Effect of tooth brushing simulation on the surface properties of various resin-matrix computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramics.
leucite-reinforced glass ceramics
resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics
surface loss
surface roughness
tooth brushing simulation
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
revised:
23
03
2023
received:
17
02
2023
accepted:
24
03
2023
medline:
31
8
2023
pubmed:
14
4
2023
entrez:
13
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose was to investigate the alterations in surface properties of different resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics following tooth brushing simulation (TBS) and compare them with a direct resin composite and a glass ceramic CAD/CAM material. Four resin-based CAD/CAM restoratives (Brilliant Crios-BR, Lava™ Ultimate-LV, Grandio Blocs-GR and Shofu Block HC-SH), a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS Empress® CAD-EC) and a resin composite (Filtek™ Z250-FZ) for direct restorations were tested. In particular, surface loss, hardness, roughness and morphology were investigated utilizing confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and nanoindentation tester. TBS was conducted for 4 × 15 min on the surface of the samples and then the changes in their surface properties were evaluated. After TBS, all the experimental groups exhibited surface loss to different extent. FZ and BR presented the highest surface loss, while EC and GR the lowest (p < 0.05). Regarding surface roughness, all the tested materials exhibited increase after TBS (p < 0.05), except LV (p = 0.099). EC presented the lowest Sa values, while FZ and BR the highest (p < 0.05). Changes in surface morphology were in compliance with the results of surface roughness and also surface hardness was correlated with surface loss. The tested resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials showed a competent behavior against abrasive forces applied during TBS. Surface loss and roughness changes were material dependent and superior compared to a resin composite for direct restorations, while in comparison with a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic exhibited inferior properties. Tooth brushing affected differently the surface of the tested restorative materials. However, the abrasive wear that was induced was negligible. Clinical studies are necessary to ascertain if there is clinical significance of these surface alterations that may demand repair of such restorations.
Substances chimiques
leucite
1302-34-7
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
Composite Resins
0
Dental Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
937-946Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Blatz MB, Conejo J. The current state of chairside digital dentistry and materials. Dent Clin N Am. 2019;63:175-197.
Han JM, Zhang H, Choe HS, Lin H, Zheng G, et al. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:725-732.
Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Erickson RL, Tsujimoto A, Latta M, Miyazaki M. Localized and generalized simulated wear of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2015;40:322-335.
Finlay N, Hahnel S, Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. The in vitro wear behavior of experimental resin-based composites derived from a commercial formulation. Dent Mater. 2013;29:365-374.
Nihei T, Dabanoglu A, Teranaka T, et al. Three-body-wear resistance of the experimental composites containing filler treated with hydrophobic silane coupling agents. Dent Mater. 2008;24:760-764.
Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000;16:33-40.
Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, Ach B, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:237-244.
Angerame D, De Biasi M. Do nanofilled/nanohybrid composites allow for better clinical performance of direct restorations than traditional microhybrid composites? Syst Rev Oper Dent. 2018;43:191-209.
Alamoush RA, Silikas N, Salim NA, Al-Nasrawi S, et al. Effect of the composition of CAD/CAM composite blocks on mechanical properties. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4893143.
Alamoush RA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N, Watts DC. Viscoelastic stability of pre-cured resin-composite CAD/CAM structures. Dent Mater. 2019;35:1166-1172.
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93:1232-1234.
Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:587-593.
Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:705-710.
Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of thermal cycling on flexural properties and simulated wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing resin composites. Oper Dent. 2017;42:101-110.
Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:59-66.
Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater. 2012;28:529-534.
Nguyen JF, Ruse D, Phan AC, Sadoun MJ. High-temperature-pressure polymerized resin-infiltrated ceramic networks. J Dent Res. 2014;93:62-67.
Gharechahi M, Moosavi H, Forghani M. Effect of surface roughness and materials composition on biofilm formation. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2012;3:541-546.
Strasser T, Preis V, Behr M, Rosentritt M. Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:2787-2797.
Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24:732-736.
Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, et al. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater. 2017;33:124-135.
Ionescu AC, Hahnel S, König A, Brambilla E. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications reduce biofilm formation in vitro. Dent Mater. 2020;36:603-616.
Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater. 2005;21:641-648.
de Paula AB, Fucio SB, Ambrosano GM, Alonso RC, Sardi JCO, Puppin-Rontani RM. Biodegradation and abrasive wear of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2011;36:670-677.
Abdalla MM, Ali IAA, Khan K, et al. The influence of surface roughening and polishing on microbial biofilm development on different ceramic materials. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:447-453.
Poole SF, Pitondo-Silva A, Oliveira-Silva M, Moris ICM, Gomes EA. Influence of different ceramic materials and surface treatments on the adhesion of Prevotella intermedia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;111:104010.
Papadopoulos K, Pahinis K, Saltidou K, Dionysopoulos D, Tsitrou E. Evaluation of the surface characteristics of dental CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments. Materials. 2020;13:981.
Dionysopoulos D, Gerasimidou O. Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review. Restor Dent Endodont. 2021;46:18.
Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, et al. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:510-516.
AlAli M, Silikas N, Satterthwaite J. The effects of toothbrush wear on the surface roughness and gloss of resin composites with various types of matrices. Dent J. 2021;9:8.
Okamura K, Koizumi H, Kodaira A, Nogawa H, Yoneyama T. Surface properties and gloss of CAD/CAM composites after toothbrush abrasion testing. J Oral Sci. 2019;61:358-363.
Flury S, Diebold E, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:767-774.
Koizumi H, Saiki O, Nogawa H, Hiraba H, et al. Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J. 2015;34:881-887.
de Andrade GS, Augusto MG, Simões BV, Pagani C, Saavedra GSFA, Bresciani E. Impact of simulated toothbrushing on surface properties of chairside CAD-CAM materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:469.e1-469.e6.
Queiroz JR, Botelho MA, Sousa SA, Martinelli AE, Özcan M. Evaluation of spatial and functional roughness parameters on air-abraded zirconia as a function of particle type and deposition pressure. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:77-80.
Dionysopoulos D, Strakas D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Koumpia E. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on bovine enamel surface during in-office tooth bleaching ex vivo. Odontology. 2017;105:320-328.
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard terminology relating to wear and erosion. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol 03.02. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1987:243-250.
DIN EN ISO 11609. Dentistry-Dentifrices-Requirements, test methods and marking (ISO 11609:2017). STANDARD by DIN-adopted European-adopted ISO Standard, 2017.
ASM Handbook Committee. ASM Handbook. Volume 18: Friction, Lubrication and Wear Technology. ASM International; 2002.
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258-269.
Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent. 2017;67:43-52.