Exploring the psychometric properties of the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and Kidscreen10, self-reported by adolescents with intellectual disability.
Adolescent
Health-related quality of life
Intellectual disability
Mental wellbeing
Psychometric properties
Self-report
Journal
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR
ISSN: 1365-2788
Titre abrégé: J Intellect Disabil Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9206090
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
revised:
19
01
2023
received:
24
11
2022
accepted:
24
01
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
15
2
2023
entrez:
14
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are no validated self-report measures that can be used to assess health and wellbeing in adolescents with intellectual disability (ID). The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of two newly adapted self-report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental wellbeing measures: the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (ID-SWEMWBS) and Kidscreen10 (ID-Kidscreen10). For this, we used data from a sample of 427 adolescents (aged 11-19) with ID recruited from special school settings. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to validate the factor structure of both measures. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability was analysed using intra-class correlation coefficients. The internal consistency measured using Cronbach's alpha was found to be in the range of 0.70-0.78, test-retest reliabilities were expressed using intra-class correlation coefficients that were found to be high for both measures (ID-SWEMWBS, 0.758; ID-Kidscreen10, 0.723), and the CFA supported the unidimensional structure of both measures. The results of this study indicate that the ID-SWEMWBS and ID-Kidscreen10 have very good psychometric properties and can be used as self-report measures to assess HRQoL and mental wellbeing in adolescents with ID.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There are no validated self-report measures that can be used to assess health and wellbeing in adolescents with intellectual disability (ID).
METHOD
The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of two newly adapted self-report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental wellbeing measures: the Intellectual Disability versions of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (ID-SWEMWBS) and Kidscreen10 (ID-Kidscreen10). For this, we used data from a sample of 427 adolescents (aged 11-19) with ID recruited from special school settings.
RESULTS
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to validate the factor structure of both measures. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability was analysed using intra-class correlation coefficients. The internal consistency measured using Cronbach's alpha was found to be in the range of 0.70-0.78, test-retest reliabilities were expressed using intra-class correlation coefficients that were found to be high for both measures (ID-SWEMWBS, 0.758; ID-Kidscreen10, 0.723), and the CFA supported the unidimensional structure of both measures.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study indicate that the ID-SWEMWBS and ID-Kidscreen10 have very good psychometric properties and can be used as self-report measures to assess HRQoL and mental wellbeing in adolescents with ID.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
415-426Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Akoglu H. (2018) User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 18, 91-93.
Allerton L. A., Welch V. & Emerson E. (2011) Health inequalities experienced by children and young people with intellectual disabilities: A review of literature from the United Kingdom. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities: JOID 15, 269-278.
Anthony R., Moore G., Page N., Hewitt G., Murphy S. & Melendez-Torres G. J. (2022) Measurement invariance of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale and latent mean differences (SWEMWBS) in young people by current care status. Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 31, 205-213.
Boström P., Åsberg J., Thorson M. & Broberg M. (2016) Subjective mental health, peer relations, family, and school environment in adolescents with intellectual developmental disorder: A first report of a new questionnaire administered on tablet PCs. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities 9, 207-231.
Braun V. & Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77-101.
Buckley N., Glasson E. J., Chen W., Epstein A., Leonard H., Skoss R. et al. (2020) Prevalence estimates of mental health problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 54, 970-984.
Comrey A. L. & Lee H. B. (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Psychology Press.
Cui Y., Stapleton F. & Suttle C. (2008) Developing an instrument to assess vision-related and subjective quality of life in children with intellectual disability: data collection and preliminary analysis in a Chinese population. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics: The Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) 28, 238-246.
Cui Y., Stapleton F., Suttle C. & Bundy A. (2010) Health- and vision-related quality of life in intellectually disabled children. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 87, 37-44.
Davison J., Maguire S., McLaughlin M. & Simms V. (2022) Involving children with intellectual disability in the adaptation of self-reported health and wellbeing measures: Participatory research and methodological considerations. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 66, 628-641.
Emerson E. (2021) Inequalities and inequities in the health of people with intellectual disabilities. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of global public health. Oxford University Press.
Emerson E., Felce D. & Stancliffe R. J. (2013) Issues concerning self-report data and population-based data sets involving people with intellectual disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 51, 333-348.
Frey G. C., Stanish H. I. & Temple V. A. (2008) Physical activity of youth with intellectual disability: Review and research agenda. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 25, 95-117.
Frey G. C., Temple V. A. & Stanish H. I. (2017) Interventions to promote physical activity for youth with intellectual disabilities. Salud Pública de México 59, 437-445.
Fung S. (2019) Psychometric evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) with Chinese university students. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 17, 46.
Hamdani Y., Yee T., Rowland E., & McPherson A. C. (2018) Examining wellness in children and youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review. Current Developmental Disorders Reports 5, 165-196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-018-0146-1
Haver A., Akerjordet K., Caputi P., Furunes T. & Magee C. (2015) Measuring mental well-being: A validation of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale in Norwegian and Swedish. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 43, 721-727.
Ikeda E., Krägeloh C., Water T. & Hinckson E. A. (2016) An exploratory study of self-reported quality of life in children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Child Indicators Research, 9, 133-153. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9307-5
Ingerski L. M., Modi A. C., Hood K. K., Pai A. L., Zeller M., Piazza-Waggoner C. et al. (2010) Health-related quality of life across pediatric chronic conditions. The Journal of Pediatrics 156, 639-644.
