LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: SINGLE CENTER CASE SERIES.
Case series
Laparoscopy
Learning curve
Radical prostatectomy
Journal
Acta clinica Croatica
ISSN: 1333-9451
Titre abrégé: Acta Clin Croat
Pays: Croatia
ID NLM: 9425483
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
entrez:
20
3
2023
pubmed:
21
3
2023
medline:
22
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is traditionally characterized as a technically difficult procedure with a long learning curve but it is successfully performed worldwide. The aim of this paper was to assess the initial learning curve and clinical outcomes for LRP in our center. We performed a retrospective study including 63 LRP cases, in the course of 22 months, performed by 2 urologists, with no previous LRP experience. All patients were previously assessed by a multidisciplinary team and were selected on the basis of low and intermediate risk disease attributes according to the classification of prostate cancer risk groups of the European Association of Urology. The main outcomes of follow-up are procedure duration, estimated blood loss, complications, positive surgical margins, biochemical relapse and urinary continence. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. The median procedure duration was 196.8 minutes and median blood loss 257.1 mL. Significant decrease in both outcomes was observed when comparing first and last cases in the series. There were 5 (7.9%) Clavien Dindo grade II complications. Undetectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) was observed in 59 (93.6%) patients, and fifty-five patients (87.3%) were continent. Following a methodical learning approach, LRP can be safely mastered with favorable outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36938548
doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.2
pii: acc-61_supp3-15
pmc: PMC10022405
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15-20Références
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Mar-Apr;44(2):273-279
pubmed: 28853815
Eur Urol. 2006 Mar;49(3):491-8; discussion 499-500
pubmed: 16359780
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):22-6
pubmed: 22166088
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Feb;18(1):e2344
pubmed: 34662926
J Endourol. 2001 May;15(4):441-5; discussion 447-8
pubmed: 11394459
BMC Urol. 2014 Feb 07;14:18
pubmed: 24506815
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Jan;88(1-2):100-103
pubmed: 28512777
Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):854-7
pubmed: 9426713
Eur Urol. 2006 Jul;50(1):98-104
pubmed: 16563608
J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2291-6
pubmed: 20952022
Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):319-26
pubmed: 10637462
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15770
pubmed: 31145297
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):702-7
pubmed: 21296482
World J Urol. 2021 Dec;39(12):4305-4310
pubmed: 34313810
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):303-13
pubmed: 23932439
Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Mar;15(2):79-82
pubmed: 15725929
BJU Int. 2007 Jun;99(6):1461-6
pubmed: 17537217
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):956-65
pubmed: 19616252
World J Urol. 2014 Oct;32(5):1225-33
pubmed: 24326782
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):632-640
pubmed: 28412062
Eur Urol. 2002 Oct;42(4):338-43
pubmed: 12361898
J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1261-6
pubmed: 12629339
Asian J Androl. 2012 Mar;14(2):278-84
pubmed: 22179509
Photomed Laser Surg. 2014 Feb;32(2):101-5
pubmed: 24460067
Int J Surg Pathol. 2012 Feb;20(1):15-8
pubmed: 22180527
Minerva Chir. 2019 Feb;74(1):37-53
pubmed: 29658681
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Oct 03;89(3):182-185
pubmed: 28969402
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):750-759
pubmed: 33573861
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):23-6
pubmed: 12050484