Randomized prospective study comparing conventional In Vitro Fertilization technique to Intravaginal Culture with the INVOCELL™ device for 3 and 5 days.
INVOCell™
in vitro fertilization
intravaginal culture
prolonged culture
Journal
JBRA assisted reproduction
ISSN: 1518-0557
Titre abrégé: JBRA Assist Reprod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101684552
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 09 2023
12 09 2023
Historique:
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
5
4
2023
entrez:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective was to analyse and compare the formation and quality of the embryos developed using conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and IVC techniques with an INVOCell™ device. Two groups were formed, with eight couples in each, one in culture for three days (D3) and another in culture for five days (D5), using intravaginal culture technique with an INVOcell device and a conventional in vitro fertilization technique. Embryo formation in Group D5 showed 46.7% (IVC) and 40% (IVF) of recovered blastocysts. In the group D5, the conventional IVF, better embryo development dynamics was observed, with 66% of expanded blastocysts, against 28% in the IVC. Group D3 showed 75% (IVC) and 53% (IVF) of embryo formation. Embryonic quality in Group D3 demonstrated that IVF embryos had a better synchrony in the number and quality of blastomeres. All embryos recovered in Group D3, in both techniques, did not show fragmentation. The pH of the medium contained in the INVOCell™ device in both Groups D5 and D3 showed no differences. The means were 7.26 and 7.25, respectively. The pH of the medium used in IVF was 7.29 in both groups. Microbiological analyzes of the culture media contained in the INVOCell™ devices used in Group D5 were negative. The results showed that the IVC technique, using the INVOCell™ device, provided a healthy and balanced environment for the development and obtaining of quality embryos with three and five days of culture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37014952
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220042
pmc: PMC10712802
doi:
Substances chimiques
Culture Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
360-366Références
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7838):S174-S176
pubmed: 33328682
Fertil Steril. 1988 Apr;49(4):654-7
pubmed: 3350160
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):194-227
pubmed: 26586241
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016 Jun;28(7):948-959
pubmed: 25515369
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Oct;39(4):588-598
pubmed: 31515169
Semin Reprod Med. 2001 Sep;19(3):279-89
pubmed: 11679909
Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-4
pubmed: 19828144
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Jun;22(6):632-46
pubmed: 21481639
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Aug 08;17(6):340-343
pubmed: 35939551
Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):994-999
pubmed: 31843099
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Jun;33(6):765-70
pubmed: 26984108
Fertil Steril. 2000 Aug;74(2):282-7
pubmed: 10927045
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118
pubmed: 27357126
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013 Oct;63(5):291-4
pubmed: 24431660
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:571596
pubmed: 22645435
Case Rep Womens Health. 2019 Jan 26;21:e00099
pubmed: 30733926
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-22
pubmed: 26207016
Fertil Steril. 1997 Aug;68(2):265-71
pubmed: 9240254
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Mar 19;2020(2):hoaa008
pubmed: 32206731
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Apr;33(4):495-500
pubmed: 26843390
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1736-43
pubmed: 16678177
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 10;9:7-11
pubmed: 26085790
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016 Aug 01;20(3):112-7
pubmed: 27584602
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):822-39
pubmed: 24947475
Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):571-587
pubmed: 26851765
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):732-8
pubmed: 26602106
Hum Reprod. 2000 Apr;15(4):896-904
pubmed: 10739839