An early experience in robotic ileoanal pouch surgery with robotic intracorporeal single-stapled anastomosis (RiSSA) at a tertiary referral centre.


Journal

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
revised: 30 01 2023
received: 24 11 2022
accepted: 31 01 2023
medline: 28 6 2023
pubmed: 23 2 2023
entrez: 22 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A robotic approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery offers advantages over other approaches in terms of precision, improved access to the pelvis and less muscular fatigue for the surgeon. The integrity of the anastomosis is also fundamental to successful IPAA surgery. The robotic platform can permit intracorporeal suturing deep within the pelvis to create a single-stapled, double purse-string anastomosis, which may reduce the risk of anastomotic complications. This study describes the safety and early outcomes of robotic intracorporeal single-stapled anastomosis (RiSSA) amongst patients operated consecutively at a tertiary centre immediately before and following the pandemic. A retrospective study of prospectively collected data analysing the outcome of patients undergoing robotic IPAA between 2019 and 2022 was conducted. All procedures were performed with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System (with a hand-assisted suprapubic incision to fashion the pouch). All pouch-anal anastomoses were performed using a double purse-string, single-stapled (RiSSA) method. Demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected. Twenty consecutive patients (nine with ulcerative colitis and 11 with familial adenomatous polyposis) were included with a median age of 25 years (range 16-52); 18 had American Society of Anesthesiologists classification II, and mean body mass index was 24 kg/m RiSSA offers a safe and feasible alternative technique to other minimally invasive approaches with low rates of anastomosis-related complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36806873
doi: 10.1111/codi.16528
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1169-1175

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Références

Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2:85-8.
Worley GHT, Fearnhead NS, Brown SR, Acheson AG, Lee MJ, Faiz OD, et al. Review of current practice and outcomes following ileoanal pouch surgery: lessons learned from the Ileoanal Pouch Registry and the 2017 Ileoanal Pouch Report. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:913-22.
Roumen RMH, Rahusen FTG, Wijnen MHWA, Croiset van Uchelen FA. ‘Dog ear’ formation after double-stapled low anterior resection as a risk factor for anastomotic disruption. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:522-5.
Bracey E, Knol J, Buchs N, Jones O, Cunningham C, Guy R, et al. Technique for a stapled anastomosis following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:O208-12.
Spinelli A, Carvello M, D'Hoore A, Foppa C. Integration of transanal techniques for precise rectal transection and single-stapled anastomosis: a proof of concept study. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21:841-6.
Liu S, Eisenstein S. State-of-the-art surgery for ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406:1751-61.
Crippa J, Carvello M, Kotze PG, Spinelli A. Robotic surgery in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Drug Targets. 2021;22:112-6.
Fletcher J, Behrenbruch C, Deputy M, Miskovic D, Faiz O. Robotic proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch with robotic intracorporeal single-stapled anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis-a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2022:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/CODI.16449
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1569-80.
Lightner AL, Grass F, McKenna NP, et al. Short-term postoperative outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are equivalent. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10151-019-01953-8
de Buck van Overstraeten A, Mark-Christensen A, Wasmann KA, Bastiaenen VP, Buskens CJ, Wolthuis AM, et al. Transanal versus transabdominal minimally invasive (completion) proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2017;266:878-83.
Spinelli A, Foppa C, Carvello M, Sacchi M, de Lucia F, Clerico G, et al. Transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS): a comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:3123-9.
Bartels SAL, D'Hoore A, Cuesta MA, Bensdorp AJ, Lucas C, Bemelman WA. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1045-8.
Miller AT, Berian JR, Rubin M, Hurst RD, Fichera A, Umanskiy K. Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:587-94.
Opoku D, Hart A, Thompson DT, Tran CG, Suraju MO, Chang J, et al. Equivalency of short-term perioperative outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Does procedure complexity override operative approach? Surg Open Sci. 2022;9:86-90.
Flynn J, Larach JT, Kong JCH, Warrier SK, Heriot A. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36:1345-56.
Saqib SU, Raza MZ, Evans C, Bajwa AA. The robotic learning curve for a newly appointed colorectal surgeon. J Robot Surg. 2023;17:73-78.
Anderson M, Grucela A. Robotic surgery for ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022;34:292-6.

Auteurs

Mohammed Deputy (M)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Francesca Pitman (F)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Leicester University Medical School, George Davies Centre, Leicester, UK.

Kapil Sahnan (K)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Danilo Miskovic (D)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Omar Faiz (O)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH