Loneliness in Older Migrants: Exploring the Role of Cultural Differences in Their Loneliness Experience.
ageism
coping
coping strategies
cultural aspects
culture
linear regression
loneliness
older migrants
older people
social capital
social environment
social relationship
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 02 2023
04 02 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
revised:
18
01
2023
accepted:
26
01
2023
entrez:
25
2
2023
pubmed:
26
2
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The scientific literature suggests the necessity of studying loneliness from a broader social perspective. This article aims to broaden the research on loneliness in older migrants by exploring the role of cultural differences through the lens of the social environment (as measured in social capital, discrimination, and ageism) and social situation (as measured in relational mobility, childness, and marital status). Based on Hofstede's Individualism Index, older migrants involved in the BBC Loneliness Experiment (N = 2164) were classified into three groups: cultural migrants (i.e., from a collectivist to individualist culture) (N = 239), migrants with a similar culture (i.e., within an individualist culture) (N = 841), and ageing non-migrants (N = 1084). The two main objectives were (1) to compare the levels of loneliness among these three groups, and (2) to unravel how different influencing factors, such as the social environment, social situation, coping strategies, and personal characteristics, are related to loneliness. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine the differences in the loneliness, social environment, social situation, and personal characteristic variables between the groups, with adjusted p-values according to the Bonferroni correction to limit the potential for type I errors (α = 0.005). Multiple linear regressions were performed to unravel the relationships between loneliness and the different influencing factors, namely the social environment, social situation, coping strategies, and personal characteristics. The bivariate analyses show no significant difference in loneliness across the three groups. The multiple linear regressions demonstrate that the social environment (i.e., social capital, discrimination, and ageism) is significantly associated with loneliness. Social capital acts as a protective factor for cultural migrants (β = -0.27, The results show that the structural factor of the social environment in which older migrants' find themselves, rather than their culture of origin, is more important for older migrants' feelings of loneliness in later life. A favorable social environment with high social capital and low levels of discrimination and ageism protects against loneliness in the ageing population across cultures. Practical implications for loneliness interventions for older migrants are put forward.
Sections du résumé
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The scientific literature suggests the necessity of studying loneliness from a broader social perspective. This article aims to broaden the research on loneliness in older migrants by exploring the role of cultural differences through the lens of the social environment (as measured in social capital, discrimination, and ageism) and social situation (as measured in relational mobility, childness, and marital status). Based on Hofstede's Individualism Index, older migrants involved in the BBC Loneliness Experiment (N = 2164) were classified into three groups: cultural migrants (i.e., from a collectivist to individualist culture) (N = 239), migrants with a similar culture (i.e., within an individualist culture) (N = 841), and ageing non-migrants (N = 1084).
OBJECTIVES
The two main objectives were (1) to compare the levels of loneliness among these three groups, and (2) to unravel how different influencing factors, such as the social environment, social situation, coping strategies, and personal characteristics, are related to loneliness.
METHODS
Bivariate analyses were performed to determine the differences in the loneliness, social environment, social situation, and personal characteristic variables between the groups, with adjusted p-values according to the Bonferroni correction to limit the potential for type I errors (α = 0.005). Multiple linear regressions were performed to unravel the relationships between loneliness and the different influencing factors, namely the social environment, social situation, coping strategies, and personal characteristics.
RESULTS
The bivariate analyses show no significant difference in loneliness across the three groups. The multiple linear regressions demonstrate that the social environment (i.e., social capital, discrimination, and ageism) is significantly associated with loneliness. Social capital acts as a protective factor for cultural migrants (β = -0.27,
DISCUSSION
The results show that the structural factor of the social environment in which older migrants' find themselves, rather than their culture of origin, is more important for older migrants' feelings of loneliness in later life. A favorable social environment with high social capital and low levels of discrimination and ageism protects against loneliness in the ageing population across cultures. Practical implications for loneliness interventions for older migrants are put forward.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36833479
pii: ijerph20042785
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042785
pmc: PMC9957511
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 209625/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Dementia (London). 2019 Oct-Nov;18(7-8):3113-3129
pubmed: 29649908
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Jul 29;18(3):333-344
pubmed: 34483798
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):740-747
pubmed: 30478970
J Aging Health. 2019 Feb;31(2):231-255
pubmed: 28826270
Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):616-27
pubmed: 14570958
J Health Psychol. 1997 Jul;2(3):335-51
pubmed: 22013026
J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20-40
pubmed: 8576833
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2021 Sep;36(3):229-252
pubmed: 34417957
Res Aging. 2021 Feb;43(2):63-73
pubmed: 32662345
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0255088
pubmed: 34310643
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Mar;70(2):279-90
pubmed: 24859225
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jan - Feb;92:104254
pubmed: 32957019
Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 10;57(6):1020-1030
pubmed: 27831482
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):354-62
pubmed: 15382985
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Feb 22;18(3):311-322
pubmed: 34483796
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May;61 Suppl 2:S299-305
pubmed: 23662722
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 May;40(5):421-430
pubmed: 30917066
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(12):2645-54
pubmed: 15081212
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):250-64
pubmed: 25910393
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2015 Sep;30(3):251-68
pubmed: 25982532
Australas J Ageing. 2008 Sep;27(3):110-5
pubmed: 18713169
Eur J Ageing. 2017 Mar 30;14(4):341-351
pubmed: 29180940
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):356
pubmed: 32958076