Hemodynamic Tolerance of New Resistance Training Methods in Patients With Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY.
Journal
Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention
ISSN: 1932-751X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2023
01 11 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
12
4
2023
entrez:
11
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the effectiveness of three different resistance training (RT) methods for cardiac rehabilitation. Individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 23) or coronary artery disease (CAD, n = 22) and healthy controls (CTRL, n = 29) participated in this randomized crossover trial of RT exercises at 70% of the one-maximal repetition on a leg extension machine. Peak heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured noninvasively. The three RT methods were five sets of increasing repetitions from three to seven (RISE), of decreasing repetitions from seven to three (DROP), and three sets of nine repetitions (USUAL). Interset rest intervals were 15 sec for RISE and DROP and 60 sec for USUAL. Peak HR differed on average by <4 bpm between methods in the HFrEF and CAD groups ( P < .02). Rises in systolic BP (SBP) in the HFrEF group were comparable across methods. In the CAD group, mean SBP at peak exercise increased more in RISE and DROP than in USUAL ( P < .001), but the increase was ≤10 mm Hg. In the CTRL group, SBP was higher for DROP than for USUAL (152 ± 22 vs 144 ± 24 mm Hg, respectively; P < .01). Peak cardiac output and perceived exertion did not differ between methods. The RISE, DROP, and USUAL RT methods induced a similar perception of effort and similar increases in peak HR and BP. The RISE and DROP methods appear more efficient as they allow a comparable training volume in a shorter time than the USUAL method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37040560
doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000794
pii: 01273116-990000000-00088
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
453-459Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119–177.
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(36):3599–3726.
Kitzman DW, Whellan DJ, Duncan P, et al. Physical rehabilitation for older patients hospitalized for heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(3):203–216.
Keteyian SJ, Michaels A. Heart failure in cardiac rehabilitation: a review and practical considerations. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022;42(5):296–303.
Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(1):1–12.
Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Schwaab B, Reiss N, Schmidt T. Resistance training in patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, and valvular heart disease: a review with special emphasis on old age, frailty, and physical limitations. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022;42(5):304–315.
Price KJ, Gordon BA, Bird SR, Benson AC. A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: is there an international consensus? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(16):1715–1733.
Hansen D, Abreu A, Doherty P, Völler H. Dynamic strength training intensity in cardiovascular rehabilitation: is it time to reconsider clinical practice? A systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(14):1483–1492.
Tucker WJ, Angadi SS, Haykowsky MJ, Nelson MD, Sarma S, Tomczak CR. Pathophysiology of exercise intolerance and its treatment with exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020;40(1):9–16.
Fisher S, Smart NA, Pearson MJ. Resistance training in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27(5):1665–1682.
Kirkman DL, Lee DC, Carbone S. Resistance exercise for cardiac rehabilitation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;70:66–72.
Fidalgo ASF, Farinatti P, Borges JP, de Paula T, Monteiro W. Institutional guidelines for resistance exercise training in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(3):463–475.
Karlsdottir AE, Foster C, Porcari JP, Palmer-McLean K, White-Kube R, Backes RC. Hemodynamic responses during aerobic and resistance exercise. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2002;22(3):170–177.
Meyer K, Hajric R, Westbrook S, et al. Hemodynamic responses during leg press exercise in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(11):1537–1543.
Bentley DC, Thomas SG. Characterizing and comparing acute responses of blood pressure, heart rate, and forearm blood flow to 2 handgrip protocols. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018;38(6):400–405.
Lamotte M, Niset G, van de Borne P. The effect of different intensity modalities of resistance training on beat-to-beat blood pressure in cardiac patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005;12(1):12–17.
Lamotte M, Fleury F, Pirard M, Jamon A, van de Borne P. Acute cardiovascular response to resistance training during cardiac rehabilitation: effect of repetition speed and rest periods. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(3):329–336.
Gjøvaag TF, Mirtaheri P, Simon K, et al. Hemodynamic responses to resistance exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):581–588.
Laurent C, Penzer F, Letroye B, Carpentier A, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Effect of a strength training method characterized by an incremental number of repetitions across sets and a very short rest interval. Sci Sports. 2016;31(5):e115–e121.
Fortin J, Habenbacher W, Heller A, et al. Non-invasive beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by an improved method of transthoracic bioimpedance measurement. Comput Biol Med. 2006;36(11):1185–1203.
Charloux A, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Richard R, et al. A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the “direct” Fick method. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82(4):313–320.
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–3104.
Penzer F, Cabrol A, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Comparison of muscle activity and tissue oxygenation during strength training protocols that differ by their organisation, rest interval between sets, and volume. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(9):1795–1806.
Duchateau J, Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A. Strength training: in search of optimal strategies to maximize neuromuscular performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2021;49(1):2–14.
Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Efficacy of a new strength training design: the 3/7 method. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(5):1093–1104.
Piepoli M, Clark AL, Volterrani M, Adamopoulos S, Sleight P, Coats AJ. Contribution of muscle afferents to the hemodynamic, autonomic, and ventilatory responses to exercise in patients with chronic heart failure: effects of physical training. Circulation. 1996;93(5):940–952.
Aimo A, Saccaro LF, Borrelli C, et al. The ergoreflex: how the skeletal muscle modulates ventilation and cardiovascular function in health and disease. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23(9):1458–1467.
Kambic T, Hadžić V, Lainscak M. Hemodynamic response to high- and low-load resistance exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized, crossover clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):3905.
Hansen D, Abreu A, Ambrosetti M, et al. Exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation and beyond: why and how: a position statement from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(1):230–245.
Conraads VM, Deaton C, Piotrowicz E, et al. Adherence of heart failure patients to exercise: barriers and possible solutions: a position statement of the Study Group on Exercise Training in Heart Failure of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(5):451–458.
Gomides RS, Dias RM, Souza DR, et al. Finger blood pressure during leg resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(8):590–595.