Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Cervical Fusions Stratified by Levels Decompressed.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4- level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusions (PCF) procedures using a national database.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical outcomes involving 3- or 4-level ACDF and PCF cases are not well-described. As there are situations where both ACDF and PCF can be employed, it is important to compare the risks and benefits of both procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF or PCF between 2010 and 2020 were identified in PearlDiver using current procedural terminology codes. Surgeries done for infectious, traumatic, or neoplastic etiologies were excluded. 2-year reoperations and 90-day readmissions were queried. Surgical complications and transfusions were compiled using ICD-9/10 billing codes. ACDF and PCF procedures were then matched by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and a number of levels fused, and the above outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In all, 31,301 PCFs and 110,526 ACDFs were identified. After matching for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, a total of 30,353 ACDF and PCF procedures were compared. Three-level and 4-level PCFs had higher rates of 90-day postoperative surgical complications compared with ACDF (OR=2.4 and 2.87, respectively; P <0.001). In addition, higher rates of 90-day readmissions were noted in 3-level PCF compared with 3-level ACDF (OR=1.24, P <0.001). Ninety-day postoperative transfusions were higher in both 3- and 4-level PCFs (OR=2.44 and 18.27, respectively; P <0.001). Two-year reoperations rates were higher for 3-level PCF procedures than 3-level ACDF (OR=1.22; P =0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent 3-4-level ACDF had lower rates of readmission, blood transfusions, and postoperative complications compared with 3-4-level PCF. This data suggests that in cases of 3-4-level pathology with clinical equipoise regarding approach, ACDF may be associated with less short-term morbidity, however, data on fusion rates and adjacent level disease are needed.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

P.H.: Royalty agreements with Medtronics, Nuvasive, and Zimmer Biomet. J.L.: MD: Board member for NASS; Former consultant to Viseon. No royalties. Z.B.: consultancy: Cerapedics (past); Research Support: SeaSpine (past, paid to the institution), Next Science (paid directly to institution), Medical Metrics (past, paid directly to institution), NIH SBIR Subaward (paid to institution); North American Spine Society: committee member; Lumbar Spine Society: Co-chair Educational Committee, AOSpine Knowledge Forum Degenerative: Associate member; AOSNA Research committee- committee member: Patents (issued): Biomarkers for painful intervertebral disks and methods of use thereof. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.