Identifying drugs with the greatest increases and decreases in spending per beneficiary using Medicare Part D: A cross-sectional study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
04
07
2022
accepted:
15
01
2023
entrez:
9
2
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
medline:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the US, there are no effective regulations controlling how much the price of a medication can increase. A patchwork of studies examining the reasons for soaring prices has focused on medications that have received considerable media attention, like insulin, epinephrine, and colchicine. To identify the 50 medications with the greatest increase in average spending per beneficiary and the 50 medications with the greatest decrease in average spending per beneficiary, and to identify the factors associated with spending increases. This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program from 2014 to 2020. We included drugs dispensed to > 1000 beneficiaries in each study year and excluded those primarily administered intravenously. Percentage change in average spending per beneficiary from 2014 to 2020 was calculated for each drug. For each drug, we extracted the number of beneficiaries, the number of manufacturers, and the drug-specific total annual spending reported in the Medicare Part D data set. An online database search was conducted to identify the primary clinical indication, the availability of any generic versions, and the date of FDA approval for each drug. The 50 medications with the greatest increase in spending per beneficiary had a median increase of 362.4% (interquartile range [IQR]: 286.6%-563.0%), with a cumulative spending of almost $5 billion in 2020 alone. Most drugs with the greatest increases in spending per beneficiary had generic versions available (68%) and were approved by the FDA over 10 years ago (66%). Medications with the greatest increase in spending per beneficiary had a median of 1 manufacturer (IQR: 1-2), while medications with the greatest decrease in spending per beneficiary had a median of 9.5 manufacturers (IQR: 5-14). This study identified rapidly increasing costs of medications under Medicare Part D. Our findings demonstrate that off-patent medications can skyrocket in price, especially when there are few manufacturers of a given medication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36758003
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281076
pii: PONE-D-22-17540
pmc: PMC9910683
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prescription Drugs
0
Drugs, Generic
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0281076Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Hodzic-Santor et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2129-30
pubmed: 26513309
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;47(1):177-182
pubmed: 30994060
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):305-306
pubmed: 28114637
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1266
pubmed: 27673458
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e210626
pubmed: 36218748
JAMA. 2016 Aug 23-30;316(8):858-71
pubmed: 27552619
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):650-656
pubmed: 30140875
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):287-288
pubmed: 33252611
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1793-1795
pubmed: 31693804
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2597-2598
pubmed: 29281576
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):885-886
pubmed: 29799949