Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation.
conjoint experiment
content moderation
harmful content
moral dilemma
online speech
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 02 2023
14 02 2023
Historique:
entrez:
7
2
2023
pubmed:
8
2
2023
medline:
10
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In online content moderation, two key values may come into conflict: protecting freedom of expression and preventing harm. Robust rules based in part on how citizens think about these moral dilemmas are necessary to deal with this conflict in a principled way, yet little is known about people's judgments and preferences around content moderation. We examined such moral dilemmas in a conjoint survey experiment where US respondents (
Identifiants
pubmed: 36749721
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210666120
pmc: PMC9963596
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2210666120Références
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8
pubmed: 11557895
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):59-64
pubmed: 30356211
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 May;26(5):388-405
pubmed: 35365430
Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):1251722
pubmed: 25146296
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6
pubmed: 27339987
Am Polit Sci Rev. 2019 Aug;113(3):838-859
pubmed: 32855557
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348
pubmed: 33547453
Polit Behav. 2022 Jul 22;:1-24
pubmed: 35909894