Clinicopathological, cytogenetic, and molecular profiles of primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.
Clinicopathological findings
Cytogenetic findings
Molecular findings
PCDLBCL
Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphomas
Journal
Human pathology
ISSN: 1532-8392
Titre abrégé: Hum Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9421547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
24
11
2022
revised:
09
03
2023
accepted:
24
03
2023
medline:
29
5
2023
pubmed:
31
3
2023
entrez:
30
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We analyzed the clinicopathological, cytogenetic, and molecular features of 18 primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (PCDLBCLs) and 15 DLBCLs secondarily localized to the skin (SCDLBCLs), highlighting biological similarities and differences between the 2 groups. PCDLBCLs were subclassified after histopathological review as PCDLBCL-leg type (PCDLBCL-LT, 10 cases) and the PCDLBCL-not otherwise specified (PCDLBCL-NOS, 8 cases). Immunohistochemistry for Hans' algorithm markers, BCL2, and MYC was performed. The molecular study included the determination of the cell of origin (COO) by Lymph2Cx assay on NanoString platform, FISH analysis of IgH, BCL2, BCL6, and MYC genes, as well as the mutation analysis of MYD88 gene. In immunohistochemistry analysis, BCL2 and MYC hyperexpression was more frequent in LT than in NOS cases and, according to Hans' algorithm, PCDLBCL-LTs were mostly of the non-GC type (8/10), whereas in PCDLBCL-NOS, the GC type prevailed (6/8). The determination of COO using Lymph2Cx supported and further confirmed these results. In FISH analysis, all but one LT cases versus 5 of 8 PCDLBCL-NOS showed at least one gene rearrangement among IgH, BCL2, MYC, or BCL6. In addition, MYD88 mutations were more frequently present in LT than in NOS subtypes. Interestingly, MYD88-mutated patients were older, with a non-GC phenotype and had worse OS, compared to MYD88 WT cases. Overall, SCDLBCL did not show, at the genetic and expression level, different profiles than PCDLBCL, even if they bear a significantly worse prognosis. At survival analysis, the most important prognostic factors in patients with PCDLBCL were age and MYD88 mutation, whereas relapse and high Ki-67 expression were relevant in patients with SCDLBCL. Our study comprehensively analyzed the clinicopathological and molecular features of PCDLBCL-LT, PCDLBCL-NOS, and SCDLBCL, underlining the differences among them and the importance of properly identifying these entities at the time of diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36997030
pii: S0046-8177(23)00072-2
doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.03.012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44-55Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.