Novel Once-Weekly Basal Insulin Fc Achieved Similar Glycemic Control With a Safety Profile Comparable to Insulin Degludec in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.
Humans
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
/ drug therapy
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ adverse effects
Insulin Glargine
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ chemically induced
Glycated Hemoglobin
Glycemic Control
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Blood Glucose
/ metabolism
Insulin
/ adverse effects
Hypoglycemia
/ chemically induced
Journal
Diabetes care
ISSN: 1935-5548
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7805975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2023
01 05 2023
Historique:
received:
09
12
2022
accepted:
21
02
2023
medline:
17
5
2023
pubmed:
16
3
2023
entrez:
15
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Basal Insulin Fc (BIF; insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in 265 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using multiple daily injections. During this randomized, parallel, open-label study, patients with T1D were randomized (1:1) to receive BIF once weekly or degludec once daily over the 26-week treatment period. Both groups were titrated to a fasting glucose level of 80-100 mg/dL. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.4%). Secondary end points included percent time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) fasting glucose (FG) level, and rate of hypoglycemia. After 26 weeks, patients receiving BIF had noninferior HbA1c change from baseline versus those receiving degludec, with a statistically significant treatment difference of 0.17% (90% CI 0.01, 0.32; P = 0.07) favoring the comparator. Percent TIR was similar for patients in the BIF (56.1%) and degludec (58.9%; P = 0.112) groups at week 26. FG values were significantly higher for patients receiving BIF (158.8 mg/dL) versus degludec (143.2 mg/dL; P = 0.003). Rates of CGM-derived hypoglycemia were not statistically significantly different for BIF and degludec over 24 h for level 1 (P = 0.960) or level 2 (P = 0.517) hypoglycemia during the treatment period. Occurrence of serious adverse events was similar between the BIF and degludec groups. Once-weekly BIF demonstrated noninferior glycemic control to once-daily degludec (treatment difference: 0.17% favoring degludec) and no difference in hypoglycemia or other safety findings in patients with T1D.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36920867
pii: 148588
doi: 10.2337/dc22-2395
pmc: PMC10154655
doi:
Substances chimiques
insulin degludec
54Q18076QB
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Insulin Glargine
2ZM8CX04RZ
Glycated Hemoglobin
0
Blood Glucose
0
Insulin
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1052-1059Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 by the American Diabetes Association.