Prevalence and Mode of Birth in Late Fetal Mortality in Spain, 2016-2019.
cesarean birth
late fetal mortality
mode of birth
stillbirth
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 01 2023
18 01 2023
Historique:
received:
10
11
2022
revised:
11
01
2023
accepted:
17
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
15
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: The rate of cesarean sections in late fetal mortality remains high. We aimed to determine the prevalence of late fetal mortality in Spain and risk factors for cesarean birth in women with stillbirth ≥ 28 weeks gestation between 2016-2019. (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study with national data between 2016-2019. A total of 3504 births with fetal dead were included. Sociodemographic, obstetrical and neonatal variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression (MLR), with cesarean birth with a stillborn ≥ 28 weeks gestation as the dependent variable. (3) Results: The late fetal mortality rate was 2.8 × 1000; 22.7% of births were by cesarean section. Factors associated with cesarean were having a multiple birth (aOR 6.78); stillbirth weight (aOR 2.41); birth taking place in towns with over 50,000 inhabitants (aOR 1.34); and mother's age ≥ 35 (aOR 1.23). (4) Conclusions: The late fetal mortality rate increased during the period. The performance of cesarean sections was associated with the mother's age, obstetric factors and place of birth. Our findings encourage reflection on how to best put into practice national clinical and socio-educational prevention strategies, as well as the approved protocols on how childbirth should be correctly conducted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36767143
pii: ijerph20031777
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031777
pmc: PMC9914757
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Maedica (Bucur). 2017 Jun;12(2):101-105
pubmed: 29090029
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Nov;(169):1-8
pubmed: 25408960
Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1448-63
pubmed: 21496911
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 29;17(5):
pubmed: 32121364
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 21;18(16):
pubmed: 34444565
Contraception. 2009 Apr;79(4):259-71
pubmed: 19272495
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):212-224
pubmed: 29193794
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):693-698
pubmed: 28333794
South Med J. 2021 Jul;114(7):384-387
pubmed: 34215888
Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):691-702
pubmed: 26794070
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1415-1420
pubmed: 29468309
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Jun;15(6):380-7
pubmed: 15280109
South Med J. 2020 Dec;113(12):623-628
pubmed: 33263130
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 May 1;100(5):352-354
pubmed: 35521038
PLoS One. 2013 May 20;8(5):e64869
pubmed: 23700489
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603
pubmed: 26794078
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 May;1(2):156-164.e2
pubmed: 33345821
J Perinat Med. 2021 Feb 23;50(6):814-821
pubmed: 33629576
Lancet. 2006 May 6;367(9521):1487-94
pubmed: 16679161