Mitochondrial phylogenomics provides conclusive evidence that the family Ancyrocephalidae is deeply paraphyletic.
Dactylogyridae
Dactylogyridea
Dactylogyrus simplex
Dactylogyrus tuba
Mitochondrial genome
Paraphyly
Phylogeny
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2023
01 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
21
11
2022
accepted:
02
02
2023
entrez:
1
3
2023
pubmed:
2
3
2023
medline:
4
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Unresolved taxonomic classification and paraphyly pervade the flatworm class Monogenea: the class itself may be paraphyletic and split into Polyopisthocotylea and Monopisthocotylea; there are some indications that the monopisthocotylean order Dactylogyridea may also be paraphyletic; single-gene markers and some morphological traits indicate that the family Ancyrocephalidae is paraphyletic and intertwined with the family Dactylogyridae. To attempt to study the relationships of Ancyrocephalidae and Monopisthocotylea using a phylogenetic marker with high resolution, we sequenced mitochondrial genomes of two fish ectoparasites from the family Dactylogyridae: Dactylogyrus simplex and Dactylogyrus tuba. We conducted phylogenetic analyses using three datasets and three methods. Datasets were ITS1 (nuclear) and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of almost complete mitogenomes of almost all available Monopisthocotylea mitogenomes. Methods were maximum likelihood (IQ-TREE), Bayesian inference (MrBayes) and CAT-GTR (PhyloBayes). Both mitogenomes exhibited the ancestral gene order for Neodermata, and both were compact, with few and small intergenic regions and many and large overlaps. Gene sequences were remarkably divergent for nominally congeneric species, with only trnI exhibiting an identity value > 80%. Both mitogenomes had exceptionally low A + T base content and AT skews. We found evidence of pervasive compositional heterogeneity in the dataset and indications that base composition biases cause phylogenetic artefacts. All six mitogenomic analyses produced unique topologies, but all nine analyses produced topologies that rendered Ancyrocephalidae deeply paraphyletic. Mitogenomic data consistently resolved the order Capsalidea as nested within the Dactylogyridea. The analyses indicate that taxonomic revisions are needed for multiple Polyopisthocotylea lineages, from genera to orders. In combination with previous findings, these results offer conclusive evidence that Ancyrocephalidae is a paraphyletic taxon. The most parsimonious solution to resolve this is to create a catch-all Dactylogyridae sensu lato clade comprising the current Ancyrocephalidae, Ancylodiscoididae, Pseudodactylogyridae and Dactylogyridae families, but the revision needs to be confirmed by another marker with a sufficient resolution.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Unresolved taxonomic classification and paraphyly pervade the flatworm class Monogenea: the class itself may be paraphyletic and split into Polyopisthocotylea and Monopisthocotylea; there are some indications that the monopisthocotylean order Dactylogyridea may also be paraphyletic; single-gene markers and some morphological traits indicate that the family Ancyrocephalidae is paraphyletic and intertwined with the family Dactylogyridae.
