Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Human Breast Capsules Formed around Five Different Expander Surfaces.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2023
01 09 2023
Historique:
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
25
2
2023
entrez:
24
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Polyurethane (PU) coating and implant texturization were designed to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture (CC), even if the link between surface type and CC remains unclear. To date, the etiopathogenetic aspects have not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate capsules formed around five different breast expanders. Thirty patients were divided into randomized groups implanted with five different expanders: smooth, coated with PU foam (poly), with a low-microtextured, high-microtextured, and macrotextured surface (L-micro, H-micro, macro). Specimens of the capsules were removed at implant reconstruction and evaluated for morphology and immunohistochemistry expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), collagen type I and III, CD68, CD34, and CD3. Remodeling Combined Index was also evaluated. Expression of α-SMA was significantly increased in smooth capsules versus poly, low-microtextured, and high-microtextured groups ( P = 0.007; P = 0.010; P = 0.028), whereas the prevalence of collagen type I in smooth capsules and collagen type III in poly capsules identified a stable versus an unstable tissue. Remodeling Combined Index and α-SMA showed an inverted correlation. CD68 and CD34 cellular expression increased significantly in poly capsules with respect to smooth ( P < 0.001; P < 0.001) and macrotextured groups ( P < 0.001; P < 0.001). CD3 showed no significant difference among the groups. In this human study, the authors observed that increased tissue remodeling and reduced myofibroblast activation, along with the inflammatory infiltration and neoangiogenesis, especially in the poly and low-microtextured groups, might promote the formation of an unstable and less fibrotic capsule, lowering the risk of CC. Therapeutic, III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Polyurethane (PU) coating and implant texturization were designed to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture (CC), even if the link between surface type and CC remains unclear. To date, the etiopathogenetic aspects have not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate capsules formed around five different breast expanders.
METHODS
Thirty patients were divided into randomized groups implanted with five different expanders: smooth, coated with PU foam (poly), with a low-microtextured, high-microtextured, and macrotextured surface (L-micro, H-micro, macro). Specimens of the capsules were removed at implant reconstruction and evaluated for morphology and immunohistochemistry expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), collagen type I and III, CD68, CD34, and CD3. Remodeling Combined Index was also evaluated.
RESULTS
Expression of α-SMA was significantly increased in smooth capsules versus poly, low-microtextured, and high-microtextured groups ( P = 0.007; P = 0.010; P = 0.028), whereas the prevalence of collagen type I in smooth capsules and collagen type III in poly capsules identified a stable versus an unstable tissue. Remodeling Combined Index and α-SMA showed an inverted correlation. CD68 and CD34 cellular expression increased significantly in poly capsules with respect to smooth ( P < 0.001; P < 0.001) and macrotextured groups ( P < 0.001; P < 0.001). CD3 showed no significant difference among the groups.
CONCLUSION
In this human study, the authors observed that increased tissue remodeling and reduced myofibroblast activation, along with the inflammatory infiltration and neoangiogenesis, especially in the poly and low-microtextured groups, might promote the formation of an unstable and less fibrotic capsule, lowering the risk of CC.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36827480
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010317
pii: 00006534-990000000-01578
doi:
Substances chimiques
Collagen Type I
0
Capsules
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
388e-397eInformations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Johnson M. Breast implants: history, safety, and imaging. Radiol Technol. 2013;84:439M–515M; quiz 516M–520M.
Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S–13S.
Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast 2017;32:7–12.
Marques M, Brown SA, Oliveira I, et al. Long-term follow-up of breast capsule contracture rates in cosmetic and reconstructive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:769–778.
Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:757–767; discussion 768–772.
Loreti A, Siri G, De Carli M, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy with polyurethane implants versus textured implants: a retrospective study with focus on capsular contracture. Breast 2020;54:127–132.
Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1119–1123.
Scuderi N, Mazzocchi M, Rubino C. Effects on zafirlucast on capsular contracture: controlled study measuring the mammary compliance. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007;20:577–584.
Siggelkow W, Faridi A, Spiritus K, Klinge U, Rath W, Klosterhalfen B. Histological analysis of silicone breast implant capsules and correlation with capsular contracture. Biomaterials 2003;24:1101–1109.
Kyle DJ, Oikonomou A, Hill E, Bayat A. Development and functional evaluation of biomimetic silicone surfaces with hierarchical micro/nano-topographical features demonstrates favourable in vitro foreign body response of breast-derived fibroblasts. Biomaterials 2015;52:88–102.
Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR, Pittman TA, Cohen R, Stevens WG. Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38:38–48.
Cifuentes I, Dagnino B, Rada G. Do textured breast implants decrease the rate of capsular contracture compared to smooth implants? Medwave 2017;17:e7020.
