Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Erythrodermic Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 6 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Humans
Male
Adult
Female
Dermatitis, Atopic
/ diagnosis
Double-Blind Method
Injections, Subcutaneous
Treatment Outcome
Severity of Illness Index
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Eczema
/ drug therapy
Glucocorticoids
/ therapeutic use
Dermatologic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Pruritus
/ etiology
Biomarkers
Journal
JAMA dermatology
ISSN: 2168-6084
Titre abrégé: JAMA Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589530
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2023
01 03 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
2
2
2023
medline:
21
3
2023
entrez:
1
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Erythrodermic atopic dermatitis (AD) is a severe AD subtype defined by extensive skin involvement, leading to complications and sometimes hospitalization. To assess dupilumab's efficacy and safety in patients with erythrodermic AD in clinical trials. This post hoc analysis included patients enrolled in 6 multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Patients included in this analysis met erythrodermic AD criteria of 90% or greater body surface area (BSA) affected by AD and Global Individual Sign Score for erythema of 1 or higher. Data analyses for this post hoc analysis were conducted between March 5, 2019, and October 24, 2020. Dupilumab once weekly or every 2 weeks, or placebo, either as monotherapy or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS). Efficacy (BSA, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS] score), changes in serum biomarkers (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, total immunoglobulin E, lactate dehydrogenase), and safety (incidence of adverse events) at week 16. Data were pooled within each regimen; monotherapy and concomitant TCS results are shown separately. Of 3075 randomized patients, 209 met criteria for erythrodermic AD at baseline, with the median age being 31 and 39 years in the monotherapy and concomitant TCS trials, respectively, similar to the overall populations (34 and 36 years, respectively); 71.3% (n = 97) and 74.0% (n = 54) of patients, respectively, were male (compared with 58.7% and 60.6% in the overall populations). In patients with erythrodermic AD, dupilumab once weekly and every 2 weeks vs placebo significantly improved percentage of BSA affected by AD (least squares mean percent change [SE]) with monotherapy (-42.0% [7.7%] and -39.9% [6.5%] vs -17.2% [11.0%]; P = .03) and concomitant TCS (-63.2% [6.7%] and -56.1% [9.1%] vs -14.5% [7.3%]; P < .001); EASI score with monotherapy (-58.5% [9.0%] and -58.3% [7.9%] vs -22.3% [12.4%]; P = .004 and P = .003, respectively) and concomitant TCS (-78.9% [7.8%] and -70.6% [10.1%] vs 19.3% [8.2%]; P < .001); and PP-NRS score in monotherapy (-45.9% [7.8%] and -33.9% [6.6%] vs -0.6% [9.4%]; P < .001) and concomitant therapy (-53.0% [8.1%] and -55.7% [10.8%] vs -26.0% [8.8%]; P = .006 and P = .01, respectively). Nominally statistically significant improvement was seen as early as week 1 (EASI and PP-NRS scores with monotherapy). Biomarker levels were significantly reduced vs placebo. The most frequent adverse events in dupilumab-treated patients were injection-site reaction, conjunctivitis, and nasopharyngitis. In this post hoc analysis of 6 randomized clinical trials, treatment with dupilumab resulted in rapid, sustained improvements in AD signs and symptoms with acceptable safety in patients with erythrodermic AD, similar to those in the trials' overall patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01859988, NCT02277743, NCT02277769, NCT03054428, NCT02260986, NCT02755649.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36723913
pii: 2800880
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6192
pmc: PMC10018319
doi:
Substances chimiques
dupilumab
420K487FSG
Glucocorticoids
0
Dermatologic Agents
0
Biomarkers
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02755649', 'NCT02260986', 'NCT01859988', 'NCT02277769', 'NCT03054428', 'NCT02277743']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
255-266Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Int J Dermatol. 1998 Feb;37(2):104-7
pubmed: 9542663
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 19;9(9):
pubmed: 32824992
Dermatology. 2012;225(2):154-62
pubmed: 23037884
Lancet. 2022 Jul 23;400(10348):273-282
pubmed: 35871814
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017 May;13(5):425-437
pubmed: 28277826
Paediatr Drugs. 2021 Sep;23(5):515-527
pubmed: 34462864
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Dec;6(4):471-507
pubmed: 27613297
Int J Dermatol. 2016 Dec;55(12):e616-e618
pubmed: 27420287
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Jan;148(1):128-33
pubmed: 12534606
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Jul;35(1):53-7
pubmed: 8682964
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Jun;20(3):443-456
pubmed: 31066001
J Clin Invest. 2004 Mar;113(5):651-7
pubmed: 14991059
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Apr;180(4):790-801
pubmed: 29761486
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Jan 1;156(1):44-56
pubmed: 31693077
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1188-1204
pubmed: 31838750
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5153-8
pubmed: 24706856
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2015 May;28(5):228-36; quiz 237-8
pubmed: 25882661
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr;147(4):1174-1190.e1
pubmed: 33516871
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1101-1112
pubmed: 33761207
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Apr;20(2):181-192
pubmed: 30536048
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 May;33(3):1608-1616
pubmed: 33557637
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Nov;45(5):675-8
pubmed: 11606915
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Mar;137(3):603-613
pubmed: 27825969
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Aug;46(6):1001-1010
pubmed: 33639006
Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):40-52
pubmed: 26454361
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Jan;15(1):35-50
pubmed: 26471366
Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1120-1135
pubmed: 31407311
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr;139(4S):S65-S76
pubmed: 28390479
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Feb;64(2):275-81
pubmed: 21122943
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):327-49
pubmed: 24813298
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jan;143(1):155-172
pubmed: 30194992
Br J Dermatol. 2018 May;178(5):1083-1101
pubmed: 29193016
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):130-9
pubmed: 25006719
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2335-2348
pubmed: 27690741
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Apr;78(4):733-740.e11
pubmed: 29032119
Int J Dermatol. 2004 Jan;43(1):39-47
pubmed: 14693020
J Dermatol Case Rep. 2016 Mar 31;10(1):1-9
pubmed: 27119000
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Jul;24(7):781-8
pubmed: 20028449
Clin Dermatol. 2005 Mar-Apr;23(2):206-17
pubmed: 15802214
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Sep;181(3):459-473
pubmed: 30851191
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Nov - Dec;8(10):3622-3625.e19
pubmed: 32702518
J Dermatol. 2004 Apr;31(4):277-83
pubmed: 15187322
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Aug;77(2):280-286.e1
pubmed: 28601391
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Dec;183(6):1073-1082
pubmed: 32068893
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9774
pubmed: 32555205
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Mar;22(2):243-255
pubmed: 33655423
BMC Dermatol. 2005 May 09;5:5
pubmed: 15882451
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2287-2303
pubmed: 28478972
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jul;83(1):197-199
pubmed: 32229275
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 01;157(9):1047-1055
pubmed: 34347860
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1357-1372
pubmed: 34142350
Front Immunol. 2020 Aug 06;11:1768
pubmed: 32849633
Acta Derm Venereol. 2019 Jul 1;99(9):818-819
pubmed: 31045233
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8707
pubmed: 28821884
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Dec;134(6):1293-1300
pubmed: 25482871
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Feb;156(2):203-21
pubmed: 17223859
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Jul 15;101(7):adv00504
pubmed: 34043020
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5147-52
pubmed: 24706858
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):429-38
pubmed: 24269258