Impact of 18 F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Findings on Failure-Free Survival in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Salvage Radiation Therapy.


Journal

Clinical nuclear medicine
ISSN: 1536-0229
Titre abrégé: Clin Nucl Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7611109

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 04 2024
pubmed: 9 2 2023
medline: 4 3 2023
entrez: 8 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We aimed to evaluate the impact of 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging on failure-free survival (FFS) post-salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence. Seventy-nine patients were recruited in a phase 2/3 clinical trial to undergo 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT before SRT for PCa. Four patients with extrapelvic disease were excluded. All patients were followed up at regular intervals up to 48 months. Treatment failure was defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen level of ≥0.2 ng/mL above the nadir after SRT, confirmed with an additional measurement, requiring systemic treatment or clinical progression. Failure-free survival was computed and compared between patients grouped according to 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging findings. Eighty percent (60/75) of patients had a positive finding on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT, of which 56.7% (34/60) had prostate bed-only uptake, whereas 43.3% (26/60) had pelvic nodal ± bed uptake. Following SRT, disease failure was detected in 36% (27/75) of patients. There was a significant difference in FFS between patients who had a positive versus negative scan (62.3% vs 92.9% [ P < 0.001] at 36 months and 59.4% vs 92.9% [ P < 0.001] at 48 months). Similarly, there was a significant difference in FFS between patients with uptake in pelvic nodes ± bed versus prostate bed only at 36 months (49.8% vs 70.7%; P = 0.003) and at 48 months (49.8% vs 65.6%; P = 0.040). Failure-free survival was also significantly higher in patients with either negative PET/CT or prostate bed-only disease versus those with pelvic nodal ± prostate bed disease at 36 (78% vs 49.8%, P < 0.001) and 48 months (74.4% vs 49.8%, P < 0.001). Findings on pre-SRT 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging, even when acted upon to optimize the treatment decisions and treatment planning, are predictive of post-SRT FFS in men who experience PCa recurrence after radical prostatectomy. A negative 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT is most predictive of a lower risk of failure, whereas the presence of pelvic nodal recurrence portends a higher risk of SRT failure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36754362
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004590
pii: 00003072-202304000-00030
pmc: PMC9992149
mid: NIHMS1862592
doi:

Substances chimiques

fluciclovine F-18 38R1Q0L1ZE
Carboxylic Acids 0
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e153-e159

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA169188
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: A.B.J. reports personal fees from Blue Earth Diagnostics for advisory board services outside the submitted work. M.G. is entitled to a royalty derived from sale of products related to the research described in this report. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The research consent forms state that he is entitled to a share of sales royalty received by Emory University from Nihon MediPhysics under that agreement. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. D.M.S. participates through the Emory University Office of Sponsored Projects in sponsored grants including those funded or partially funded by Blue Earth Diagnostics, Nihon MediPhysics, Telix Pharmaceuticals (US), Advanced Accelerator Applications, FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals USA, and Amgen. D.M.S. also reports consultant fees outside the submitted work from Syncona, AIM Specialty Health, Global Medical Solutions Taiwan, and Progenics Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declare no competing interests. The EMPIRE-1 trial received funding from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (R01 CA16918), Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd, and the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Références

Magnetta MJ, Casalino D, Heller MT. Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY) . 2020;45:4073–4083.
Zaorsky NG, Calais J, Fanti S, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol . 2021;18:643–668.
Kane CJ, Amling CL, Johnstone PA, et al. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Urology . 2003;61:607–611.
De Visschere PJL, Standaert C, Fütterer JJ, et al. A systematic review on the role of imaging in early recurrent prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol . 2019;2:47–76.
Evangelista L, Briganti A, Fanti S, et al. New clinical indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, new tracers for positron emission tomography and a promising hybrid device for prostate cancer staging: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol . 2016;70:161–175.
Nanni C, Zanoni L, Pultrone C, et al. (18)F-FACBC (anti1-amino-3-(18)F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) versus (11)C-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer relapse: results of a prospective trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2016;43:1601–1610.
Ma W, Mao J, Yang J, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol . 2022;32:7374–7385.
Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. Assessment of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol . 2019;5:856–863.
Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, et al. Detection efficacy of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med . 2019;60:362–368.
Rowe SP, Campbell SP, Mana-Ay M, et al. Prospective evaluation of PSMA-targeted 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med . 2020;61:58–61.
Oka S, Okudaira H, Yoshida Y, et al. Transport mechanisms of trans -1-amino-3-fluoro[1-(14)C]cyclobutanecarboxylic acid in prostate cancer cells. Nucl Med Biol . 2012;39:109–119.
Ono M, Oka S, Okudaira H, et al. [(14)C]Fluciclovine (alias anti-[(14)C]FACBC) uptake and ASCT2 expression in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. Nucl Med Biol . 2015;42:887–892.
Marcus C, Abiodun-Ojo OA, Jani AB, et al. Clinical utility of 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer with very low (≤0.3 ng/mL) prostate-specific antigen levels. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2021;11:406–414.
Bulbul JE, Grybowski D, Lovrec P, et al. Positivity rate of [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer recurrence at PSA levels below 1 ng/mL. Mol Imaging Biol . 2022;24:42–49.
Salavati A, Gencturk M, Koksel Y, et al. A bicentric retrospective analysis of clinical utility of 18 F-fluciclovine PET in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following primary radiation therapy: is it helpful in patients with a PSA rise less than the Phoenix criteria? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2021;48:4463–4471.
Schuster DM, Nanni C, Fanti S, et al. Anti–1-amino-3- 18 F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid: physiologic uptake patterns, incidental findings, and variants that may simulate disease. J Nucl Med . 2014;55:1986–1992.
Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer—updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol . 2020;77:403–417.
Alberts IL, Seide SE, Mingels C, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2021;48:2978–2989.
Emmett L, Tang R, Nandurkar R, et al. 3-Year freedom from progression after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-triaged management in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multicenter trial. J Nucl Med . 2020;61:866–872.
Jani AB, Schreibmann E, Goyal S, et al. 18 F-fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging alone to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer (EMPIRE-1): a single centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet . 2021;397:1895–1904.
Abiodun-Ojo OA, Jani AB, Akintayo AA, et al. Salvage radiotherapy management decisions in postprostatectomy patients with recurrent prostate cancer based on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT guidance. J Nucl Med . 2021;62:1089–1096.
McConathy J, Voll RJ, Yu W, et al. Improved synthesis of anti-[ 18 F]FACBC: improved preparation of labeling precursor and automated radiosynthesis. Appl Radiat Isot . 2003;58:657–666.
Tendulkar RD, Agrawal S, Gao T, et al. Contemporary update of a multi-institutional predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol . 2016;34:3648–3654.
Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data . New York, NY: Springer; 2003.
Ong S, Pascoe C, Kelly BD, et al. PSMA PET-CT imaging predicts treatment progression in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer—a prospective study of men with 3 year follow up. Cancers (Basel) . 2022;14:2717.
Chu CE, Alshalalfa M, Sjöström M, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fluciclovine transporter genes are associated with variable clinical features and molecular subtypes of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol . 2021;79:717–721.
Calais J, Czernin J, Cao M, et al. 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT mapping of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in 270 patients with a PSA level of less than 1.0 ng/mL: impact on salvage radiotherapy planning. J Nucl Med . 2018;59:230–237.
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, et al. Outcome after PSMA-PET/CT–based salvage radiotherapy for nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2022;49:1417–1428.
Vogel MME, Dewes S, Sage EK, et al. Feasibility and outcome of PSMA-PET–based dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy versus conventional salvage radiotherapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Front Oncol . 2021;11:715020.
Eade T, Kneebone A, Hruby G, et al. Early outcomes and decision regret using PSMA/MRI-guided focal boost for prostate cancer SBRT. Pract Radiat Oncol . 2022;12:e201–e206.
Gawish A, Walke M, Röllich B, et al. Nodal and osseous oligometastatic prostate cancer: a cohort including the introduction of PSMA-PET/CT–guided stereotactic and hypofractionated radiotherapy with elective nodal therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol . 2022. doi:10.1007/s00432-022-04229-1 . Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04229-1

Auteurs

Charles Marcus (C)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

David M Schuster (DM)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Subir Goyal (S)

Biostatics Shared Resource.

Omotayo A Adediran (OA)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Vishal R Dhere (VR)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Shreyas S Joshi (SS)

Department of Urology, Emory University.

Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo (OA)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Viraj A Master (VA)

Department of Urology, Emory University.

Pretesh R Patel (PR)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Bridget Fielder (B)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Mark Goodman (M)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Joseph W Shelton (JW)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Omer Kucuk (O)

Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Bruce Hershatter (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Raghuveer K Halkar (RK)

From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Ashesh B Jani (AB)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH