Prognostic value of different anthropometric indices over different measurement intervals to predict mortality in 6-59-month-old children.
Anthropometry
Mid-upper arm circumference
Mortality
Stunting
Underweight
Wasting
Journal
Public health nutrition
ISSN: 1475-2727
Titre abrégé: Public Health Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9808463
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
medline:
9
6
2023
pubmed:
2
2
2023
entrez:
1
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the prognostic value of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), weight-for-height Pooled analysis of twelve prospective studies examining survival after anthropometric assessment. Sensitivity and false-positive ratios to predict death within 1, 3 and 6 months were compared for three individual anthropometric indices and their combinations. Community-based, prospective studies from twelve countries in Africa and Asia. Children aged 6-59 months living in the study areas. For all anthropometric indices, the receiver operating characteristic curves were higher for shorter than for longer durations of follow-up. Sensitivity was higher for death with 1-month follow-up compared with 6 months by 49 % (95 % CI (30, 69)) for MUAC < 115 mm ( Frequent anthropometric measurements significantly improve the identification of malnourished children with a high risk of death without markedly increasing false positives. Combining two indices increases sensitivity but also increases false positives among children meeting case definitions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36722310
pii: S1368980023000149
doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000149
pmc: PMC10346023
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1210-1221Références
Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;34(3):335-40
pubmed: 25799486
Lancet. 1995 Mar 11;345(8950):631-3
pubmed: 7898183
Lancet. 1972 Jun 17;1(7764):1333
pubmed: 4113415
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;97(4):896-901
pubmed: 23426036
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e195-201
pubmed: 20587675
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451
pubmed: 23746772
Arch Dis Child. 1987 Aug;62(8):833-5
pubmed: 3662589
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(3):538-543
pubmed: 31496465
BMC Med. 2021 Sep 20;19(1):222
pubmed: 34538239
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):862-871
pubmed: 30501655
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1415-1423
pubmed: 28424189
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 9;17(7):e1003192
pubmed: 32645109
Nutr J. 2015 Aug 25;14:86
pubmed: 26303859
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 01;9(7):e101159
pubmed: 24983995
Lancet. 1985 Nov 30;2(8466):1229-30
pubmed: 2866302
N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):211-5
pubmed: 806804
Arch Public Health. 2015 May 18;73(1):26
pubmed: 25992287
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0245477
pubmed: 33534818
Arch Public Health. 2018 Jul 16;76:28
pubmed: 30026945
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Feb 03;:1-17
pubmed: 36734049
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64636
pubmed: 23734210
Br J Nutr. 2020 Apr 14;123(7):756-767
pubmed: 31818335
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Nov;11(6):913-919
pubmed: 32991790
J Nutr. 1994 Oct;124(10 Suppl):2047S-2081S
pubmed: 7931716
J Nutr. 1994 Oct;124(10 Suppl):2082S-2105S
pubmed: 7931717
Lancet. 1993 Jun 12;341(8859):1491-5
pubmed: 8099378
Matern Child Nutr. 2014 Oct;10(4):474-80
pubmed: 24785183
Arch Public Health. 2016 Sep 06;74(1):38
pubmed: 27602207
J Nutr. 2015 Nov;145(11):2604-9
pubmed: 26423737