7mmol/mol [0.5%], 95% CI -8.1, -1.4) was found by OHTG status. Both treatments generated similar treatment satisfaction scores, although there was greater weight gain and greater improvement in lipids and liver enzymes after pioglitazone than vildagliptin.
Conclusions
Comparative glucose-lowering by pioglitazone and vildagliptin is not different between Māori/Pacific people compared with other New Zealand ethnic groups. Presence of OHTG predicts greater glucose lowering by pioglitazone than vildagliptin.
Clinical trial registration
www.anzctr.org.au, identifier (ACTRN12618001907235).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36699039
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1091421
pmc: PMC9869378
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vildagliptin
I6B4B2U96P
Pioglitazone
X4OV71U42S
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
0
Glycated Hemoglobin
0
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Thiazolidinediones
0
Nitriles
0
Pyrrolidines
0
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12618001907235']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1091421Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Brandon, Jiang, Yeu, Tweedie-Cullen, Smallman, Doherty, Macaskill-Smith, Doran, Clark, Moffitt, Merry, Nehren, King, Hindmarsh, Leask, Merriman, Orr-Walker, Shepherd, Paul and Murphy.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors RP and RM have received speaking honoraria from Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, also Novartis (RM) and Inova pharmaceuticals (RP). RP is a member of the Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Dexcom New Zealand advisory boards. Authors KAM, RD, PC were employed by Ventures/Pinnacle Incorporated, a primary health care organisation which has no relevant commercial or financial relationships. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 1;49(17):1772-80
pubmed: 17466227
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1948-1957
pubmed: 33534728
Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2458-64
pubmed: 17595355
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010 Dec;12(12):1023-35
pubmed: 20977573
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015 Feb;31(2):155-67
pubmed: 25044702
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2457-71
pubmed: 17517853
Nat Genet. 2016 Sep;48(9):1049-1054
pubmed: 27455349
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1617-1635
pubmed: 32561617
N Z Med J. 2007 Nov 09;120(1265):U2800
pubmed: 18264180
BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378
pubmed: 31366597
Drug Discov Today. 2017 Jan;22(1):173-179
pubmed: 27818254
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002 Sep-Oct;18 Suppl 3:S64-9
pubmed: 12324988
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Sep;99(9):3160-8
pubmed: 24921653
Diabetologia. 2018 Jul;61(7):1603-1613
pubmed: 29721634
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1279-89
pubmed: 16214598
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S64-S74
pubmed: 27979895
Diabetes Care. 2018 Sep;41(9):1844-1853
pubmed: 30072404
Diabetologia. 2022 Nov;65(11):1770-1781
pubmed: 34981134
Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2779-2789
pubmed: 34417843
Diabetes. 1998 Apr;47(4):507-14
pubmed: 9568680
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 2;52(10):869-81
pubmed: 18755353
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):e036518
pubmed: 32873667
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 21;10(12):e042784
pubmed: 33371044
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e209-e217
pubmed: 33069275
Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):705-712
pubmed: 29386249