Ultra-low-dose CT is feasible for torsion measurement of the lower limb in patients with metal implants.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2023
01 Mar 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
23
3
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients who need torsion measurement of the lower limb often have metal implants hindering We retrospectively included all patients with clinically indicated torsion measurement in the period July 2019 to June 2021 and metal implants in the scanning field. The ULD-CT protocol comprised automated tube current time product and automated tube voltage with reference settings of 100kV/20mAs (hip), 80kV/20mAs (knee) and 80kV/10mAs (ankle). Femoral neck anteversion, tibial, intra-articular knee and overall leg torsion measurements were performed by two radiologists independently. Diagnostic confidence regarding the delineation of the relevant cortical bone was rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic, 5 = excellent). 102 consecutive patients could be included (BMI 27.38 ± 5.85) with 154 metal implants. Median total dose length product of the ULD-CT-torsion measurement was 16.5mGycm [11-39]. Both readers showed high agreement with a maximum torsional difference of 4.1°. Diagnostic confidence was rated best (5/5) in 92.2% (reader 1) and 93.1% (reader 2) with a worst rating of 3/5. The new ULD-CT protocol is feasible for torsion measurement of the lower limb - even in patients with metal implants. Metal implants are not an obstacle for ULD-CT torsion measurements of the lower limb.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36728237
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220495
pmc: PMC10078873
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20220495Références
Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):619-28
pubmed: 14739312
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 03;11(7):
pubmed: 34359292
Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Apr;49(4):531-539
pubmed: 31501959
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Br Med Bull. 1997;53(2):238-52
pubmed: 9246834
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):381-390
pubmed: 32515680
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1377-1396
pubmed: 27115820
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Feb;100(1):147-51
pubmed: 24439563
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016 Oct;45(8):20160228
pubmed: 27461784
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 1;102(7):582-591
pubmed: 31977824
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(18):460
pubmed: 31700896
Acad Radiol. 2018 Oct;25(10):1277-1284
pubmed: 29500115
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Dec;85(12):1142-6; quiz 1146
pubmed: 21123642
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):3574-3581
pubmed: 33241518
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):1818-1825
pubmed: 29196856
Neuroradiology. 2017 Feb;59(2):169-176
pubmed: 28091696
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;13(2):165-73
pubmed: 22438683
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2071-7
pubmed: 20008689
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13761-6
pubmed: 14610281
Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Jan;51(1):153-159
pubmed: 34132888
Rofo. 1992 Sep;157(3):245-51
pubmed: 1391819
Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):4155-4161
pubmed: 26911887
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1243-7
pubmed: 23934503
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1358-1367
pubmed: 31464114
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6793-6801
pubmed: 33710371
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):2621-2633
pubmed: 33034747
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1850-1857
pubmed: 34431248