High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging compared with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with regard to image quality and assessment of breast cancer morphology
Breast cancer
conventional
high resolution diffusion weighted
magnetic resonance imaging
tumor morphology
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 03 2023
29 03 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the image quality and tumor morphology depiction ability of high resolution (HR) diffusion- weighted imaging (f-DWI) in comparison to conventional DWI (c-DWI) and dynamic contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the primary breast cancer setting. The f-DWI, c-DWI, and DCE-MRIs of 160 malignant breast masses were evaluated retrospectively by two independent radiologists. Data on image quality [sharpness, distortion, and perceived signalto- noise ratio (SNR)], apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, lesion size, and tumor morphology (shape, margin, and internal pattern) obtained on f-DWI, c-DWI, and DCE-MRI were compared. Consistency between the readers and imaging methods for morphological parameters was analyzed. The ADC values measured on f-DWI were significantly lower than those measured on c-DWI for both readers ( The results demonstrated that f-DWI produces higher-quality images than c-DWI, enabling the morphological features to be identified in similar detail to that offered by HR DCE-MRI. Accordingly, f-DWI, as a method that highly correlates with DCE in determining the morphological characteristics of breast cancers, seems to have potential in the evaluation of breast tumors in patients for whom the use of contrast media is contraindicated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36987843
doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.21362
pmc: PMC10679702
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
251-259Références
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr;29(4):987-93
pubmed: 19306448
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 May;49(5):1381-1390
pubmed: 30325549
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Aug;60(2):468-73
pubmed: 18666126
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Dec;48(6):1668-1677
pubmed: 29734493
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):104-12
pubmed: 17152054
Radiographics. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):1059-84
pubmed: 21768239
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021 Jun 1;20(2):204-215
pubmed: 32611938
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):64-73
pubmed: 20574085
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Mar;41(3):616-23
pubmed: 24585455
Neuroimage. 2002 May;16(1):93-102
pubmed: 11969321
Radiographics. 1998 Jul-Aug;18(4):903-12
pubmed: 9672975
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):789-800
pubmed: 16118161
Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):304-312
pubmed: 32840468
Acad Radiol. 2013 May;20(5):581-9
pubmed: 23570936
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Mar;57(3):625-30
pubmed: 17326167
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jun;184(6):1774-81
pubmed: 15908529
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):813-20
pubmed: 21454408
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1656-65
pubmed: 25914178
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Jul 10;16(3):245-252
pubmed: 27853053
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5761-4
pubmed: 19164026
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):674-81
pubmed: 24214467
Acad Radiol. 2012 May;19(5):526-34
pubmed: 22197382
Korean J Radiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;8(5):390-6
pubmed: 17923781
Br J Radiol. 1998 May;71(845):501-9
pubmed: 9691895
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Aug;14(4):265-71
pubmed: 24462803
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;28(5):1157-65
pubmed: 18972357
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep;71:161-169
pubmed: 32320723