IgE Depletion with Ligelizumab Does Not Significantly Improve Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.


Journal

The Journal of investigative dermatology
ISSN: 1523-1747
Titre abrégé: J Invest Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0426720

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
received: 13 04 2022
revised: 22 01 2023
accepted: 26 01 2023
medline: 25 9 2023
pubmed: 3 4 2023
entrez: 2 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The value, if any, of anti-IgE approaches in the treatment of atopic dermatitis has not been fully clarified. Studies using the anti-IgE omalizumab have yielded conflicting results. Antibodies with an IgE-suppressive capacity stronger than omalizumab might be more efficacious. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the high-affinity anti-IgE antibody ligelizumab (280 mg, subcutaneous, every other week) in 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a placebo and active (cyclosporine A) controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial for 12 weeks. We found that ligelizumab treatment resulted in either complete (patients with baseline IgE < 1,500 IU/ml) or partial (baseline IgE > 1,500 IU/ml) suppression of serum and cell-bound IgE as well as of allergic skin prick tests. On the other hand, ligelizumab-as opposed to cyclosporine A-was not significantly superior to placebo in inducing Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 response or significantly reducing pruritus and sleep disturbance. Interestingly though, patients with high baseline IgE exhibited a slightly but not significantly better treatment response than those with low baseline IgE. Our study shows that an immunologically efficacious anti-IgE approach is not clearly superior to placebo in treating atopic dermatitis. Larger studies are needed to determine whether certain patient subgroups may benefit from this strategy. The study was registered in 2011 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT Number 2011-002112-84.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The value, if any, of anti-IgE approaches in the treatment of atopic dermatitis has not been fully clarified. Studies using the anti-IgE omalizumab have yielded conflicting results.
OBJECTIVE
Antibodies with an IgE-suppressive capacity stronger than omalizumab might be more efficacious.
STUDY DESIGN
We assessed the safety and efficacy of the high-affinity anti-IgE antibody ligelizumab (280 mg, subcutaneous, every other week) in 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a placebo and active (cyclosporine A) controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial for 12 weeks.
RESULTS
We found that ligelizumab treatment resulted in either complete (patients with baseline IgE < 1,500 IU/ml) or partial (baseline IgE > 1,500 IU/ml) suppression of serum and cell-bound IgE as well as of allergic skin prick tests. On the other hand, ligelizumab-as opposed to cyclosporine A-was not significantly superior to placebo in inducing Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 response or significantly reducing pruritus and sleep disturbance. Interestingly though, patients with high baseline IgE exhibited a slightly but not significantly better treatment response than those with low baseline IgE.
CONCLUSION
Our study shows that an immunologically efficacious anti-IgE approach is not clearly superior to placebo in treating atopic dermatitis. Larger studies are needed to determine whether certain patient subgroups may benefit from this strategy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The study was registered in 2011 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT Number 2011-002112-84.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37004878
pii: S0022-202X(23)01942-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.01.040
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

ligelizumab L8LE0L691T
Omalizumab 2P471X1Z11
Cyclosporine 83HN0GTJ6D
Immunosuppressive Agents 0

Banques de données

EudraCT
['2011-002112-84']

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1896-1905.e8

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Christine Bangert (C)

Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: christine.bangert@meduniwien.ac.at.

Christian Loesche (C)

Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.

Hans Skvara (H)

Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Dermatology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.

Regina Fölster-Holst (R)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Jean-Philippe Lacour (JP)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital L'Archet, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Julie Jones (J)

Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.

Patrick Burnett (P)

Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Westlake Village, California, USA.

Natalija Novak (N)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Georg Stingl (G)

Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH