Assessment of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for Phentermine-Topiramate to Prevent Exposure During Pregnancy.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 4 2023
pubmed: 21 3 2023
entrez: 20 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved phentermine-topiramate for obesity in 2012 and required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to prevent prenatal exposure. No such requirement was introduced for topiramate. To evaluate the rate of prenatal exposure, contraceptive use, and pregnancy testing among patients with phentermine-topiramate compared with topiramate or other antiobesity medications (AOMs). Retrospective cohort study. Nationwide health insurance claims database. Females aged 12 to 55 years with no infertility diagnosis or sterilization procedure. Patients with other indications for topiramate were excluded to identify a cohort that was likely treated for obesity. Patients initiated use of phentermine-topiramate, topiramate, or an AOM (liraglutide, lorcaserin, or bupropion-naltrexone). Pregnancy at treatment initiation, conception during treatment, contraceptive use, and pregnancy testing outcomes were ascertained. Measurable confounders were adjusted for, and extensive sensitivity analyses were done. A total of 156 280 treatment episodes were observed. Adjusted prevalence of pregnancy at treatment initiation was 0.9 versus 1.6 per 1000 episodes (prevalence ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.95]) for phentermine-topiramate versus topiramate. The incidence rate of conception during treatment was 9.1 versus 15.0 per 1000 person-years (rate ratio, 0.61 [CI, 0.40 to 0.91]) for phentermine-topiramate versus topiramate. Both outcomes were similarly lower for phentermine-topiramate compared with AOM. Prenatal exposure was marginally lower in topiramate users compared with AOM users. Approximately 20% of patients in all cohorts had at least 50% of treatment days covered by contraceptives. Few patients had pregnancy tests before treatment (≤5%), but this was more common among phentermine-topiramate users. Outcome misclassification; unmeasured confounding due to lack of prescriber data to account for possible clustering and spillover effects. Prenatal exposure seemed to be significantly lower among phentermine-topiramate users under the REMS. Pregnancy testing and contraceptive use appeared to be inadequate for all groups, which deserves attention to prevent the remaining potential exposures. None.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved phentermine-topiramate for obesity in 2012 and required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to prevent prenatal exposure. No such requirement was introduced for topiramate.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the rate of prenatal exposure, contraceptive use, and pregnancy testing among patients with phentermine-topiramate compared with topiramate or other antiobesity medications (AOMs).
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING
Nationwide health insurance claims database.
PARTICIPANTS
Females aged 12 to 55 years with no infertility diagnosis or sterilization procedure. Patients with other indications for topiramate were excluded to identify a cohort that was likely treated for obesity.
MEASUREMENTS
Patients initiated use of phentermine-topiramate, topiramate, or an AOM (liraglutide, lorcaserin, or bupropion-naltrexone). Pregnancy at treatment initiation, conception during treatment, contraceptive use, and pregnancy testing outcomes were ascertained. Measurable confounders were adjusted for, and extensive sensitivity analyses were done.
RESULTS
A total of 156 280 treatment episodes were observed. Adjusted prevalence of pregnancy at treatment initiation was 0.9 versus 1.6 per 1000 episodes (prevalence ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.95]) for phentermine-topiramate versus topiramate. The incidence rate of conception during treatment was 9.1 versus 15.0 per 1000 person-years (rate ratio, 0.61 [CI, 0.40 to 0.91]) for phentermine-topiramate versus topiramate. Both outcomes were similarly lower for phentermine-topiramate compared with AOM. Prenatal exposure was marginally lower in topiramate users compared with AOM users. Approximately 20% of patients in all cohorts had at least 50% of treatment days covered by contraceptives. Few patients had pregnancy tests before treatment (≤5%), but this was more common among phentermine-topiramate users.
LIMITATIONS
Outcome misclassification; unmeasured confounding due to lack of prescriber data to account for possible clustering and spillover effects.
CONCLUSION
Prenatal exposure seemed to be significantly lower among phentermine-topiramate users under the REMS. Pregnancy testing and contraceptive use appeared to be inadequate for all groups, which deserves attention to prevent the remaining potential exposures.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
None.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36940443
doi: 10.7326/M22-1743
doi:

Substances chimiques

Topiramate 0H73WJJ391
Phentermine C045TQL4WP
Anti-Obesity Agents 0
Contraceptive Agents 0
Fructose 30237-26-4

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

443-454

Auteurs

Amir Sarayani (A)

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, and Center for Drug Safety and Evaluation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (A.S., J.D.B., A.G.W.).

William Troy Donahoo (WT)

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism and Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (W.T.D.).

Christian Hampp (C)

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York (C.H.).

Joshua D Brown (JD)

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, and Center for Drug Safety and Evaluation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (A.S., J.D.B., A.G.W.).

Almut G Winterstein (AG)

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, and Center for Drug Safety and Evaluation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (A.S., J.D.B., A.G.W.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH