Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
05
12
2022
revised:
05
02
2023
accepted:
06
02
2023
medline:
31
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The interim analysis of the ENZAMET trial of testosterone suppression plus either enzalutamide or standard nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy showed an early overall survival benefit with enzalutamide. Here, we report the planned primary overall survival analysis, with the aim of defining the benefit of enzalutamide treatment in different prognostic subgroups (synchronous and metachronous high-volume or low-volume disease) and in those who received concurrent docetaxel. ENZAMET is an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 83 sites (including clinics, hospitals, and university centres) in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. Eligible participants were males aged 18 years or older with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate adenocarcinoma evident on CT or bone scanning with Between March 31, 2014, and March 24, 2017, 1125 participants were randomly assigned to receive non-steroidal antiandrogen (n=562; control group) or enzalutamide (n=563). The median age was 69 years (IQR 63-74). This analysis was triggered on Jan 19, 2022, and an updated survival status identified a total of 476 (42%) deaths. After a median follow-up of 68 months (IQR 67-69), the median overall survival was not reached (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·58-0·84]; p<0·0001), with 5-year overall survival of 57% (0·53-0·61) in the control group and 67% (0·63-0·70) in the enzalutamide group. Overall survival benefits with enzalutamide were consistent across predefined prognostic subgroups and planned use of concurrent docetaxel. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia associated with docetaxel use (33 [6%] of 558 in the control group vs 37 [6%] of 563 in the enzalutamide group), fatigue (four [1%] vs 33 [6%]), and hypertension (31 [6%] vs 59 [10%]). The incidence of grade 1-3 memory impairment was 25 (4%) versus 75 (13%). No deaths were attributed to study treatment. The addition of enzalutamide to standard of care showed sustained improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and should be considered as a treatment option for eligible patients. Astellas Pharma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The interim analysis of the ENZAMET trial of testosterone suppression plus either enzalutamide or standard nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy showed an early overall survival benefit with enzalutamide. Here, we report the planned primary overall survival analysis, with the aim of defining the benefit of enzalutamide treatment in different prognostic subgroups (synchronous and metachronous high-volume or low-volume disease) and in those who received concurrent docetaxel.
METHODS
ENZAMET is an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 83 sites (including clinics, hospitals, and university centres) in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. Eligible participants were males aged 18 years or older with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate adenocarcinoma evident on CT or bone scanning with
FINDINGS
Between March 31, 2014, and March 24, 2017, 1125 participants were randomly assigned to receive non-steroidal antiandrogen (n=562; control group) or enzalutamide (n=563). The median age was 69 years (IQR 63-74). This analysis was triggered on Jan 19, 2022, and an updated survival status identified a total of 476 (42%) deaths. After a median follow-up of 68 months (IQR 67-69), the median overall survival was not reached (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·58-0·84]; p<0·0001), with 5-year overall survival of 57% (0·53-0·61) in the control group and 67% (0·63-0·70) in the enzalutamide group. Overall survival benefits with enzalutamide were consistent across predefined prognostic subgroups and planned use of concurrent docetaxel. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia associated with docetaxel use (33 [6%] of 558 in the control group vs 37 [6%] of 563 in the enzalutamide group), fatigue (four [1%] vs 33 [6%]), and hypertension (31 [6%] vs 59 [10%]). The incidence of grade 1-3 memory impairment was 25 (4%) versus 75 (13%). No deaths were attributed to study treatment.
INTERPRETATION
The addition of enzalutamide to standard of care showed sustained improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and should be considered as a treatment option for eligible patients.
FUNDING
Astellas Pharma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36990608
pii: S1470-2045(23)00063-3
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00063-3
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
Testosterone
3XMK78S47O
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02446405']
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12614000110684']
EudraCT
['2014-003190-42']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
323-334Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA238020
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Ehtesham Abdi
(E)
Suzanne Allan
(S)
Patricia Bastick
(P)
Stephen Begbie
(S)
Robert Blum
(R)
Karen Briscoe
(K)
Daniel Brungs
(D)
Sean Bydder
(S)
Bala Renuka Chittajallu
(BR)
Michelle Cronk
(M)
Katharine Cuff
(K)
Ian D Davis
(ID)
Anthony Dowling
(A)
Mark Frydenberg
(M)
Matthew George
(M)
Lisa Horvath
(L)
Elizabeth Hovey
(E)
Anthony Joshua
(A)
Narayan Karanth
(N)
Ganessan Kichenadasse
(G)
Laurence Krieger
(L)
Gavin Marx
(G)
Maitham Mathlum
(M)
Louise Nott
(L)
Zulfiquer Otty
(Z)
Francis Parnis
(F)
David Pook
(D)
Shahneen Sandhu
(S)
Sanjeev Sewak
(S)
Amanda Stevanovic
(A)
Martin Stockler
(M)
Aneta Suder
(A)
Hsiang Tan
(H)
Javier Torres
(J)
Simon Troon
(S)
Craig Underhill
(C)
Andrew Weickhardt
(A)
Robert Zielinski
(R)
Tahir Abbas
(T)
Ghadeer Anan
(G)
Chris Booth
(C)
Holly Campbell
(H)
Kim Chi
(K)
Joseph Chin
(J)
Edmond Chouinard
(E)
Bryan Donnelly
(B)
Darrel Drachenberg
(D)
Amir Faghih
(A)
Antonio Finelli
(A)
Sebastien Hotte
(S)
Krista Noonan
(K)
Scott North
(S)
Mohammad Rassouli
(M)
Neil Reaume
(N)
Ricardo Rendon
(R)
Fred Saad
(F)
Evgeny Sadikov
(E)
Eric Vigneault
(E)
Pawel Zalewski
(P)
John McCaffrey
(J)
Ray McDermott
(R)
Patrick Morris
(P)
Miriam O'Connor
(M)
Paul Donnellan
(P)
Dearbhaile O'Donnell
(D)
Jim Edwards
(J)
Peter Fong
(P)
Alvin Tan
(A)
Simon Chowdhury
(S)
Simon Crabb
(S)
Omar Khan
(O)
Vincent Khoo
(V)
Graham Macdonald
(G)
Heather Payne
(H)
Angus Robinson
(A)
Jonathon Shamash
(J)
John Staffurth
(J)
Carys Thomas
(C)
Alastair Thomson
(A)
Christopher J Sweeney
(CJ)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests CJS received institutional research grants from Bayer, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma (Pfizer), Dendreon, and Janssen and personal consulting fees from Bayer, Astellas Pharma, Janssen, CellCentric, Point Biopharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech (Roche), Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Hengrui Europe Biosciences, and AstraZeneca. MRS received institutional research grants from Astellas Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bionomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Medivation, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Tilray. KNC received institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, Point Biopharma, Roche, and Janssen; personal consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, Point Biopharma, and Roche; institutional consulting fees from Janssen; and honoraria from Janssen and AstraZeneca. SC had stock or ownership interests in Clovis Oncology; received honoraria from Novartis and Clovis Oncology; had a consulting or advisory role for Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, BeiGene, and Novartis; and received payment for speakers’ bureaus from Janssen-Cilag and Sanofi (Aventis). MF had a leadership or fiduciary role as a board director for the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. LGH received institutional research grants, honoraria, and Support for meetings or travel from Astellas Pharma. NJL was on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Thoracic Oncology Group of Australia; had a leadership or fiduciary role as a deputy director for Cancer Trials New Zealand; and was a member of the executive committee for New Zealand Society for Oncology. JM had a leadership or fiduciary role as a treasurer for the Irish Society of Medical Oncology; and was a chairman for National Annual Conferences. RM had stock or ownership interests in Bayer; received honoraria from Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, and Clovis Oncology; had a consulting or advisory role for MSD Oncology; received research funding from Janssen, Bayer, and Astellas Pharma; provided expert testimony for Pfizer; and received support for meetings or travel from Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Ipsen. SAN received honoraria from Janssen, Bayer, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Advanced Accelerator Application. FP received honoraria from Bayer and AstraZeneca. DWP received institutional research funding from Medivation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Exelixis, MSD, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Symvivo, and Amgen; personal consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Cipla, Astellas Pharma, and MSD (Pfizer); institutional consulting fees from Pfizer and MSD; honoraria from Bayer and MSD (Pfizer); and support for meetings or travel from Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Amgen, MSD (Pfizer), and Janssen. MNR was on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Pfizer, Ipsen, EMD, Serono, MSD, and Bayer. SKS received research grants from Novartis/AAA, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and MSD; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myer Squibb, MSD, and Janssen; and was on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board as the chair for the data safety monitoring committee at Novartis. AlvT had a leadership or fiduciary role as the head of department for the Te Whatu Ora hospital. THT received honoraria from AstraZeneca. AlvT received honoraria from Novartis and Gilead; support for meetings or travel from MSD, Lilly, Astellas Pharma, and Ipsen; and was on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Novartis, and MSD. FV-B received institutional research grants from Janssen, MSD, and Seagen and consulting fees from Janssen, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Bayer. AYZ received institutional research grants from Astellas Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bionomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Medivation, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Tilray; personal consulting fees from MSD; honoraria from MSD, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Pfizer, Mundipharma, Janssen, and AstraZeneca; and was on the data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD, Astellas Pharma, and Bayer. RRZ received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Pfizer. IDD is the director and chair of the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP); and a member or chair of advisory boards for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD (Pfizer), MSD, Pio Therapeutics, Roche, and Xennials Therapeutics (all honoraria are paid directly to ANZUP). All other authors declare no competing interests.