The effect of tablet tilt angles and time on posture, muscle activity, and discomfort at the neck and shoulder in healthy young adults.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
09
2022
accepted:
09
03
2023
entrez:
23
3
2023
pubmed:
24
3
2023
medline:
28
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although young adults regularly perform tablet writing, biomechanics during the tablet writing with different tilt angles has not been studied. The objective of this study was to compare posture, muscle activity, and discomfort at the neck and shoulder between tablet writing with 0° (horizontal) and 30° tablet tilt angles over 40 minutes in healthy young adults. Twenty participants wrote continuously for 40 minutes on a tablet with both tilt angles in a randomized order. Between conditions, there was a 5-minute activity break. Differences in neck and shoulder posture, muscle activity, and discomfort between both tablet tilt angles and changes in the outcomes every 10 minutes over 40 minutes were investigated. With the tilted tablet, there were lower neck flexion (Z = -4.637, P<0.001), lower shoulder extension (Z = -3.734, P<0.001), and lower neck Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (left; Z = -4.699, P<0.001 and right; Z = -3.874, P<0.001) as compared to the no tilt condition. However, the right upper trapezius muscle activity was higher in the tilted condition as compared to the no tilt one. Over 40 minutes, the neck VAS (left; χ2(4) = 30.235, P<0.001 and right; χ2(4) = 32.560, P<0.001) and heart rate variability (χ2(4) = 12.906, P = 0.012) showed notable increases after 20 minutes compared to baseline. In conclusion, adjusting the tablet tilt to 30° and limiting time spent to 20 minutes are recommended for young adults during the tablet writing to prevent neck problems.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Although young adults regularly perform tablet writing, biomechanics during the tablet writing with different tilt angles has not been studied. The objective of this study was to compare posture, muscle activity, and discomfort at the neck and shoulder between tablet writing with 0° (horizontal) and 30° tablet tilt angles over 40 minutes in healthy young adults.
METHODS
Twenty participants wrote continuously for 40 minutes on a tablet with both tilt angles in a randomized order. Between conditions, there was a 5-minute activity break. Differences in neck and shoulder posture, muscle activity, and discomfort between both tablet tilt angles and changes in the outcomes every 10 minutes over 40 minutes were investigated.
RESULTS
With the tilted tablet, there were lower neck flexion (Z = -4.637, P<0.001), lower shoulder extension (Z = -3.734, P<0.001), and lower neck Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (left; Z = -4.699, P<0.001 and right; Z = -3.874, P<0.001) as compared to the no tilt condition. However, the right upper trapezius muscle activity was higher in the tilted condition as compared to the no tilt one. Over 40 minutes, the neck VAS (left; χ2(4) = 30.235, P<0.001 and right; χ2(4) = 32.560, P<0.001) and heart rate variability (χ2(4) = 12.906, P = 0.012) showed notable increases after 20 minutes compared to baseline.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, adjusting the tablet tilt to 30° and limiting time spent to 20 minutes are recommended for young adults during the tablet writing to prevent neck problems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36952497
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283521
pii: PONE-D-22-27029
pmc: PMC10035825
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0283521Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Rungkitlertsakul et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt A):132-142
pubmed: 27890121
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Jun;19(3):428-36
pubmed: 18207419
Work. 2016 Mar 10;53(4):917-25
pubmed: 26967038
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74
pubmed: 11018445
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jan;42(1):75-81
pubmed: 31054596
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Jun;30(6):855-861
pubmed: 29950780
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):15-7
pubmed: 25642027
Surg Technol Int. 2014 Nov;25:277-9
pubmed: 25393825
Work. 2012;41(1):81-91
pubmed: 22246308
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):973-5
pubmed: 25931772
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e18284
pubmed: 32940621
Eur J Pain. 2014 Mar;18(3):301-14
pubmed: 23922336
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0137844
pubmed: 26382606
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 May;29(5):793-798
pubmed: 28603347
Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:47-53
pubmed: 27479091
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;131:367-96
pubmed: 26563798
Appl Ergon. 2016 Sep;56:170-8
pubmed: 27184325
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Apr;84(4):329-36
pubmed: 11374117
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 20;19(8):
pubmed: 31010034
Ergonomics. 2019 Dec;62(12):1524-1533
pubmed: 31451087
J Appl Biomech. 2017 Jul;33(3):227-232
pubmed: 27918696
Ergonomics. 2022 Apr;65(4):587-603
pubmed: 34477048
Ergonomics. 2015;58(6):990-1004
pubmed: 25643042
Work. 2019;64(1):85-91
pubmed: 31450531
Ergonomics. 2002 Jul 15;45(9):619-30
pubmed: 12217083
Ergonomics. 2014;57(4):536-44
pubmed: 24606493
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1984;11(4):251-79
pubmed: 6391814
Work. 2018;61(2):257-266
pubmed: 30373975
Saf Health Work. 2020 Jun;11(2):207-214
pubmed: 32596017
Work. 2015;52(2):269-77
pubmed: 26444934
Hum Factors. 2001 Spring;43(1):39-55
pubmed: 11474763
Ergonomics. 2020 Jan;63(1):101-108
pubmed: 31594480
Work. 2014;47(2):207-11
pubmed: 24004729
Ind Health. 1998 Jul;36(3):282-9
pubmed: 9701908
Work. 2013;45(1):59-71
pubmed: 23531566
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jul;62:83-93
pubmed: 28411742