The Effects of High-Altitude Mountaineering on Cognitive Function in Mountaineers: A Meta-Analysis.
cognitive function
high-altitude
meta-analysis
mountaineer
mountaineering
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 03 2023
14 03 2023
Historique:
received:
18
02
2023
revised:
04
03
2023
accepted:
09
03
2023
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nowadays, with the convenience of international traveling and driven by many individuals' fond dreams of challenging high-altitude exercises, high-altitude mountaineering is becoming increasingly popular worldwide. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the effects of high-altitude mountaineering on cognitive functions in mountaineers before and after climbing. After a thorough electronic literature search and selection, eight studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the conducted test cycles ranged from 8 to 140 days. Eight variables were included in this meta-analysis: the Trail-Making Test (TMB), Digit Span-Forward (DSF), Digit Span-Backward (DSB), Finger Tapping Test-Right (FTR) Finger Tapping Test-Left (FTL), Wechsler Memory Scale Visual (WMSV), the Aphasia Screening Test (Verbal Items) (AST-Ver), and the Aphasia Screening Test (Visual Motor Errors) (AST-Vis). The effect sizes (ES) and forest plots of these eight variables were generated. Five variables (TMB, ES = 0.39; DSF, ES = 0.57; FTR, ES = 0.50; FTL, ES = 0.16; WMSV, ES = 0.63) out of eight were significantly improved after high-altitude mountaineering, whereas the ES values of DSB, AST-Ver, and AST-Vis did not show significant improvement after climbing. Despite two limitations, namely, methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and the inability to explain high heterogeneity between studies, this study is the first meta-analysis that has attempted to specify and compare the cognitive functions of mountaineers before and after high-altitude mountaineering. Furthermore, as a short-term plateau exercise, high-altitude mountaineering has no significant negative impacts on the cognitive functions of climbers. Future research is needed for a long period of high-altitude mountaineering.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Nowadays, with the convenience of international traveling and driven by many individuals' fond dreams of challenging high-altitude exercises, high-altitude mountaineering is becoming increasingly popular worldwide. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the effects of high-altitude mountaineering on cognitive functions in mountaineers before and after climbing.
METHODS
After a thorough electronic literature search and selection, eight studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the conducted test cycles ranged from 8 to 140 days. Eight variables were included in this meta-analysis: the Trail-Making Test (TMB), Digit Span-Forward (DSF), Digit Span-Backward (DSB), Finger Tapping Test-Right (FTR) Finger Tapping Test-Left (FTL), Wechsler Memory Scale Visual (WMSV), the Aphasia Screening Test (Verbal Items) (AST-Ver), and the Aphasia Screening Test (Visual Motor Errors) (AST-Vis). The effect sizes (ES) and forest plots of these eight variables were generated.
RESULTS
Five variables (TMB, ES = 0.39; DSF, ES = 0.57; FTR, ES = 0.50; FTL, ES = 0.16; WMSV, ES = 0.63) out of eight were significantly improved after high-altitude mountaineering, whereas the ES values of DSB, AST-Ver, and AST-Vis did not show significant improvement after climbing.
CONCLUSION
Despite two limitations, namely, methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and the inability to explain high heterogeneity between studies, this study is the first meta-analysis that has attempted to specify and compare the cognitive functions of mountaineers before and after high-altitude mountaineering. Furthermore, as a short-term plateau exercise, high-altitude mountaineering has no significant negative impacts on the cognitive functions of climbers. Future research is needed for a long period of high-altitude mountaineering.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36982007
pii: ijerph20065101
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065101
pmc: PMC10049572
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):903-9
pubmed: 21494919
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing). 1999 Aug;12(4):270-3
pubmed: 11542709
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Oct;67(2):443-52
pubmed: 3217191
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1983 Mar;54(3):202-7
pubmed: 6847554
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Jan;14(1):6-12
pubmed: 20808661
Wilderness Environ Med. 2009 Fall;20(3):261-8
pubmed: 19737042
N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 21;321(25):1714-9
pubmed: 2512483
Cortex. 1998 Apr;34(2):243-51
pubmed: 9606589
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016 Dec;38(6):598-611
pubmed: 28033024
High Alt Med Biol. 2016 Dec;17(4):359-364
pubmed: 27548274
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):114-26
pubmed: 20046194
Hippocampus. 2008;18(7):719-28
pubmed: 18446831
J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962 Sep;65:145-53
pubmed: 13880271
High Alt Med Biol. 2010 Summer;11(2):103-10
pubmed: 20586594
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2013 Jan-Feb;35:28-33
pubmed: 23280141
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Feb;60(2):170-3
pubmed: 2930429
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Dec 15;119(12):1466-80
pubmed: 26229000
Psychophysiology. 2012 Sep;49(9):1298-306
pubmed: 22803634
Cortex. 2003 Feb;39(1):97-103
pubmed: 12627756
High Alt Med Biol. 2010 Summer;11(2):133-7
pubmed: 20586597
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2000 Jul;71(7):678-84
pubmed: 10902930
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995 Sep;66(9):857-64
pubmed: 7487824
Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Dec;25(6):657-74; discussion 674-725
pubmed: 14598623
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Jan;6(1):86-99
pubmed: 10761372
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 Nov;68(11):993-7
pubmed: 9383498