Monitoring tafamidis treatment with quantitative SPECT/CT in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.
SPECT/CT
SUV quantification
tafamidis
transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis
treatment monitoring
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 07 2023
24 07 2023
Historique:
received:
17
10
2022
revised:
23
01
2023
accepted:
31
01
2023
medline:
25
7
2023
pubmed:
8
3
2023
entrez:
7
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tafamidis treatment positively affects left ventricular (LV) structure and function and improves outcomes in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). We aimed to investigate the relationship between treatment response and cardiac amyloid burden identified by serial quantitative 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT. We furthermore aimed to identify nuclear imaging biomarkers that could be used to quantify and monitor response to tafamidis therapy. Forty wild-type ATTR-CM patients who underwent 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging at baseline and after treatment with tafamidis 61 mg once daily [median, 9.0 months (interquartile range 7.0-10.0)] were divided into two cohorts based on the median (-32.3%) of the longitudinal percent change in standardized uptake value (SUV) retention index. ATTR-CM patients with a reduction greater than or equal to the median (n = 20) had a significant decrease in SUV retention index (P < 0.001) at follow-up, which translated into significant benefits in serum N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels (P = 0.006), left atrial volume index (P = 0.038), as well as LV [LV global longitudinal strain: P = 0.028, LV ejection fraction (EF): P = 0.027, LV cardiac index (CI): P = 0.034] and right ventricular (RV) [RVEF: P = 0.025, RVCI: P = 0.048] functions compared with patients with a decrease less than the median (n = 20). Treatment with tafamidis in ATTR-CM patients results in a significant reduction in SUV retention index, associated with significant benefits for LV and RV function and cardiac biomarkers. Serial quantitative 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging with SUV may be a valid tool to quantify and monitor response to tafamidis treatment in affected patients. 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging with determination of SUV retention index as part of a routine annual examination can provide evidence of treatment response in ATTR-CM patients receiving disease-modifying therapy. Further long-term studies with 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging may help to evaluate the relationship between tafamidis-induced reduction in SUV retention index and outcome in patients with ATTR-CM and will demonstrate whether highly disease-specific 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging is more sensitive than routine diagnostic monitoring.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36881774
pii: 7070981
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead030
pmc: PMC10364619
doi:
Substances chimiques
tafamidis
8FG9H9D31J
Prealbumin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1019-1030Subventions
Organisme : Pfizer
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: R.R. received speaker fees and congress support from Akcea, Alnylam, and Pfizer, as well as research grants from Pfizer. F.D. received speaker fees and congress support from Bayer, Novartis, Alnylam, Pfizer, and AOP, as well as research grants from the Austrian Society of Cardiology and Pfizer. D.D. received speaker fees and congress support from BMS and Pfizer, as well as research grants from Alnylam and the Austrian Society of Cardiology. D.BE. received speaker fees from Bayer, MSD, and Medis Medical Imaging. D.B. received speaker fees and congress support from Bayer, Novartis, Alnylam, Pfizer, and AOP, as well as research grants from the Austrian Society of Cardiology and Pfizer. All other authors have nothing to declare.
Références
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75
pubmed: 28992817
Circulation. 2016 Jun 14;133(24):2404-12
pubmed: 27143678
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec;11(12):1924-1926
pubmed: 30121265
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May 1;20(5):512-524
pubmed: 30649240
EJNMMI Res. 2018 Feb 12;8(1):14
pubmed: 29435671
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):
pubmed: 33120935
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8
pubmed: 20620859
Amyloid. 2023 Mar;30(1):127-137
pubmed: 36251806
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;9(1):14-23
pubmed: 26684970
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 13;379(11):1007-1016
pubmed: 30145929
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 20;46(6):1076-84
pubmed: 16168294
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2451-2466
pubmed: 26610878
Circulation. 2012 Sep 4;126(10):1286-300
pubmed: 22949539
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7
pubmed: 12091180
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Dec;132(23-24):742-761
pubmed: 33270160
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun;13(6):1353-1363
pubmed: 32498921
JACC Case Rep. 2021 Jan 20;3(1):133-135
pubmed: 34317486
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul 21;23(8):1029-1039
pubmed: 35274130
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Nov;37(11):1212-7
pubmed: 27501436
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17
pubmed: 32089132
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):767-780
pubmed: 34788394
Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2018;2(1):17
pubmed: 30175320
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020 Oct;9(7):849-854
pubmed: 32196976
Eur Heart J. 2000 Aug;21(16):1387-96
pubmed: 10952828