Preoperative electrodiagnostic studies and postoperative outcomes for ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow: A systematic review.


Journal

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1934-1563
Titre abrégé: PM R
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101491319

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
revised: 20 12 2022
received: 11 10 2022
accepted: 17 01 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 3 2 2023
entrez: 2 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To analyze the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies and postoperative pain and functional outcomes following ulnar nerve decompression and/or transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). Protocol was submitted and database search was conducted by an experienced librarian of all available studies in the English language from 1990 to June 8, 2022. Databases included Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies, and studies involving adults ≥18 years of age who underwent ulnar nerve decompression and/or transposition for UNE. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality of Assessment Tool. Certainty in evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A meta-analysis was not performed. A total of 289 studies were screened, and 8 retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria comprising 762 patients. A decreased or absent preoperative sensory nerve action potential amplitude (SNAP) showed significance with worse postoperative outcomes. The presence of preoperative conduction block showed significance in higher quality studies. There was limited evidence for slow preoperative motor conduction velocities or preoperative electromyography (EMG) abnormalities and postoperative outcomes. Overall quality assessment demonstrated that two studies had "good," four "fair," and two "poor" quality of evidence. Certainty in evidence was "low" due to risk of bias. A decreased or absent preoperative ulnar SNAP may predict worse postoperative outcomes. Per higher quality studies, preoperative conduction block at the elbow may also predict worse postoperative outcomes. Careful interpretation is required with a full understanding of the limited evidence, risk of bias, and low certainty in evidence to support the use of preoperative EDX to predict postoperative outcomes in UNE.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36730149
doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12952
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1326-1334

Informations de copyright

© 2023 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Références

Mondelli M, Grippo A, Mariani M, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in floor cleaners. Neurophysiol Clin. 2006;36(4):245-253.
Beekman R, Van Der Plas JP, Uitdehaag BM, Schellens RL, Visser LH. Clinical, electrodiagnostic, and sonographic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30(2):202-208.
Doughty CT, Bowley MP. Entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremity. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103(2):357-370.
Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: summary statement. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22(3):408-411.
Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):Cd006839.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71.
Mcgowan AJ. The results of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis. J Bone Jt Surg. 1950;32(3):293-301.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The upper extremity collaborative group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-608.
Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2006;7:44.
Kleinman WB, Bishop AT. Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg. 1989;14(6):972-979.
Council SHPNIMR, Special Report Series LH.
Wilson DH, Krout R. Surgery of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: 16 cases treated by decompression without transposition. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1973;38(6):780-785.
Messina A, Messina JC. Transposition of the ulnar nerve and its vascular bundle for the entrapment syndrome at the elbow. J Hand Surg. 1995;20(5):638-648.
MacDermid JC, Grewal R. Development and validation of the patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2013;14:146.
Institute NHLB. Study Quality Assessment Tools. National Institutes of Health. 2019. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed August 19, 2022.
Murad MH. Clinical practice guidelines: A primer on development and dissemination. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(3):423-433.
Murad MH, Mustafa RA, Schünemann HJ, Sultan S, Santesso N. Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. Evid Based Med. 2017;22(3):85-87.
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(2):417-430.
Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (realist and meta-narrative evidence syntheses - evolving standards) project. Health Serv Delivery Res. 2014;2(30):1-278.
Tong J-S, Dong Z, Xu B, Zhang C-G, Gu Y-D. Surgical treatment for severe cubital tunnel syndrome with absent sensory nerve conduction. Neural Regener Res. 2019;14(3):519-524.
Tong J, Dong Z, Xu B, Zhang C, Gu Y. Predictors of surgical outcomes for severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a review of 146 patients. Acta Neurochir. 2018;160(3):645-650.
Kong L, Bai J, Yu K, Zhang B, Zhang J, Tian D. Predictors of surgical outcomes after in situ ulnar nerve decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome. Ther Clin Risk Manage. 2018;14:69-74.
Suzuki T, Iwamoto T, Shizu K, Suzuki K, Yamada H, Sato K. Predictors of postoperative outcomes of cubital tunnel syndrome treatments using multiple logistic regression analysis. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(3):453-456.
Dahlin E, Dahlin E, Andersson GS, Thomsen NOB, Bjorkman A, Dahlin LB. Outcome of simple decompression of the compressed ulnar nerve at the elbow - influence of smoking, gender, and electrophysiological findings. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(2):149-155.
Huang W, Zhang P-X, Peng Z, Xue F, Wang T-B, Jiang B-G. Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve improves neurological function in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. Neural Regener Res. 2015;10(10):1690-1695.
Shi Q, MacDermid J, Grewal R, King GJ, Faber K, Miller TA. Predictors of functional outcome change 18 months after anterior ulnar nerve transposition. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(2):307-312.
Kaempffe FA, Farbach J. A modified surgical procedure for cubital tunnel syndrome: partial medial epicondylectomy. J Hand Surg. 1998;23(3):492-499.
McGuinness LAHJ. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2020;12:1-7.
Andrews K, Rowland A, Pranjal A, Ebraheim N. Cubital tunnel syndrome: anatomy, clinical presentation, and management. J Orthop. 2018;15(3):832-836.
Miller TT, Reinus WR. Nerve entrapment syndromes of the elbow, forearm, and wrist. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):585-594.
Mezian K, Jačisko J, Kaiser R, et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: from ultrasound scanning to treatment. Front Neurol. 2021;12:661441.
Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Walker FO. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel. J Hand Surg. 2006;31(7):1088-1093.
Volpe A, Rossato G, Bottanelli M, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: correlation with electrophysiological studies. Rheumatology. 2009;48(9):1098-1101.
Wade RG, Griffiths TT, Flather R, Burr NE, Teo M, Bourke G. Safety and outcomes of different surgical techniques for cubital tunnel decompression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2024352.
Adkinson JM, Zhong L, Aliu O, Chung KC. Surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: trends and the influence of patient and surgeon characteristics. J Hand Surg. 2015;40(9):1824-1831.
Bland JD. Do nerve conduction studies predict the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression? Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(7):935-940.
al-Qattan MM, Manktelow RT, Bowen CV. Outcome of carpal tunnel release in diabetic patients. J Hand Surg. 1994;19(5):626-629.
Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Ornstein E. Patient satisfaction and return to work after endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg. 1998;23(1):58-65.
Higgs PE, Edwards DF, Martin DS, Weeks PM. Relation of preoperative nerve-conduction values to outcome in workers with surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg. 1997;22(2):216-221.
Straub TA. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective analysis of factors associated with unsatisfactory results. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(3):269-274.
Kulick MI, Gordillo G, Javidi T, Kilgore ES Jr, Newmayer WL 3rd. Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg. 1986;11(1):59-66.
Padua L, LoMonaco M, Aulisa L, et al. Surgical prognosis in carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of a preoperative neurophysiological assessment. Acta Neurol Scand. 1996;94(5):343-346.
Nau HE, Lange B, Lange S. Prediction of outcome of decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg. 1988;13(4):391-394.
Bland JD. A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23(8):1280-1283.
Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph #26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20(12):1477-1486.

Auteurs

James B Meiling (JB)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Justin B Schappell (JB)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Eric E Twohey (EE)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Larry J Prokop (LJ)

Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Daniel M Cushman (DM)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH