Moving beyond narrow definitions of gene drive: Diverse perspectives and frames enable substantive dialogue among science and humanities teachers in the United States and United Kingdom.

definitions focus groups framing gene drive public debate science communication

Journal

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
ISSN: 1361-6609
Titre abrégé: Public Underst Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
medline: 21 7 2023
pubmed: 7 2 2023
entrez: 6 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Gene drive is an emerging biotechnology with applications in global health, conservation and agriculture. Scientists are preparing for field trials, triggering debate about when and how to release gene-drive organisms. These decisions depend on public understandings of gene drive, which are shaped by language. While some studies on gene drive communication assume the need to persuade publics of expert definitions of gene drive, we highlight the importance of meaning-making in communication and engagement. We conducted focus groups with humanities and science teachers in the United Kingdom and United States to explore how different media framings stimulated discussions of gene drive. We found diversity in the value of these framings for public debate. Interestingly, the definition favoured by gene drive scientists was the least popular among participants. Rather than carefully curating language, we need opportunities for publics to make sense and negotiate the meanings of a technology on their own terms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36744384
doi: 10.1177/09636625221148697
pmc: PMC10363919
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

727-744

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Community Genet. 2006;9(3):211-20
pubmed: 16741352
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 8;117(49):30864-30867
pubmed: 33208534
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 18;286(1917):20191484
pubmed: 31847781
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Apr 25;13(4):e0007286
pubmed: 31022177
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Apr 25;13(4):e0007233
pubmed: 31022169
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;276:113850
pubmed: 33839526
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10565-7
pubmed: 26272924
New Genet Soc. 2022 Jan 12;41(1):3-22
pubmed: 35722062
EMBO Rep. 2016 Apr;17(4):481-5
pubmed: 26988254
CRISPR J. 2021 Feb;4(1):19-24
pubmed: 33571044
Glob Public Health. 2020 Oct;15(10):1551-1565
pubmed: 32589115
Science. 2007 Apr 6;316(5821):56
pubmed: 17412941
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Nov 5;20(1):273
pubmed: 33153449
Sci Adv. 2019 Sep 11;5(9):eaau8462
pubmed: 31535017
Science. 2020 Dec 18;370(6523):1417-1419
pubmed: 33335055
Sci Commun. 2022 Apr;44(2):143-168
pubmed: 35449796
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):156
pubmed: 34372763
Science. 2017 Dec 1;358(6367):1135-1136
pubmed: 29191896

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH