Absorbed dose calculation for a realistic CT-derived mouse phantom irradiated with a standard Cs-137 cell irradiator using a Monte Carlo method.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2022
accepted:
07
01
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Computed tomography (CT) derived Monte Carlo (MC) phantoms allow dose determination within small animal models that is not feasible with in-vivo dosimetry. The aim of this study was to develop a CT-derived MC phantom generated from a mouse with a xenograft tumour that could then be used to calculate both the dose heterogeneity in the tumour volume and out of field scattered dose for pre-clinical small animal irradiation experiments. A BEAMnrc Monte-Carlo model has been built of our irradiation system that comprises a lead collimator with a 1 cm diameter aperture fitted to a Cs-137 gamma irradiator. The MC model of the irradiation system was validated by comparing the calculated dose results with dosimetric film measurement in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom using a 1D gamma-index analysis. Dose distributions in the MC mouse phantom were calculated and visualized on the CT-image data. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for the tumour and organs at risk (OARs). The effect of the xenographic tumour volume on the scattered out of field dose was also investigated. The defined gamma index analysis criteria were met, indicating that our MC simulation is a valid model for MC mouse phantom dose calculations. MC dose calculations showed a maximum out of field dose to the mouse of 7% of Dmax. Absorbed dose to the tumour varies in the range 60%-100% of Dmax. DVH analysis demonstrated that tumour received an inhomogeneous dose of 12 Gy-20 Gy (for 20 Gy prescribed dose) while out of field doses to all OARs were minimized (1.29 Gy-1.38 Gy). Variation of the xenographic tumour volume exhibited no significant effect on the out of field scattered dose to OARs. The CT derived MC mouse model presented here is a useful tool for tumour dose verifications as well as investigating the doses to normal tissue (in out of field) for preclinical radiobiological research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36730280
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280765
pii: PONE-D-22-06377
pmc: PMC9928120
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cesium-137
4T2E65IAR7
Cesium Radioisotopes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0280765Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Entezam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):4991-9
pubmed: 19994508
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 1;99(3):677-679
pubmed: 29280462
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177428
pubmed: 28545054
Health Phys. 2014 Jan;106(1):97-105
pubmed: 24276553
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 14;13(1):176
pubmed: 30217160
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Dec 27;7:223
pubmed: 23270380
Z Med Phys. 2014 Dec;24(4):363-72
pubmed: 25270978
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;947:223-31
pubmed: 23138908
J Cancer Res Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;7(3):308-13
pubmed: 22044813
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 08;17(1):408-415
pubmed: 26894338
PLoS One. 2010 May 03;5(5):e10466
pubmed: 20454675
J Digit Imaging. 2016 Apr;29(2):206-15
pubmed: 26482912
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 08;15(5):4869
pubmed: 25207573
Radiat Res. 2010 Apr;173(4):557-78
pubmed: 20334528
Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):111
pubmed: 26745904
Health Phys. 2018 May;114(5):486-499
pubmed: 29578897
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 Jun;66(6):728-731
pubmed: 32696876
J Nucl Med. 2011 Oct;52(10):1654-63
pubmed: 21859811
Phys Med. 2019 Nov;67:107-115
pubmed: 31706146
Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2455-64
pubmed: 14528967
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 21;59(18):R233-302
pubmed: 25144730
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041724
pubmed: 23556894
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Apr;54(2):86-97
pubmed: 32377260
Med Phys. 2014 Dec;41(12):122101
pubmed: 25471974
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):590-9
pubmed: 20229867
Cancer Radiother. 2018 Oct;22(6-7):567-580
pubmed: 30197026
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0171559
pubmed: 28222111
PLoS One. 2016 May 05;11(5):e0153913
pubmed: 27149115
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 21;58(12):4255-76
pubmed: 23719506
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jul 21;50(14):3375-92
pubmed: 16177516
Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):034101
pubmed: 24593746
Br J Radiol. 2019 Mar;92(1095):20180469
pubmed: 30362815
Phys Med. 2019 Feb;58:1-7
pubmed: 30824140
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(6):2461-2471
pubmed: 32133649
Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):011710
pubmed: 24387502
Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2523-34
pubmed: 21776787
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Dec;4(12):1973-81
pubmed: 21930799
Med Phys. 2010 Oct;37(10):5322-9
pubmed: 21089767
Med Image Anal. 2010 Dec;14(6):723-37
pubmed: 20576463
Br J Radiol. 2019 Mar;92(1095):20180744
pubmed: 30706718
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct;20(10):160-171
pubmed: 31541536
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31179
pubmed: 22363574
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Jan;3(1):1-23
pubmed: 30740582
Radiat Res. 2017 Apr;187(4):433-442
pubmed: 28140787
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166767
pubmed: 27870878
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 24;16(8):e0255923
pubmed: 34428218
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 08;16(2):5141
pubmed: 26103181
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9808
pubmed: 32555530
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jun 21;56(12):R55-83
pubmed: 21617291
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 18;11(7):e0159515
pubmed: 27427766
Curr Probl Cancer. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1):25-37
pubmed: 26582738
Med Phys. 2007 Dec;34(12):4810-7
pubmed: 18196809
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0206879
pubmed: 30408095
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2550-8
pubmed: 25979047
Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Oct;87(10):1001-10
pubmed: 21961967
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0266604
pubmed: 35385553
Med Phys. 1995 May;22(5):503-24
pubmed: 7643786
Med Phys. 2019 Jan;46(1):394-404
pubmed: 30417377
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Dec 7;56(23):7585-600
pubmed: 22086189
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):1030-1036
pubmed: 30488962
EMBO J. 2019 Aug 1;38(15):e101654
pubmed: 31282586