Kwasnicka D., Kale D., Schneider V., Keller J., Yeboah-Asiamah B., Powell D. et al. (2021) Systematic review of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies of five public health-related behaviours: review protocol. BMJ Open 11, e046435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046435
Lereya S. T., Patalay P. & Deighton J. (2022) Predictors of mental health difficulties and subjective wellbeing in adolescents: A longitudinal study. JCPP Advances 2, e12074.
Longo E., Badia M., Orgaz M. B. & Gómez-Vela M. (2017) Comparing parent and child reports of health-related quality of life and their relationship with leisure participation in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities 71, 214-222.
Maguire S., Davison J., McLaughlin M., Simms V., & Bunting B. (2023). Exploring the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A COSMIN Systematic Review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities.
Maïano C., Bégarie J., Morin A. J. & Ninot G. (2009) Assessment of physical self-concept in adolescents with intellectual disability: Content and factor validity of the very short form of the physical self-inventory. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 39, 775-787.
Maïano C., Morin A. J., Bégarie J. & Ninot G. (2011) The intellectual disability version of the very short form of the physical self-inventory (PSI-VS-ID): Cross-validation and measurement invariance across gender, weight, age and intellectual disability level. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32, 1652-1662.
Matos M. G. D., Gaspar T. & Simões C. (2012) Health-related quality of life in Portuguese children and adolescents. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 25, 230-237.
Melendez-Torres G. J., Hewitt G., Hallingberg B., Anthony R., Collishaw S., Hall J. et al. (2019) Measurement invariance properties and external construct validity of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale in a large national sample of secondary school students in Wales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 17, 139.
Morrow A. M., Hayen A., Quine S., Scheinberg A. & Craig J. C. (2011) A comparison of doctors', parents' and children's reports of health states and health-related quality of life in children with chronic conditions. Child: Care, Health and Development 38, 186-195.
Muthén B. O. & Satorra A. (1995) Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. In: Sociological methodology 1995 (ed. P. Marsden), vol. 25, pp. 216-316. Blackwell, Boston, MA.
Nik-Azin A., Shairi M. R., Naeinian M. R. & Sadeghpour A. (2014) The health-related quality of life index KIDSCREEN-10: Confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and reliability in a sample of Iranian students. Child Indicators Research 7, 407-420.
Noonan R. J., Boddy L. M., Fairclough S. J. & Knowles Z. R. (2016) Write, draw, show, and tell: A child-centred dual methodology to explore perceptions of out-of-school physical activity. BMC Public Health 16, 326.
Parry T. S. (1992) The effectiveness of early intervention: A critical review. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 28, 343-346.
Ravens-Sieberer U., Erhart M., Rajmil L., Herdman M., Auquier P., Bruil J. et al. (2010) European KIDSCREEN Group Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 19, 1487-1500. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5
Ravens-Sieberer U., Gosch A., Erhart M., Rueden U., Nickel J., Kurth B. et al. (2006) The KIDSCREEN questionnaires - Handbook. THE KIDSCREEN GROUP EUROPE. Pabst Science Publishers. Available at: https://s2f1ad284f5ffc52e.jimcontent.com/download/version/1494315548/module/11487374212/name/KIDSCREEN_manual_English.pdf
Ravens-Sieberer U., Gosch A., Rajmil L., Erhart M., Bruil J., Duer W. et al. (2005) KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 5, 353-364.
Ravens-Sieberer U., Herdman M., Devine J., Otto C., Bullinger M., Rose M. et al. (2014) The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 23, 791-803. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3
Ringdal R., Bradley Eilertsen M. E., Bjørnsen H. N., Espnes G. A. & Moksnes U. K. (2018) Validation of two versions of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale among Norwegian adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 46, 718-725.
Scott J., Wishart J. & Currie C. (2011) Including children with intellectual disabilities/special educational needs into national child health surveys: A pilot study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 24, 437-449.
Shevell M. (2008) Global developmental delay and mental retardation or intellectual disability: conceptualization, evaluation, and etiology. Pediatric clinics of North America 55, 1071-1084. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2008.07.010
Shier H. (2010). Pathways to Participation revisited: Learning from Nicaragua’s child coffee workers. In: A handbook of children and young people’s participation (eds. N. Thomas & B. Percy-Smith), pp. 215-227. Routledge, Abingdon.
Smith O., Alves D. E., Knapstad M., Haug E. & Aarø L. E. (2017) Measuring mental well-being in Norway: validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS). BMC Psychiatry 17, 182.
Stewart-Brown S., Tennant A., Tennant R., Platt S., Parkinson J. & Weich S. (2009) Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 7, 15.
Tennant R., Hiller L., Fishwick R., Platt S., Joseph S., Weich S. et al. (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 5, 63.
The KIDSCREEN Group Europe (2006) The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires: Quality of life Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents Handbook. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich.
Upton P., Lawford J. & Eiser C. (2008) Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: A review of the literature. Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 17, 895-913.
White-Koning M., Arnaud C., Bourdet-Loubère S., Bazex H., Colver A. & Grandjean H. (2005) Subjective quality of life in children with intellectual impairment--How can it be assessed? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 47, 281-285.
Wiedemann A., Stochl J., Neufeld S. A., Fritz J., Bhatti J., Hook R. W. et al. (2022) The impact of the initial COVID-19 outbreak on young adults' mental health: A longitudinal study of risk and resilience factors. Scientific Reports 12, 16659.
Williams D. L. & Minshew N. J. (2010) How the brain thinks in autism: Implications for language intervention. ASHA Leader 15, 8-11.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018) ACTIVE: a technical package for increasing physical activity. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC -SA 3.0 IGO WHO, Global Action Plan for physical activity 2018-2030. Resolution WHA71.6. Geneva.