Disparities in Telemedicine Literacy and Access in the United States.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2023
01 03 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Because of the expansion of telehealth services through the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the potential of telemedicine in plastic surgery has gained visibility. This study aims to identify populations who may have limited access to telemedicine. The authors created a telemedicine literacy index (TLI) using a multivariate regression model and data from the US Census and Pew Research Institute survey. A multivariate regression model was created using backwards elimination, with TLI as the dependent variable and demographics as independent variables. The resulting regression coefficients were applied to data from the 2018 US Census at the county level to create a county-specific technological literacy index (cTLI). Significance was set at P < 0.05. On multivariable analysis, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with telemedicine literacy: age, sex, race, employment status, income level, marital status, educational attainment, and urban or rural classification. Counties in the lowest tertile had significantly lower median annual income levels ($43,613 versus $60,418; P < 0.001) and lower proportion of the population with at least a bachelor's degree (16.7% versus 26%; P < 0.001). Rural areas were approximately three times more likely to be in the lowest cTLI compared with urban areas ( P < 0.001). Additional associations with low cTLI were Black race ( P = 0.045), widowed marital status ( P < 0.001), less than high school education ( P = 0.005), and presence of a disability ( P = 0.01). These results highlight disadvantaged groups at risk of being underserved with telehealth. Using these findings, key stakeholders may be able to target these communities for interventions to increase telemedicine literacy and access.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Because of the expansion of telehealth services through the 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the potential of telemedicine in plastic surgery has gained visibility. This study aims to identify populations who may have limited access to telemedicine.
METHODS
The authors created a telemedicine literacy index (TLI) using a multivariate regression model and data from the US Census and Pew Research Institute survey. A multivariate regression model was created using backwards elimination, with TLI as the dependent variable and demographics as independent variables. The resulting regression coefficients were applied to data from the 2018 US Census at the county level to create a county-specific technological literacy index (cTLI). Significance was set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
On multivariable analysis, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with telemedicine literacy: age, sex, race, employment status, income level, marital status, educational attainment, and urban or rural classification. Counties in the lowest tertile had significantly lower median annual income levels ($43,613 versus $60,418; P < 0.001) and lower proportion of the population with at least a bachelor's degree (16.7% versus 26%; P < 0.001). Rural areas were approximately three times more likely to be in the lowest cTLI compared with urban areas ( P < 0.001). Additional associations with low cTLI were Black race ( P = 0.045), widowed marital status ( P < 0.001), less than high school education ( P = 0.005), and presence of a disability ( P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
These results highlight disadvantaged groups at risk of being underserved with telehealth. Using these findings, key stakeholders may be able to target these communities for interventions to increase telemedicine literacy and access.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36730344
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009939
pii: 00006534-202303000-00045
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
677-685Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Telehealth Index: 2019 consumer survey. Published online 2019. Available at: https://static.americanwell.com/app/uploads/2019/07/American-Well-Telehealth-Index-2019-Consumer-Survey-eBook2.pdf . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Rubin R. Medicare Advantage expands telehealth services. JAMA. 2019;321:1964.
Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and health care’s digital revolution. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:e82e82.
Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1679–1681.
Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27:1132–1135.
Tanaka MJ, Oh LS, Martin SD, Berkson EM. Telemedicine in the era of COVID-19: the virtual orthopaedic examination. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:e57.
Hakim S, Ahmed K, El-Menyar A, et al. Patterns and management of degloving injuries: a single national level 1 trauma center experience. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:35.
Vyas KS, Hambrick HR, Shakir A, et al. A systematic review of the use of telemedicine in plastic and reconstructive surgery and dermatology. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:736–768.
Funderburk CD, Batulis NS, Zelones JT, et al. Innovations in the plastic surgery care pathway: using telemedicine for clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:507–516.
Saad NH, AlQattan HT, Ochoa O, Chrysopoulo M. Telemedicine and plastic and reconstructive surgery: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and directions for the future. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:680e–683e.
Armstrong A, Jeevaratnam J, Murphy G, et al. A plastic surgery service response to COVID-19 in one of the largest teaching hospitals in Europe. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73:1174–1205.
Russo JE, McCool RR, Davies L. VA Telemedicine: an analysis of cost and time savings. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22:209–215.
Paquette S, Lin JC. Outpatient telemedicine program in vascular surgery reduces patient travel time, cost, and environmental pollutant emissions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;59:167–172.
Chauhan V, Galwankar S, Arquilla B, et al. Novel coronavirus (COVID-19): leveraging telemedicine to optimize care while minimizing exposures and viral transmission. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020;13:20–24.
Lorence D, Park H. Group disparities and health information: a study of online access for the underserved. Health Informatics J. 2008;14:29–38.
Barnett ML, Ray KN, Souza J, Mehrotra A. Trends in telemedicine use in a large commercially insured population, 2005-2017. JAMA. 2018;320:21472147.
Wilcock AD, Rose S, Busch AB, et al. Association between broadband internet availability and telemedicine use. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:15801580.
