Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting.
Dementia
Geriatrics
Hospital medicine
Patient-centred care
Qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
08
07
2022
accepted:
10
03
2023
entrez:
23
3
2023
pubmed:
24
3
2023
medline:
28
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with cognitive impairment exhibiting agitation and aggression are challenging to manage in the acute hospital setting. When a patient's behaviours place themselves or others at risk of harm, a Clinical Aggression Response Team (C-ART) is dispatched.The aims of this project were to describe the characteristics of patients receiving a C-ART call and the experiences of C-ART staff members via semistructured interviews. Additionally, to audit local practice against two established standards of practice (Local C-ART Call Guideline and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guideline), to develop interventions to address identified shortfalls in adherence to these standards of practice and finally to re-evaluate adherence postintervention. A retrospective pre and postintervention audit using qualitative (interview) and quantitative (file review) mixed method research approach was used. Interventions targeted doctor hospital orientation sessions, distribution of hospital guidelines including a new pharmacological sedation guideline and finally ward-based brief education sessions. Themes identified postintervention included improved familiarity with C-ART terminology, better understanding of C-ART member roles and improved communication among medical teams. However, there was continued pressure to use pharmacological sedation, a lack of debriefing and poor patient handover.File review of patients postintervention showed improvement from 36.8% to 65.6% in recording a provisional diagnosis and differentials for a patient behaviour necessitating a C-ART call. Additionally, the use of psychotropics during C-ART calls was lowered by 3.3% but did not reach significance (p=0.62). Behavioural disturbances in the elderly present many challenges for health staff. Interactive orientation sessions for doctors and distribution of hospital guidelines were shown to improve compliance with Local C-ART Call and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guidelines. Patients who receive multiple C-ART calls require further exploration and consideration, as this subset of the patient population present unique challenges.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with cognitive impairment exhibiting agitation and aggression are challenging to manage in the acute hospital setting. When a patient's behaviours place themselves or others at risk of harm, a Clinical Aggression Response Team (C-ART) is dispatched.The aims of this project were to describe the characteristics of patients receiving a C-ART call and the experiences of C-ART staff members via semistructured interviews. Additionally, to audit local practice against two established standards of practice (Local C-ART Call Guideline and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guideline), to develop interventions to address identified shortfalls in adherence to these standards of practice and finally to re-evaluate adherence postintervention.
METHODS
A retrospective pre and postintervention audit using qualitative (interview) and quantitative (file review) mixed method research approach was used. Interventions targeted doctor hospital orientation sessions, distribution of hospital guidelines including a new pharmacological sedation guideline and finally ward-based brief education sessions.
RESULTS
Themes identified postintervention included improved familiarity with C-ART terminology, better understanding of C-ART member roles and improved communication among medical teams. However, there was continued pressure to use pharmacological sedation, a lack of debriefing and poor patient handover.File review of patients postintervention showed improvement from 36.8% to 65.6% in recording a provisional diagnosis and differentials for a patient behaviour necessitating a C-ART call. Additionally, the use of psychotropics during C-ART calls was lowered by 3.3% but did not reach significance (p=0.62).
CONCLUSION
Behavioural disturbances in the elderly present many challenges for health staff. Interactive orientation sessions for doctors and distribution of hospital guidelines were shown to improve compliance with Local C-ART Call and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guidelines. Patients who receive multiple C-ART calls require further exploration and consideration, as this subset of the patient population present unique challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36958790
pii: bmjoq-2022-002034
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002034
pmc: PMC10040040
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S88-S102
pubmed: 29361069
J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;54(4):522-532
pubmed: 29433934
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 08;12:72
pubmed: 22682666
J Healthc Manag. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(6):377-90; discussion 391-2
pubmed: 15603114
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Jun;27(3):175-82
pubmed: 25911651
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;4(1):9-15
pubmed: 12807591
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2017 Jun;47(2):94-101
pubmed: 28675195
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):119
pubmed: 31023243
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Aug;14(8):823-832
pubmed: 26139023
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Apr;23(7-8):1144-52
pubmed: 24341873
Emerg Med Australas. 2009 Jun;21(3):196-202
pubmed: 19527279
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e022202
pubmed: 30139905
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):392-401.e1
pubmed: 20868907
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;31(6):970-3
pubmed: 23685060
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005 Jul;13(3):180-5
pubmed: 15927470
Br J Nurs. 2014 Jun 26-Jul 9;23(12):653-4, 656-9
pubmed: 25039630
Med J Aust. 1994 Aug 15;161(4):254-8
pubmed: 8047032
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Oct 31;11:1559-1565
pubmed: 27826189