Electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake in Denmark: a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, randomised implementation trial.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2023
Historique:
received: 27 01 2023
revised: 09 02 2023
accepted: 10 02 2023
medline: 4 4 2023
pubmed: 9 3 2023
entrez: 8 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal despite effectiveness in preventing influenza infection and related complications. We investigated whether behavioural nudges, delivered via a governmental electronic letter system, would increase influenza vaccination uptake among older adults in Denmark. We did a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, cluster-randomised implementation trial during the 2022-23 influenza season in Denmark. All Danish citizens aged 65 years or older or turning 65 years by Jan 15, 2023 were included. We excluded individuals living in nursing homes and individuals who had an exemption from the Danish mandatory governmental electronic letter system. Households were randomly assigned (9:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1) to usual care or nine different electronic letters designed on the basis of different behavioural nudging concepts. Data were sourced from nationwide Danish administrative health registries. The primary endpoint was receipt of influenza vaccination on or before Jan 1, 2023. The primary analysis assessed an analytical set of one randomly selected individual per household, and a sensitivity analysis included all randomly assigned individuals and accounted for within-household correlation. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05542004. We identified 1 232 938 individuals aged 65 years or older in Denmark and excluded 56 436 (4·6%) individuals living in nursing homes and 211 632 (17·2%) with an exemption from the electronic letter system. We randomly assigned 964 870 (78·3%) participants across 691 820 households. Compared with usual care, influenza vaccination rates were higher in the group receiving an electronic letter highlighting potential cardiovascular benefits of vaccination (81·00% vs 80·12%; difference 0·89 percentage points [99·55% CI 0·29-1·48]; p<0·0001) and the group receiving repeated letters at randomisation and at day 14 (80·85% vs 80·12%; difference 0·73 percentage points [0·13-1·34]; p=0·0006). These strategies improved vaccination rates across major subgroups including those with and without established cardiovascular disease. The cardiovascular gain-framed letter was particularly effective among participants who had not been vaccinated for influenza in the previous season (p Electronically delivered letters highlighting potential cardiovascular benefits of influenza vaccination or sent again as a reminder significantly increased vaccination uptake across Denmark. Although the magnitude of effectiveness was modest, the low-touch, inexpensive, and highly scalable nature of these electronic letters might be informative for future public health campaigns. Sanofi.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal despite effectiveness in preventing influenza infection and related complications. We investigated whether behavioural nudges, delivered via a governmental electronic letter system, would increase influenza vaccination uptake among older adults in Denmark.
METHODS
We did a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, cluster-randomised implementation trial during the 2022-23 influenza season in Denmark. All Danish citizens aged 65 years or older or turning 65 years by Jan 15, 2023 were included. We excluded individuals living in nursing homes and individuals who had an exemption from the Danish mandatory governmental electronic letter system. Households were randomly assigned (9:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1) to usual care or nine different electronic letters designed on the basis of different behavioural nudging concepts. Data were sourced from nationwide Danish administrative health registries. The primary endpoint was receipt of influenza vaccination on or before Jan 1, 2023. The primary analysis assessed an analytical set of one randomly selected individual per household, and a sensitivity analysis included all randomly assigned individuals and accounted for within-household correlation. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05542004.
FINDINGS
We identified 1 232 938 individuals aged 65 years or older in Denmark and excluded 56 436 (4·6%) individuals living in nursing homes and 211 632 (17·2%) with an exemption from the electronic letter system. We randomly assigned 964 870 (78·3%) participants across 691 820 households. Compared with usual care, influenza vaccination rates were higher in the group receiving an electronic letter highlighting potential cardiovascular benefits of vaccination (81·00% vs 80·12%; difference 0·89 percentage points [99·55% CI 0·29-1·48]; p<0·0001) and the group receiving repeated letters at randomisation and at day 14 (80·85% vs 80·12%; difference 0·73 percentage points [0·13-1·34]; p=0·0006). These strategies improved vaccination rates across major subgroups including those with and without established cardiovascular disease. The cardiovascular gain-framed letter was particularly effective among participants who had not been vaccinated for influenza in the previous season (p
INTERPRETATION
Electronically delivered letters highlighting potential cardiovascular benefits of influenza vaccination or sent again as a reminder significantly increased vaccination uptake across Denmark. Although the magnitude of effectiveness was modest, the low-touch, inexpensive, and highly scalable nature of these electronic letters might be informative for future public health campaigns.
FUNDING
Sanofi.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36889332
pii: S0140-6736(23)00349-5
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00349-5
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Influenza Vaccines 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05542004']

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1103-1114

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests MV has received research grant support or served on advisory boards for American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Baxter Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cytokinetics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Relypsa, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Tricog Health; has speaker engagements with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates on clinical trial committees for studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Galmed, Occlutech, Novartis, and Impulse Dynamics. ASB has received fees from Sanofi. SGL is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). BLC has received consulting fees from Amgen, Cardurion, Corvia, Myokardia, and Novartis. ELD, SIS, and MML are full-time employees of Sanofi and might own shares or have stock options in the company. LK has received speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer. SDS has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH and NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi, Theracos, and US2.AI; and consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Puretech Health. TB-S has served as a steering committee member of the Amgen financed GALACTIC-HF trial and the Boston Scientific financed LUX-Dx TRENDS trial; served on advisory boards for Sanofi, GSK, and Amgen; received speaker honoraria from Bayer, GSK, Novartis, and Sanofi; and received research grants from GE Healthcare and Sanofi. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Niklas Dyrby Johansen (ND)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Muthiah Vaduganathan (M)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Ankeet S Bhatt (AS)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center & Division of Research, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Simin Gharib Lee (SG)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Daniel Modin (D)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Brian L Claggett (BL)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Erica L Dueger (EL)

Sanofi, Lyon, France.

Sandrine I Samson (SI)

Sanofi, Lyon, France.

Matthew M Loiacono (MM)

Sanofi, Swiftwater, PA, USA.

Lars Køber (L)

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Scott D Solomon (SD)

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Pradeesh Sivapalan (P)

Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen (JUS)

Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Cyril Jean-Marie Martel (CJ)

Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Palle Valentiner-Branth (P)

Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Tyra Grove Krause (TG)

Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Tor Biering-Sørensen (T)

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: tor.biering-soerensen@regionh.dk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH