Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus.
Consensus
Delphi
Epidermal necrolysis
Quality of life
Sequelae
Stevens-Johnson syndrome
Toxic epidermal necrolysis
Journal
Orphanet journal of rare diseases
ISSN: 1750-1172
Titre abrégé: Orphanet J Rare Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 02 2023
22 02 2023
Historique:
received:
22
08
2022
accepted:
06
02
2023
entrez:
23
2
2023
pubmed:
24
2
2023
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking. We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae. Participants were sent a survey via the online tool "Survey Monkey" consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as 'appropriate'; four statements were considered 'uncertain', and ultimately finally discarded. Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae.
METHODS
Participants were sent a survey via the online tool "Survey Monkey" consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.
RESULTS
Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as 'appropriate'; four statements were considered 'uncertain', and ultimately finally discarded.
CONCLUSIONS
Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36814255
doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7
pii: 10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7
pmc: PMC9945700
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
33Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Oct;35(4):234-6
pubmed: 8957644
J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Aug;115(2):149-53
pubmed: 10951229
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 May;155(5):804-13
pubmed: 23394907
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun - Jul;147(6-7):475-481
pubmed: 32253008
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;181(2):421-422
pubmed: 31016732
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):900-906
pubmed: 31260078
Dermatology. 2014;228(4):338-43
pubmed: 24662107
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;29(3):372-7
pubmed: 23289903
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Jan 1;45(1):15-33
pubmed: 31697370
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;148(6):852-9.e2
pubmed: 19837383
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;158(5):983-93
pubmed: 25036881
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Sep;34(9):1957-1971
pubmed: 32415695
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jan;182(1):247-248
pubmed: 31323695
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Jan;35(1):188-194
pubmed: 32810314
J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Jan;128(1):35-44
pubmed: 17805350
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jan;143(1):66-73
pubmed: 30573342
Allergy. 2007 Dec;62(12):1439-44
pubmed: 17983378
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Mar;182(3):618-624
pubmed: 31396952
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Oct;63:204-210
pubmed: 30103195
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019 Dec;44(8):897-902
pubmed: 30908698
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Feb;172(2):400-5
pubmed: 25496398
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 May;133(5):1197-204
pubmed: 23389396
Dermatology. 2016;232(2):220-3
pubmed: 26866828
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul - Aug;6(4):1287-1296.e1
pubmed: 29100867
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;168(3):555-62
pubmed: 23136927
Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 May;96(4):525-9
pubmed: 26582440
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Sep;185(3):616-626
pubmed: 33657677
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Nov 1;59(14):DES80-DES86
pubmed: 30481810
Oman Med J. 2017 Sep;32(5):436-439
pubmed: 29026478
Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1996-2011
pubmed: 28476287
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Oct;177(4):924-935
pubmed: 28144971
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Summer;4(2):81-5
pubmed: 22102931
Ophthalmology. 1995 Apr;102(4):576-85
pubmed: 7724175
Ocul Surf. 2015 Jul;13(3):213-25
pubmed: 26045239
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jun;174(6):1194-227
pubmed: 27317286
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Burns. 2020 Aug;46(5):1107-1113
pubmed: 31862277
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):916-926
pubmed: 31385287
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jan 1;157(1):117-119
pubmed: 33295942
Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(36):3872-3880
pubmed: 31696801
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Mar;27(3):356-64
pubmed: 22211830
Arch Dermatol. 2009 Nov;145(11):1332-3
pubmed: 19917972
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):490.e1-490.e7
pubmed: 28314701
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Jul;35(7):1569-1576
pubmed: 33834541
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Oct;34(5):745-748
pubmed: 33915265
Allergy. 2020 Apr;75(4):956-959
pubmed: 31557316
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jun;82(6):1553-1567
pubmed: 32151629
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 May;86(5):344-356
pubmed: 35122269
Br J Dermatol. 2019 May;180(5):1206-1213
pubmed: 30282109
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014 Dec 22;11:45-51
pubmed: 25653532
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Apr 10;13(1):56
pubmed: 29636107
Arch Dermatol. 2000 Mar;136(3):323-7
pubmed: 10724193
Arch Dermatol. 2009 Feb;145(2):157-62
pubmed: 19221260
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Aug;175(2):422-4
pubmed: 27292197