METHODS
METHODS
To attempt to study the relationships of Ancyrocephalidae and Monopisthocotylea using a phylogenetic marker with high resolution, we sequenced mitochondrial genomes of two fish ectoparasites from the family Dactylogyridae: Dactylogyrus simplex and Dactylogyrus tuba. We conducted phylogenetic analyses using three datasets and three methods. Datasets were ITS1 (nuclear) and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of almost complete mitogenomes of almost all available Monopisthocotylea mitogenomes. Methods were maximum likelihood (IQ-TREE), Bayesian inference (MrBayes) and CAT-GTR (PhyloBayes).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Both mitogenomes exhibited the ancestral gene order for Neodermata, and both were compact, with few and small intergenic regions and many and large overlaps. Gene sequences were remarkably divergent for nominally congeneric species, with only trnI exhibiting an identity value > 80%. Both mitogenomes had exceptionally low A + T base content and AT skews. We found evidence of pervasive compositional heterogeneity in the dataset and indications that base composition biases cause phylogenetic artefacts. All six mitogenomic analyses produced unique topologies, but all nine analyses produced topologies that rendered Ancyrocephalidae deeply paraphyletic. Mitogenomic data consistently resolved the order Capsalidea as nested within the Dactylogyridea.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The analyses indicate that taxonomic revisions are needed for multiple Polyopisthocotylea lineages, from genera to orders. In combination with previous findings, these results offer conclusive evidence that Ancyrocephalidae is a paraphyletic taxon. The most parsimonious solution to resolve this is to create a catch-all Dactylogyridae sensu lato clade comprising the current Ancyrocephalidae, Ancylodiscoididae, Pseudodactylogyridae and Dactylogyridae families, but the revision needs to be confirmed by another marker with a sufficient resolution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36859280
doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05692-6
pii: 10.1186/s13071-023-05692-6
pmc: PMC9979435
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
83Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31960737
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31860738
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province
ID : 2021D01B56
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Nov;69(2):365-75
pubmed: 23274056
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Jan 15;143:891-901
pubmed: 31726130
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Nov 20;11(1):601
pubmed: 30458858
Evol Bioinform Online. 2014 Mar 31;10:51-67
pubmed: 24701118
Gene. 2002 Jan 9;282(1-2):33-41
pubmed: 11814675
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W232-5
pubmed: 27084950
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):172-5
pubmed: 18033792
Nat Methods. 2017 Jun;14(6):587-589
pubmed: 28481363
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Feb 5;7(2):191887
pubmed: 32257344
Curr Biol. 2015 May 18;25(10):1347-53
pubmed: 25866392
Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):798-804
pubmed: 14574403
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Nov;69(2):352-64
pubmed: 23684911
BMC Genomics. 2017 May 26;18(1):414
pubmed: 28549457
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1:S96-9
pubmed: 12952648
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Nov;69(2):313-9
pubmed: 22982435
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jul 4;19(1):520
pubmed: 29973152
Int J Parasitol. 2010 Sep;40(11):1237-45
pubmed: 20493870
Syst Parasitol. 2001 Nov;50(3):159-97
pubmed: 11590306
Syst Biol. 2004 Jun;53(3):485-95
pubmed: 15503675
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120081
pubmed: 25793530
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Apr 27;15(1):149
pubmed: 35477556
Syst Parasitol. 2003 Jan;54(1):1-11
pubmed: 12567005
Genome Biol Evol. 2010 Jul 12;2:425-40
pubmed: 20624745
Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Jan;20(1):348-355
pubmed: 31599058
Syst Biol. 2005 Dec;54(6):952-61
pubmed: 16385775
Bioinformatics. 2021 Feb 09;:
pubmed: 33560364
RNA Biol. 2015;12(10):1159-68
pubmed: 26361137
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 15;27(8):1767-80
pubmed: 10101183
EMBO J. 1986 Aug;5(8):2003-8
pubmed: 2875870
Int J Parasitol. 1985 Dec;15(6):601-8
pubmed: 4093233
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W293-W296
pubmed: 33885785
Q Rev Biol. 2000 Sep;75(3):277-93
pubmed: 11008700
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Sep;52(3):705-14
pubmed: 19457457
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e22594
pubmed: 21949676
Evolution. 2004 May;58(5):1001-18
pubmed: 15212381
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
pubmed: 22357727
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Jul 1;11(7):1797-1812
pubmed: 31192351
Genes (Basel). 2019 Oct 30;10(11):
pubmed: 31671638
Int J Parasitol. 2002 Mar;32(3):233-44
pubmed: 11835967
Int J Parasitol. 2019 Sep;49(10):819-829
pubmed: 31401064
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Oct 10;10(1):462
pubmed: 29017532
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Feb 08;7 Suppl 1:S4
pubmed: 17288577
Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 May 1;7(3):355-364
pubmed: 18784790
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Mar 18;8:164
pubmed: 25890068
Elife. 2015 Mar 12;4:
pubmed: 25764302
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):133
pubmed: 30176801
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 Nov;164:107288
pubmed: 34365015
J Parasitol. 1989 Apr;75(2):207-11
pubmed: 2926588
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 May;30(5):1188-95
pubmed: 23418397
J Helminthol. 2018 Jul;92(4):455-466
pubmed: 28660842