Nouri S, Khoong EC, Lyles CR, Karliner L. Addressing equity in telemedicine for chronic disease management during the Covid-19 pandemic. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. Published online May 4, 2020. Available at: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0123 . Accessed June 28, 2020.
doi: 10.1056/CAT.20.0123
Pew Research Center. Core trends survey. Published June 13, 2019. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/Internet/dataset/core-trends-survey . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Pew Research Center. About Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/about . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Pew Research Center. U.S. survey methodology. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/our-methods/u-s-surveys/u-s-survey-methodology . Accessed July 5, 2021.
US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Salehi PP, Torabi SJ, Lee YH, Azizzadeh B. Telemedicine practices of facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons in the United States: the effect of novel coronavirus-19. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22:464–470.
Loeb AE, Rao SS, Ficke JR, Morris CD, Riley LH, Levin AS. Departmental experience and lessons learned with accelerated introduction of telemedicine during the COVID-19 crisis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:e469–e476.
Contreras CM, Metzger GA, Beane JD, Dedhia PH, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Telemedicine: patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:1692–1697.
Ajibade A, Younas H, Pullan M, Harky A. Telemedicine in cardiovascular surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and our experience. J Card Surg. 2020;35:2773–2784.
Shippee TP, Kozhimannil KB, Rowan K, Virnig BA. Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24:e261–e269.
Brown ZD, Bey AK, Bonfield CM, et al. Racial disparities in health care access among pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18:269–274.
Bauder AR, Gross CP, Killelea BK, Butler PD, Kovach SJ, Fox JP. The relationship between geographic access to plastic surgeons and breast reconstruction rates among women undergoing mastectomy for cancer. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:324–329.
Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, Chang RW. Gender and ethnic/racial disparities in health care utilization among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57:S221–S233.
Tsai H-YS, Shillair R, Cotten SR. Social support and “playing around”: an examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. J Appl Gerontol. 2017;36:29–55.
Jaeger PT, Bertot JC, Thompson KM, Katz SM, DeCoster EJ. The intersection of public policy and public access: digital divides, digital literacy, digital inclusion, and public libraries. Public Library Q. 2012;31:1–20.
Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:154–161.
Norris P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans’ internet access: 2000-2015. Published June 26, 2015. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/Internet/2015/06/26/americans-Internet-access-2000-2015 . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Rainie L. Digital divides 2015. Published September 22, 2015. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/Internet/2015/09/22/digital-divides-2015 . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Hardiker NR, Grant MJ. Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:1–12.
Yu RP, Ellison NB, McCammon RJ, Langa KM. Mapping the two levels of digital divide: Internet access and social network site adoption among older adults in the USA. Inf Commun Soc. 2016;19:1445–1464.
Fairlie RW. Have we finally bridged the digital divide? Smart phone and internet use patterns by race and ethnicity. First Monday. Published online September 1, 2017.
Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/Internet/fact-sheet/mobile . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Douglas MD, Xu J, Heggs A, Wrenn G, Mack DH, Rust G. Assessing telemedicine utilization by using Medicaid claims data. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68:173–178.
Liu JH, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, et al. Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA. 2006;296:19731973.
Mauro V, Lorenzo M, Paolo C, Sergio H. Treat all COVID 19-positive patients, but do not forget those negative with chronic diseases. Intern Emerg Med. 2020;15:787–790.
Schlessinger J, Schlessinger D, Schlessinger B. Prospective demographic study of cosmetic surgery patients. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3:30–35.
Wozniak AM, Rallis KS, Elkaddoum R. Telemedicine health disparities in oncology care. Future Oncol. 2021;17:1695–1698.
Gardiner S, Hartzell TL. Telemedicine and plastic surgery: a review of its applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:e47–e53.
Federal Communications Commission. 2015 Broadband progress report. Published February 4, 2015. Available at: https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/reports/broadband-progress-reports/2015-broadband-progress-report . Accessed June 28, 2020.
Miller CC. Fighting homelessness, one smartphone at a time. The New York Times. Published April 14, 2015. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/15/upshot/fighting-homelessness-one-smartphone-at-a-time.html .
Federal Communications Commission. Lifeline support for affordable communications. Published March 4, 2016. Available at: https://www.fcc.gov/lifeline-consumers . Accessed July 12, 2020.
Cline RJW, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671–692.
Castilla D, Botella C, Miralles I, et al. Teaching digital literacy skills to the elderly using a social network with linear navigation: a case study in a rural area. Int J Hum-Comput Stud. 2018;118:24–37.
Lyles CR, Tieu L, Sarkar U, et al. A randomized trial to train vulnerable primary care patients to use a patient portal. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32:248–258.
van Veen T, Binz S, Muminovic M, et al. Potential of mobile health technology to reduce health disparities in underserved communities. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20:799–802.
Graboyes E, Cramer J, Balakrishnan K, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and health care disparities in head and neck cancer: scanning the horizon. Head Neck. 2020;42:1555–1559.
Keeter S, Hatley N, Kennedy C, Lau A. What low response rates mean for telephone surveys. Published May 15, 2017. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2017/05/15/what-low-response-rates-mean-for-telephone-surveys .