Poppler L, Cohen J, Dolen UC, et al. Histologic, molecular, and clinical evaluation of explanted breast prostheses, capsules, and acellular dermal matrices for bacteria. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:653–668.
de Bakker E, van den Broek LJ, Ritt MJPF, Gibbs S, Niessen FB. The histological composition of capsular contracture focussed on the inner layer of the capsule: an intra-donor Baker-I versus Baker-IV comparison. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42:1485–1491.
Lam TC, Hsieh F, Salinas J, Boyages J. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction after mastectomy with or without prior postmastectomy radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5:e1489.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14607:2018. Non-active surgical implants—mammary implants—particular requirements. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/63973.html . Accessed May 10, 2021.
Hamdi M. Association between breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) risk and polyurethane breast implants: clinical evidence and European perspective. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Suppl):S49–S54.
Boháč M, Danišovič L, Danihel L, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of capsular synovial metaplasias that form around silicone breast implants. Biologia 2018;73:107–112.
Rao KB, Malathi N, Narashiman S, Rajan ST. Evaluation of myofibroblasts by expression of alpha smooth muscle actin: a marker in fibrosis, dysplasia and carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZC14–ZC17.
van der Kooij MA, von der Mark EM, Kruijt JK, van Velzen A, van Berkel TJ, Morand OH. Human monocyte-derived macrophages express an approximately 120-kD Ox-LDL binding protein with strong identity to CD68. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3107–3116.
Siemerink MJ, Klaassen I, Vogels IMC, Griffioen AW, Van Noorden CJF, Schlingemann RO. CD34 marks angiogenic tip cells in human vascular endothelial cell cultures. Angiogenesis 2012;15:151–163.
Dong D, Zheng L, Lin J, et al. Structural basis of assembly of the human T cell receptor-CD3 complex. Nature 2019;573:546–552.
Persichetti P, Segreto F, Carotti S, Marangi GF, Tosi D, Morini S. Oestrogen receptor-alpha and -beta expression in breast implant capsules: experimental findings and clinical correlates. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:308–315.
Pool SMW, Wolthuizen R, Moues-Vink CM. Silicone breast prostheses: a cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2018;71:1563–1569.
Stevens WG, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, et al. Five-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra’s U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Silimed brand round and shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:973–981.
Cannon CL, Lindsey JT. Conservative augmentation with periareolar mastopexy reduces complications and treats a variety of breast types: a 5-year retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:516–521.
Kamel M, Protzner K, Fornasier V, Peters W, Smith D, Ibanez D. The peri-implant breast capsule: an immunophenotypic study of capsules taken at explantation surgery. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:88–96.
Moyer HR, Ghazi BH, Losken A. The effect of silicone gel bleed on capsular contracture: a generational study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:793–800.
Netscher DT, Weizer G, Wigoda P, Walker LE, Thornby J, Bowen D. Clinical relevance of positive breast periprosthetic cultures without overt infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1125–1129.
Luttikhuizen DT, Harmsen MC, Van Luyn MJA. Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1955–1970.
Klopfleisch R, Jung F. The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017;105:927–940.
Prantl L, Schreml S, Fichtner-Feigl S, et al. Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:275–284.
Bui JM, Perry T, Ren CD, Nofrey B, Teitelbaum S, Van Epps DE. Histological characterization of human breast implant capsules. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39:306–315.
Brazin J, Malliaris S, Groh B, et al. Mast cells in the periprosthetic breast capsule. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38:592–601.
Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:585–601.
Darby IA, Zakuan N, Billet F, Desmouliere A. The myofibroblast, a key cell in normal and pathological tissue repair. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:1145–1157.
Gerarduzzi C, Di Battista JA. Myofibroblast repair mechanisms post-inflammatory response: a fibrotic perspective. Inflamm Res. 2017;66:451–465.
Kuriyama E, Ochiai H, Inoue Y, et al. Characterization of the capsule surrounding smooth and textured tissue expanders and correlation with contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5:e1403.
von Recum AF, Opitz H, Wu E. Collagen types I and III at the implant/tissue interface. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:757–761.
Pontes GH, Vargas Guerrero LA, Mendes Carneiro Filho FS, et al. Reduced remodeling biomarkers tissue expression in nanotextured compared with polyurethane implants capsules: a study in rats. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41:NP664–NP683.
Pulford KA, Rigney EM, Micklem KJ, et al. KP1: A new monoclonal antibody that detects a monocyte/macrophage associated antigen in routinely processed tissue sections. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:414–421.
Sidney LE, Branch MJ, Dunphy SE, Dua HS, Hopkinson A. Concise review: evidence for CD34 as a common marker for diverse progenitors. Stem Cells 2014;32:1380–1389.
Chien YH, Jores R, Crowley MP. Recognition by gamma/delta T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996;14:511–532.
Vázquez G. A ten-year experience using polyurethane-covered breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23:189–196.