Matching for HLA-DR excluding diabetogenic HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR4 predicts insulin independence after pancreatic islet transplantation.

In pancreatic islet transplantation, the exact contribution of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching to graft survival remains unclear. Islets may be exposed to allogenic rejection but also the recurrence of type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated the HLA-DR matching, including the impact of diabetogenic HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 matches. We retrospectively examined the HLA profile in 965 transplant recipients and 2327 islet donors. The study population was obtained from patients enrolled in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry. We then identified 87 recipients who received a single-islet infusion. Islet-kidney recipients, 2nd islet infusion, and patients with missing data were excluded from the analysis (n=878). HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR4 were present in 29.7% and 32.6% of T1D recipients and 11.6% and 15.8% of the donors, respectively. We identified 52 T1D islet recipients mismatched for HLA-DR (group A), 11 with 1 or 2 HLA-DR-matches but excluding HLA-DR3 and HLA- DR4 (group B), and 24 matched for HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 (group C). Insulin-independence was maintained in a significantly higher percentage of group B recipients from year one through five post-transplantation (p<0.01). At five-year post-transplantation, 78% of group B was insulin-independent compared to 24% (group A) and 35% (group C). Insulin-independence correlated with significantly better glycemic control (HbA1c <7%), fasting blood glucose, and reduced severe hypoglycemic events. Matching HLA-A-B-DR (≥3) independently of HLA- DR3 or HLA-DR4 matching did not improve graft survival. This study suggests that matching HLA-DR but excluding the diabetogenic HLA-DR3 and/or 4 is a significant predictor for long-term islet survival.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Ballou, Barton, Payne, Berney, Villard, Meier, Baidal, Alejandro, Robien, Eggerman, Kamoun and Muller.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Authors CB, FB and EP were employed by The EMMES Company, LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.