IgE Depletion with Ligelizumab Does Not Significantly Improve Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.
Journal
The Journal of investigative dermatology
ISSN: 1523-1747
Titre abrégé: J Invest Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0426720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
13
04
2022
revised:
22
01
2023
accepted:
26
01
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
3
4
2023
entrez:
2
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The value, if any, of anti-IgE approaches in the treatment of atopic dermatitis has not been fully clarified. Studies using the anti-IgE omalizumab have yielded conflicting results. Antibodies with an IgE-suppressive capacity stronger than omalizumab might be more efficacious. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the high-affinity anti-IgE antibody ligelizumab (280 mg, subcutaneous, every other week) in 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a placebo and active (cyclosporine A) controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial for 12 weeks. We found that ligelizumab treatment resulted in either complete (patients with baseline IgE < 1,500 IU/ml) or partial (baseline IgE > 1,500 IU/ml) suppression of serum and cell-bound IgE as well as of allergic skin prick tests. On the other hand, ligelizumab-as opposed to cyclosporine A-was not significantly superior to placebo in inducing Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 response or significantly reducing pruritus and sleep disturbance. Interestingly though, patients with high baseline IgE exhibited a slightly but not significantly better treatment response than those with low baseline IgE. Our study shows that an immunologically efficacious anti-IgE approach is not clearly superior to placebo in treating atopic dermatitis. Larger studies are needed to determine whether certain patient subgroups may benefit from this strategy. The study was registered in 2011 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT Number 2011-002112-84.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The value, if any, of anti-IgE approaches in the treatment of atopic dermatitis has not been fully clarified. Studies using the anti-IgE omalizumab have yielded conflicting results.
OBJECTIVE
Antibodies with an IgE-suppressive capacity stronger than omalizumab might be more efficacious.
STUDY DESIGN
We assessed the safety and efficacy of the high-affinity anti-IgE antibody ligelizumab (280 mg, subcutaneous, every other week) in 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a placebo and active (cyclosporine A) controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial for 12 weeks.
RESULTS
We found that ligelizumab treatment resulted in either complete (patients with baseline IgE < 1,500 IU/ml) or partial (baseline IgE > 1,500 IU/ml) suppression of serum and cell-bound IgE as well as of allergic skin prick tests. On the other hand, ligelizumab-as opposed to cyclosporine A-was not significantly superior to placebo in inducing Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 response or significantly reducing pruritus and sleep disturbance. Interestingly though, patients with high baseline IgE exhibited a slightly but not significantly better treatment response than those with low baseline IgE.
CONCLUSION
Our study shows that an immunologically efficacious anti-IgE approach is not clearly superior to placebo in treating atopic dermatitis. Larger studies are needed to determine whether certain patient subgroups may benefit from this strategy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The study was registered in 2011 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT Number 2011-002112-84.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37004878
pii: S0022-202X(23)01942-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.01.040
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
ligelizumab
L8LE0L691T
Omalizumab
2P471X1Z11
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Banques de données
EudraCT
['2011-002112-84']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1896-1905.e8Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.