Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Utilization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting β
COPD
clinical outcomes
primary care setting
single-inhaler LAMA/LABA dual therapy
treatment patterns
Journal
International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ISSN: 1178-2005
Titre abrégé: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
09
2022
accepted:
15
02
2023
entrez:
13
3
2023
pubmed:
14
3
2023
medline:
15
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Selection of treatments for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may impact clinical outcomes, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs. We aimed to characterize these outcomes along with treatment patterns, for patients with COPD following initiation of single-inhaler long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β This retrospective cohort study used linked primary care electronic medical record data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Aurum) and secondary care administrative data (Hospital Episode Statistics) in England to assess outcomes for patients with COPD who had a prescription for one of four single-inhaler LAMA/LABA dual therapies between 1st June 2015-31st December 2018 (indexing period). Outcomes were assessed during a 12-month follow-up period from the index date (date of earliest prescription of a single-inhaler LAMA/LABA within the indexing period). Incident users were those without previous LAMA/LABA dual therapy prescriptions prior to index; this manuscript focuses on a subset of incident users: non-triple therapy users (patients without concomitant inhaled corticosteroid use at index). Of 10,991 incident users included, 9888 (90.0%) were non-triple therapy users, indexed on umeclidinium/vilanterol (n=4805), aclidinium/formoterol (n=2109), indacaterol/glycopyrronium (n=1785) and tiotropium/olodaterol (n=1189). At 3 months post-index, 63.3% of non-triple therapy users remained on a single-inhaler LAMA/LABA, and 22.1% had discontinued inhaled therapy. Most patients (86.9%) required general practitioner consultations in the first 3 months post-index. Inpatient stays were the biggest contributor to healthcare costs. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs), adherence, time-to-triple therapy, time-to-first on-treatment moderate-to-severe AECOPD, time-to-index treatment discontinuation, HCRU and healthcare costs were similar across indexed therapies. Patients initiating treatment with single-inhaler LAMA/LABA in primary care in England were unlikely to switch treatments in the first three months following initiation, but some may discontinue respiratory medication. Outcomes were similar across indexed treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36908830
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S389281
pii: 389281
pmc: PMC9997204
doi:
Substances chimiques
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
0
Drug Combinations
0
Bronchodilator Agents
0
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
231-245Informations de copyright
© 2023 Requena et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AC, GR, CC, and ASI are employees of GSK and hold stock and shares at GSK. ASI is also a part-time member of the McMaster university faculty. TT, RWo and RWi are employees of Adelphi Real World, which received funding from GSK to conduct the study, but not for manuscript development. VB was an employee of Adelphi Real World at the time of the study, and is currently an employee of Bayer AG UK, and holds stock and shares in Bayer AG UK. Adelphi Real World is a business that provides consulting and other research services to pharmaceutical, device, government, and non-government organizations. Adelphi Real World employees work with a variety of companies and organizations and are expressly prohibited from receiving any payment or honoraria directly from these organizations for services rendered. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jul 19;52(1):
pubmed: 30002103
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 01;6:31893
pubmed: 27583987
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 10;17:1781-1795
pubmed: 35983168
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36
pubmed: 26050254
Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79
pubmed: 25573406
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 May;1(3):199-209
pubmed: 24429126
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):323-37
pubmed: 15862718
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 26;13:695-702
pubmed: 29520137
Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1400-1410
pubmed: 33011203
Respir Res. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):238
pubmed: 31666084
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;63(11):1069-74
pubmed: 17712552
Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr-Jun;31(2):73-80
pubmed: 31007485
Mol Diagn Ther. 2017 Aug;21(4):345-355
pubmed: 28247183
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul 15;186(2):155-61
pubmed: 22561964
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;45:148-158
pubmed: 28606478
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:65-73
pubmed: 24426781
Thorax. 2009 Nov;64(11):939-43
pubmed: 19703830
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005540
pubmed: 25056980
Respir Med. 2011 Mar;105(3):435-41
pubmed: 20880687
Respir Res. 2015 Aug 02;16:92
pubmed: 26233481
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g
pubmed: 30859197
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Jun 17;5:235-45
pubmed: 23818799
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;71:102076
pubmed: 34530132
Respir Res. 2010 Sep 10;11:122
pubmed: 20831787
Respir Med. 2013 Oct;107(10):1481-90
pubmed: 23643487