Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 07 12 2022
accepted: 27 02 2023
medline: 9 11 2023
pubmed: 18 3 2023
entrez: 17 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones by comparing hard versus soft stones based on their attenuation on computed tomography (Hounsfield Units-HU). Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of laser employed [Holmium:YAG (HL) or Thulium fiber laser (TFL)]. Residual fragments (RF) were defined as > 2 mm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with RF and RF needing further intervention. 4208 patients from 20 centers were included. In whole series, age, recurrent stones, stone size, lower pole stones (LPS), and multiple stones were predictors of RF at multivariable analysis and LPS and stone size with RF requiring further treatment. HU and TFL were associated with lesser RF and RF requiring an additional treatment. In HU < 1000 stones, recurrent stones, stone size, and LPS were predictors of RF at multivariable analysis, whereas TFL was less likely associated with RF. Recurrent stones, stone size, and multiple stones were predictors of RF requiring further treatment, while LPS and TFL were associated with lesser RF requiring further treatment. In HU ≥ 1000 stones, age, stone size, multiple stones, and LPS were predictors of RF at multivariable analysis, while TFL was less likely associated with RF. Stone size and LPS were predictors of RF requiring further treatment, whereas TFL was associated with RF requiring further treatment. Stone size, LPS, and use of HL are predictors of RF after RIRS for intrarenal stones regardless of stone density. HU should be considered an important parameter in predicting SFR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36929407
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04362-7
pii: 10.1007/s00345-023-04362-7
doi:

Substances chimiques

Thulium 8RKC5ATI4P
Holmium W1XX32SQN1
Lipopolysaccharides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2881-2888

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol 196:1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090 pubmed: 27238616
Skolarikos A, Neisius AA, Petřík A et al (2022) EAU Guidelines 2022 on Urolithiasis. https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis-2022_2022-03-24-142444_crip.pdf . Accessed 1 Dec 2022
Inoue T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Fujisawa M (2021) Retrograde intrarenal surgery: past, present, and future. Investig Clin Urol 62:121–135. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200526
doi: 10.4111/icu.20200526 pubmed: 33660439 pmcid: 7940851
Tonyalı Ş, Yılmaz M, Karaaslan M et al (2018) Prediction of stone-free status after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. Turkish J Urol 44:473–477. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.88615
doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.88615
Kahraman O, Dogan HS, Asci A et al (2021) Factors associated with the stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery in children. Int J Clin Pract 75:e14667. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14667
doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14667 pubmed: 34320260
Basatac C, Özman O, Akgül HM et al (2022) The impact of stone density on operative complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a multicenter study with propensity score matching analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 32:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0936
doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0936 pubmed: 33471596
Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125–1130. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0154
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0154 pubmed: 22519718
Gauhar V, Chew BH, Traxer O et al (2022) Indications, preferences, global practice patterns and outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in adults: results from a multicenter database of 6669 patients of the global FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR). World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04257-z
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04257-z pubmed: 36536170
Huang CC, Chuang CK, Wong YC et al (2009) Useful prediction of ureteral calculi visibility on abdominal radiographs based on calculi characteristics on unenhanced helical CT and CT scout radiographs. Int J Clin Pract 63:292–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01861.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01861.x pubmed: 19196367
Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C et al (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58:170–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01115-3
doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01115-3 pubmed: 11489691
Spettel S, Shah P, Sekhar K et al (2013) Using Hounsfield unit measurement and urine parameters to predict uric acid stones. Urology 82:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.015
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.015 pubmed: 23688376
Erturhan S, Bayrak O, Mete A et al (2013) Can the Hounsfield unit predict the success of medically expulsive therapy? Can Urol Assoc J = J l’Association des Urol du Canada 7:E677–E680. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.352
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.352
el-Assmy A, Abou-el-Ghar ME, el-NahasAR, et al (2011) Multidetector computed tomography: role in determination of urinary stones composition and disintegration with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy–an in vitro study. Urology 77:286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.021
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.021
Kim JW, Chae JY, Kim JW et al (2014) Computed tomography-based novel prediction model for the stone-free rate of ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urolithiasis 42:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0609-0
doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0609-0 pubmed: 24162952
Gücük A, Uyetürk U, Oztürk U et al (2012) Does the Hounsfield unit value determined by computed tomography predict the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 26:792–796. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0518
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0518 pubmed: 22201298
Hameed DA, Elgammal MA, ElGanainy EO et al (2013) Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy. Urolithiasis 41:511–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1
doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1 pubmed: 23907170
Foda K, Abdeldaeim H, Youssif M, Assem A (2013) Calculating the number of shock waves, expulsion time, and optimum stone parameters based on noncontrast computerized tomography characteristics. Urology 82:1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.061
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.061 pubmed: 24044913
Molina WR, Marchini GS, Pompeo A et al (2014) Determinants of holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser time and energy during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Urology 83:738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.017
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.017 pubmed: 24486000
Rana RS, Ather MH (2020) Hounsfield units-a significant predictor of lasering time and energy in the management of upper urinary tract stones using Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum Garnet lasers. Int Urol Nephrol 52:1637–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02442-w
doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02442-w pubmed: 32253619
Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M et al (2021) Clinical comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser and high-power holmium laser for ureteral stone management. J Endourol 35:795–800. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0581
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0581 pubmed: 33238763
Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P et al (2022) Thulium fibre laser versus holmium: YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 82:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027 pubmed: 35300888
Corrales M, Traxer O (2022) Retrograde intrarenal surgery: laser showdown (Ho:YAG vs thulium fiber laser). Curr Opin Urol 32:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000971
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000971 pubmed: 35013078
Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Korolev D et al (2022) Prospective single-center study of SuperPulsed Thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery: initial clinical data. Urol Int 106:404–410. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516933
doi: 10.1159/000516933 pubmed: 34134117
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S et al (2021) Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? World J Urol 39:1693–1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03217-9
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03217-9 pubmed: 32363450
Schembri M, Sahu J, Aboumarzouk O et al (2020) Thulium fiber laser: the new kid on the block. Turkish J Urol 46:S1–S10. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20093
doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20093
Lim SH, Jeong BC, Il SS et al (2010) Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free. Korean J Urol 51:777–782. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.777
doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.777 pubmed: 21165199 pmcid: 2991576
Sari S, Ozok HU, Topaloglu H et al (2017) The association of a number of anatomical factors with the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower calyceal stones. Urol J 14:4008–4014
pubmed: 28670667
Corrales M, Sierra A, Doizi S, Traxer O (2022) Risk of sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Open Sci 44:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.008 pubmed: 36071820 pmcid: 9442387
Li Y (2021) The value of Hounsfield unit in retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone of 2–3 cm: a single-center prospective pilot study. Clin Surg Res Commun 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.31491/csrc.2021.09.077
doi: 10.31491/csrc.2021.09.077

Auteurs

William Ong Lay Keat (WOL)

Department of Urology, Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia.

Bhaskar Kumar Somani (BK)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

Amelia Pietropaolo (A)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

Ben Hall Chew (BH)

Department of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Chu Ann Chai (CA)

Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Takaaki Inoue (T)

Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.

Deepak Ragoori (D)

Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Irram Manzil Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Sarvajit Biligere (S)

Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Andrea Benedetto Galosi (AB)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.

Maria Pia Pavia (MP)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.

Giulio Milanese (G)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy.

Thomas Ahn (T)

Department of Urology, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.

Sumit More (S)

Department of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad, India.

Kemal Sarica (K)

Department of Urology, Biruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.

Olivier Traxer (O)

Department of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.

Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh (JY)

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Vineet Gauhar (V)

Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Daniele Castellani (D)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60127, Ancona, Italy. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH