Safety of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis as used in clinical practice: results from the ARTIS programme.
Antirheumatic Agents
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Biological Therapy
Cardiovascular Diseases
Epidemiology
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
13
12
2022
accepted:
02
02
2023
medline:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
15
2
2023
entrez:
14
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Longitudinal clinical registry-infrastructures such as Anti-Rheumatic Therapies in Sweden (ARTIS) allow simultaneous comparison of the safety of individual immunomodulatory drugs used in clinical practice, with consistent definitions of treatment cohorts, follow-up and outcomes. Our objective was to assess and compare incidence rates of key safety outcomes for individual targeted synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), updating previous reports and including newer treatments including Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Nationwide register-based cohort study including all patients with RA in Sweden registered as starting any b/tsDMARD 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2020, followed until 30 June 2021 (N=20 117). The incidence rates of selected outcomes, identified through national healthcare registers, were compared between individual b/tsDMARDs, adjusted for confounding by demographics, RA disease characteristics and comorbidity. There were marked differences in treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (rates per 1000 person-years ranged from 18 on rituximab to 57 on tofacitinib), but few significant differences were observed for the serious adverse events under study. Neither cardiovascular events nor general serious infections were more frequent on baricitinib or tofacitinib versus bDMARDs, but JAKi were associated with higher rates of hospital-treated herpes zoster (HR vs etanercept, 3.82 (95% CI 2.05 to 7.09) and 4.00 (1.59 to 10.06)). Low number of events limited some comparisons, in particular for sarilumab and tofacitinib. Data from ARTIS supports that the b/tsDMARDs currently used to treat RA have acceptable and largely similar safety profiles, but differences exist in particular concerning tolerability and specific infection risks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36787994
pii: ard-2022-223762
doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223762
pmc: PMC10176333
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Biological Products
0
Janus Kinase Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
601-610Investigateurs
Gerd-Marie Ahlenius
(GM)
Eva Baecklund
(E)
Katerina Chatzidionysiou
(K)
Nils Feltelius
(N)
Helena Forsblad-d'Elia
(H)
Alf Kastbom
(A)
Lars Klareskog
(L)
Elisabet Lindqvist
(E)
Ulf Lindström
(U)
Carl Turesson
(C)
Christopher Sjöwall
(C)
Johan Askling
(J)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: The ARTIS project is supported by agreements between Karolinska Institutet (with JA as PI) and the listed entities, mainly for the national safety monitoring of rheumatology immunomodulators in Sweden (ARTIS): Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi. TF, HB, DDG and BD are partly employed by the ARTIS project. EL, MM, NF, UL and HFdE report no conflict of interest.
Références
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):1810-1818
pubmed: 34324640
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Aug 1;58(8):1510-1511
pubmed: 31056707
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Nov;64 Suppl 4:iv42-3
pubmed: 16239385
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jan;50(1):204-13
pubmed: 21084326
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):e65
pubmed: 27502892
Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Dec;12(2):225-9
pubmed: 22796281
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 May;67(5):731-6
pubmed: 25201241
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;34(5 Suppl 101):S79-S86
pubmed: 27762200
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Nov 18;4(6):e229
pubmed: 32010855
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):258-65
pubmed: 25975452
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020 Jan;188:172838
pubmed: 31837338
Ups J Med Sci. 2017 Jun;122(2):136-147
pubmed: 28276780
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 19;13:533-554
pubmed: 34321928
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Feb;82(2):189-197
pubmed: 36150749
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):81-94
pubmed: 36410794
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;32(5 Suppl 85):S-147-9
pubmed: 25365105
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jun;81(6):789-797
pubmed: 35318218
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):689-705
pubmed: 35092329
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):245-252
pubmed: 29327451
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Oct 6;61(10):3952-3962
pubmed: 35134119
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;78(3):320-327
pubmed: 30612115
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jan;81(1):41-47
pubmed: 34321218
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Feb;74(2):354-60
pubmed: 24285495
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):650-657
pubmed: 29237621
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 27;386(4):316-326
pubmed: 35081280
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):3-18
pubmed: 36357155
Scand J Rheumatol. 2015;44(1):22-8
pubmed: 25379815
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):895-900
pubmed: 22887849
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Apr;53:151979
pubmed: 35183936
BMJ. 2020 Nov 11;371:m3900
pubmed: 33177059
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):846-848
pubmed: 32111583
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Mar;55(3):523-34
pubmed: 26490106
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:737-742
pubmed: 27822121
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1057-1063
pubmed: 28031164
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Oct 1;58(10):1755-1766
pubmed: 30982883
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):95-106
pubmed: 36368906
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Jul;20(7):815-826
pubmed: 33843379
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79
pubmed: 26238958
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;69(6):1154-1164
pubmed: 28245350
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):184-191
pubmed: 31589278
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Mar 1;59(3):505-512
pubmed: 31504942