Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature.
One-stage
PJI
Periprosthetic joint infection
TKA
TKR
Total knee arthroplasty
Total knee replacement
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
25
12
2022
accepted:
18
01
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
4
3
2023
entrez:
3
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection. A systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded. CRD42022362767. Eighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%). Patients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded.
PROSPERO ID
UNASSIGNED
CRD42022362767.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36867259
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7
pii: 10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7
pmc: PMC10504163
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2703-2715Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lamagni T (2014) Epidemiology and burden of prosthetic joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(Suppl 1):i5-10
pubmed: 25135091
doi: 10.1093/jac/dku247
Kim HS, Park JW, Moon SY, Lee YK, Ha YC, Koo KH (2020) Current and future burden of periprosthetic joint infection from national claim database. J Korean Med Sci 35(49):e410
pubmed: 33350183
pmcid: 7752258
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e410
McMaster Arthroplasty Collaborative (MAC) (2022) Incidence and predictors of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty: a 15-year population-based cohort study. J Arthroplasty 37(2):367-372.e1
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.006
Giustra F, Bistolfi A, Bosco F, Fresia N, Sabatini L, Berchialla P et al (2022) Highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: comparable clinical and radiological results at a 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07226-6
doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07226-6
pubmed: 36409325
pmcid: 9958150
Giustra F, Bosco F, Cacciola G, Risitano S, Capella M, Bistolfi A et al (2022) No significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between PCL retained or sacrificed kinematic aligned medial pivot total knee arthroplasty in varus knee. J Clin Med 11(21):6569
pubmed: 36362796
pmcid: 9658241
doi: 10.3390/jcm11216569
Aggarwal VK, Rasouli MR, Parvizi J (2013) Periprosthetic joint infection: Current concept. Indian J Orthop 47(1):10–17
pubmed: 23531512
pmcid: 3601222
doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.106884
Gomez MM, Tan TL, Manrique J, Deirmengian GK, Parvizi J (2015) The fate of spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(18):1495–1502
pubmed: 26378265
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00958
Grosso MJ, Kozaily E, Cacciola G, Parvizi J (2021) Characterizing femoral and acetabular bone loss in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infection. J Arthroplasty 36(1):311–316
pubmed: 32771289
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.024
Lazic I, Scheele C, Pohlig F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Suren C (2021) Treatment options in PJI - is two-stage still gold standard? J Orthop 23:180–184
pubmed: 33551610
pmcid: 7848725
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.021
Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD (1983) Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. JBJS 65(8):1087–1098
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198365080-00008
Craig A, King SW, van Duren BH, Veysi VT, Jain S, Palan J (2022) Articular spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip and the knee. EFORT Open Rev 7(2):137–152
pubmed: 35192512
pmcid: 8897569
doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0037
De Martino I, Mancino F, Cacciola G, Di Matteo V, Maccauro G (2022) Local delivery of antibiotic and antiseptic. In: Longo UG, Budhiparama NC, Lustig S, Becker R, Espregueira-Mendes J (eds) Infection in Knee Replacement. Springer, Cham
Maden C, Jaibaji M, Konan S, Zagra L, Borella M, Harvey A et al (2021) The outcomes of surgical management of failed two-stage revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed 92(3):e2021197
pubmed: 34212915
pmcid: 8343741
Gehrke T, Alijanipour P, Parvizi J (2015) The management of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97(10 Supp A):20–29
pubmed: 26430083
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36475
Bialecki J, Bucsi L, Fernando N, Foguet P, Guo S, Haddad F et al (2019) Hip and knee section, treatment, one stage exchange: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplasty 34(2S):S421–S426
pubmed: 30348563
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.026
Bakhtiari IG, Vles G, Busch SM, Frommelt L, Gehrke T, Salber J et al (2022) Septic failure after one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection of the hip: microbiological implications. J Arthroplasty 37(2):373–378
pubmed: 34740790
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.020
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n160
pubmed: 33781993
pmcid: 8005925
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160
Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC (2011) The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(1):305–310
pubmed: 21701348
pmcid: 3124652
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716
pubmed: 12956787
doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
Le N, Blackman B, Zakharia A, Cohen D, de Sa D (2022) MPFL repair after acute first-time patellar dislocation results in lower redislocation rates and less knee pain compared to rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07222-w
doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07222-w
pubmed: 36372845
Risitano S, Cacciola G, Sabatini L, Capella M, Bosco F, Giustra F et al (2022) Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of radiographic and clinical data. J Orthop 33:37–43
pubmed: 35812351
pmcid: 9263746
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.014
Göksan SB, Freeman MA (1992) One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(1):78–82
pubmed: 1732271
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B1.1732271
Whiteside LA, Peppers M, Nayfeh TA, Roy ME (2011) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in TKA treated with revision and direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):26–33
pubmed: 20390472
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1313-9
Singer J, Merz A, Frommelt L, Fink B (2012) High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(5):1461–1471
pubmed: 22081299
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2174-6
Baker P, Petheram TG, Kurtz S, Konttinen YT, Gregg P, Deehan D (2013) Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(12):2713–2720
pubmed: 22692517
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7
Jenny JY, Barbe B, Gaudias J, Boeri C, Argenson JN (2013) High infection control rate and function after routine one-stage exchange for chronically infected TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):238–243
pubmed: 22798139
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2480-7
Tibrewal S, Malagelada F, Jeyaseelan L, Posch F, Scott G (2014) Single-stage revision for the infected total knee replacement: results from a single centre. Bone Joint J 96(6):759–764
pubmed: 24891575
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.33086
Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S (2015) Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):8–14
pubmed: 24923669
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8
Massin P, Delory T, Lhotellier L, Pasquier G, Roche O, Cazenave A et al (2016) Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3131–3139
pubmed: 26611899
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3884-1
Zahar A, Kendoff DO, Klatte TO, Gehrke TA (2016) Can good infection control be obtained in one-stage exchange of the infected TKA to a rotating hinge design? 10-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(1):81–87
pubmed: 26100256
doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4408-5
Castellani L, Daneman N, Mubareka S, Jenkinson R (2017) Factors associated with choice and success of one- versus two-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip and knee prostheses. HSS J 13(3):224–231
pubmed: 28983214
pmcid: 5617816
doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9550-z
Abdelaziz H, Biewald P, Anastasiadis Z, Haasper C, Gehrke T, Hawi N et al (2020) Midterm results after tantalum cones in 1-stage knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center study. J Arthroplasty 35(4):1084–1089
pubmed: 31813812
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.016
Holland G, Brown G, Goudie S, Brenkel I, Walmsley PJ (2021) Results of using a “2-in-1” single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection with associated bone loss: prospective 2-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 34(5):526–532
pubmed: 31569257
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697963
Klemt C, Tirumala V, Oganesyan R, Xiong L, van den Kieboom J, Kwon YM (2021) Single-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved functional outcomes: a propensity score-matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty 36(1):298–304
pubmed: 32778418
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.012
Ji B, Li G, Zhang X, Wang Y, Mu W, Cao L (2021) Midterm survival of a varus-valgus constrained implant following one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center study. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731739
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731739
pubmed: 34520562
Pellegrini A, Meani E, Macchi V, Legnani C (2021) One-stage revision surgery provides infection eradication and satisfying outcomes for infected knee arthroplasty in selected patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 19(7):945–948
pubmed: 33198531
doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1851597
Razii N, Clutton JM, Kakar R, Morgan-Jones R (2021) Single-stage revision for the infected total knee arthroplasty: the cardiff experience. Bone Jt Open 2(5):305–313
pubmed: 34003026
pmcid: 8168544
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.25.BJO-2020-0185.R1
Rossmann M, Minde T, Citak M, Gehrke T, Sandiford NA, Klatte TO et al (2021) High rate of reinfection with new bacteria following one-stage exchange for enterococcal periprosthetic infection of the knee: a single-center study. J Arthroplasty 36(2):711–716
pubmed: 32863076
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.015
Tuecking LR, Silligmann J, Savov P, Omar M, Windhagen H, Ettinger M (2021) Detailed revision risk analysis after single- vs two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective tertiary center analysis. Antibiotics 10(10):1177
pubmed: 34680758
pmcid: 8533002
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101177
Goud AL, Harlianto NI, Ezzafzafi S, Veltman ES, Bekkers JEJ, van der Wal BCH (2021) Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7
pubmed: 34595545
pmcid: 9925475
Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Lenguerrand E, Blom AW, Beswick AD; INFORM Team (2016) Re-infection outcomes following one- and two-stage surgical revision of infected knee prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151537
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151537
Citak M, Friedenstab J, Abdelaziz H, Suero EM, Zahar A, Salber J et al (2019) Risk factors for failure after 1-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty in the management of periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(12):1061–1069
pubmed: 31220022
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00947
Aalirezaie A, Bauer TW, Fayaz H, Griffin W, Higuera CA, Krenn V et al (2019) Hip and knee section, diagnosis, reimplantation: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplasty 34(2):369–379
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.021
Chen JL, Huang TY, Hsu WB, Lee CW, Chiang YC, Chang PJ et al (2022) Characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus isolates from periprosthetic joint infections. Pathogens 11(7):719
pubmed: 35889965
pmcid: 9316792
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070719
Santoso A, Yoon TR, Park KS, Anwar IB, Utomo P, Soetjahjo B et al (2020) The results of two-stage revision for methicillin-resistant periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip. Malays Orthop J 14(1):18–23
pubmed: 32296477
pmcid: 7156181
doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2003.003
Mittal Y, Fehring TK, Hanssen A, Marculescu C, Odum SM, Osmon D (2007) Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection involving resistant organisms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(6):1227–1231
pubmed: 17545425
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200706000-00010
Salgado CD, Dash S, Cantey JR, Marculescu CE (2007) Higher risk of failure of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:48–53
pubmed: 17534195
doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181123d4e
Cacciola G, De Meo F, Cavaliere P (2018) Mechanical and elution properties of G3 low viscosity bone cement loaded up to three antibiotics. J Orthop 15(4):1004–1007
pubmed: 30237670
pmcid: 6143749
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.035
Jakobs O, Schoof B, Klatte TO, Schmidl S, Fensky F, Guenther D et al (2015) Fungal periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 7(1):5623
pubmed: 25874061
Gross CE, Della Valle CJ, Rex JC, Traven SA, Durante EC (2021) Fungal periprosthetic joint infection: a review of demographics and management. J Arthroplasty 36(5):1758–1764
pubmed: 33267978
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.005
Schoof B, Jakobs O, Schmidl S, Klatte TO, Frommelt L, Gehrke T et al (2015) Fungal periprosthetic joint infection of the hip: a systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 7(1):5748
pubmed: 25874063
Marculescu CE, Cantey JR (2008) Polymicrobial prosthetic joint infections: risk factors and outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1397–1404
pubmed: 18421538
pmcid: 2384015
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0230-7
Valenzuela MM, Averkamp BJ, Odum SM, Rowe TM, Fehring TK (2022) Polymicrobial colonization of prosthetic joint infections treated with open wound management. J Arthroplasty 37(7S):S653–S656
pubmed: 35283231
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.016