Postoperative full leg radiographs exhibit less residual coronal varus deformity compared to intraoperative measurements in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty with the MAKO™ system.
Alignment
CAS
Computer-aided surgery
FLR
Full limb radiograph
MAKO
Robotic-assisted TKA
TKA
Total knee arthroplasty
raTKA
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
14
09
2022
accepted:
09
03
2023
medline:
18
8
2023
pubmed:
26
3
2023
entrez:
25
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA), currently a major trend in knee arthroplasty, aims to improve the accuracy of implant positioning and limb alignment. However, it is unclear whether and to what extent manual radiographic and navigation measurements with the MAKO™ system correlate. Nonetheless, a high agreement would be crucial to reliably achieve the desired limb alignment. Thirty-six consecutive patients with osteoarthritis and a slight-to-moderate varus deformity undergoing raTKA were prospectively included in this study. Prior to surgery and at follow-up, a full leg radiograph (FLR) under weight-bearing conditions was performed. In addition, a computed tomography (CT) scan was conducted for preoperative planning. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured in the preoperative and follow-up FLR as well as in the CT scout (without weight-bearing) by three independent raters. Furthermore, the HKA was intraoperatively assessed with the MAKO™ system before and after raTKA. Significantly higher HKA values were identified for intraoperative deformity assessment using the MAKO system compared to the preoperative FLR and CT scouts (p = 0.006; p = 0.05). Intraoperative assessment of the HKA with final implants showed a mean residual varus deformity of 3.2° ± 1.9°, whereas a significantly lower residual varus deformity of 1.4° ± 1.9° was identified in the postoperative FLR (p < 0.001). The mMPTA was significantly higher in the preoperative FLR than in the CT scouts (p < 0.001). Intraoperatively, the mMPTA was adjusted to a mean of 87.5° ± 0.9° with final implants, while significantly higher values were measured in postoperative FLRs (p < 0.001). Concerning the mLDFA, no significant differences could be identified. The clinical importance of this study lies in the finding that there is a difference between residual varus deformity measured intraoperatively with the MAKO™ system and those measured in postoperative FLRs. This has implications for preoperative planning as well as intraoperative fine-tuning of the implant position during raTKA to avoid overcorrection of knees with slight-to-moderate varus osteoarthritis. Level IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36964782
doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07386-z
pii: 10.1007/s00167-023-07386-z
pmc: PMC10435414
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3912-3918Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):85-92
pubmed: 27535554
Invest Radiol. 1991 Jan;26(1):71-7
pubmed: 2022456
J Orthop. 2022 Jul 02;33:37-43
pubmed: 35812351
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):102-6
pubmed: 8895625
JBJS Rev. 2021 Oct 25;9(10):
pubmed: 34695035
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):979-985
pubmed: 36434261
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4425-4436
pubmed: 36494462
J Knee Surg. 2021 Aug;34(10):1133-1137
pubmed: 32131103
Orthopedics. 1990 Aug;13(8):861-8
pubmed: 2395764
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):760-767
pubmed: 35864240
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1470-1476
pubmed: 29992465
J Orthop Res. 2004 Nov;22(6):1248-53
pubmed: 15475205
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2736-44
pubmed: 18752032
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1234-40
pubmed: 22933496
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):621-626
pubmed: 33165631
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Sep;108(5):103112
pubmed: 34648999
Knee. 2009 Jan;16(1):42-5
pubmed: 18790641
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jun;69(5):745-9
pubmed: 3597474
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jun;34(7):745-748
pubmed: 31694057
Front Surg. 2021 Jul 20;8:697020
pubmed: 34355018
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):705-712
pubmed: 33452903
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Jun;19(3):e2505
pubmed: 36727280
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):65-70
pubmed: 16998083
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Oct 28;9(1):108
pubmed: 36302997
Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1084-7
pubmed: 25155841
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3322-3329
pubmed: 36324288
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar;22(3):674-9
pubmed: 24051507
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3393-3409.e2
pubmed: 32234326
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2639-2653
pubmed: 33666686
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2677-2695
pubmed: 33547914
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3569-3575
pubmed: 28721459
Int Orthop. 2023 May;47(5):1221-1232
pubmed: 36740610