Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty versus non-surgical treatment for older adults with acute 3- or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PROFHER-2: PROximal Fracture of Humerus Evaluation by Randomisation - Trial Number 2).
Hemiarthroplasty
Non-surgical treatment
Proximal humeral fracture
Randomised trial
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Apr 2023
13 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
23
02
2023
accepted:
16
03
2023
medline:
17
4
2023
entrez:
13
4
2023
pubmed:
14
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common and painful injuries, with the majority resulting from falls from a standing height. As with other fragility fractures, its age-specific incidence is increasing. Surgical treatment with hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been increasingly used for displaced 3- and 4-part fractures despite a lack of good quality evidence as to whether one type of arthroplasty is superior to the other, and whether surgery is better than non-surgical management. The PROFHER-2 trial has been designed as a pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of RSA vs HA vs Non-Surgical (NS) treatment in patients with 3- and 4-part PHF. Adults over 65 years of age presenting with acute radiographically confirmed 3- or 4-part fractures, with or without associated glenohumeral joint dislocation, who consent for trial participation will be recruited from around 40 National Health Service (NHS) Hospitals in the UK. Patients with polytrauma, open fractures, presence of axillary nerve palsy, pathological (other than osteoporotic) fractures, and those who are unable to adhere to trial procedures will be excluded. We will aim to recruit 380 participants (152 RSA, 152 HA, 76 NS) using 2:2:1 (HA:RSA:NS) randomisation for 3- or 4-part fractures without joint dislocation, and 1:1 (HA:RSA) randomisation for 3- or 4-part fracture dislocations. The primary outcome is the Oxford Shoulder Score at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), pain, range of shoulder motion, fracture healing and implant position on X-rays, further procedures, and complications. Independent Trial Steering Committee and Data Monitoring Committee will oversee the trial conduct, including the reporting of adverse events and harms. The PROFHER-2 trial is designed to provide a robust answer to guide the treatment of patients aged 65 years or over who sustain 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. The pragmatic design and recruitment from around 40 UK NHS hospitals will ensure immediate applicability and generalisability of the trial findings. The full trial results will be made available in a relevant open-access peer-reviewed journal. ISRCTN76296703. Prospectively registered on 5th April 2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common and painful injuries, with the majority resulting from falls from a standing height. As with other fragility fractures, its age-specific incidence is increasing. Surgical treatment with hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been increasingly used for displaced 3- and 4-part fractures despite a lack of good quality evidence as to whether one type of arthroplasty is superior to the other, and whether surgery is better than non-surgical management. The PROFHER-2 trial has been designed as a pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of RSA vs HA vs Non-Surgical (NS) treatment in patients with 3- and 4-part PHF.
METHODS
METHODS
Adults over 65 years of age presenting with acute radiographically confirmed 3- or 4-part fractures, with or without associated glenohumeral joint dislocation, who consent for trial participation will be recruited from around 40 National Health Service (NHS) Hospitals in the UK. Patients with polytrauma, open fractures, presence of axillary nerve palsy, pathological (other than osteoporotic) fractures, and those who are unable to adhere to trial procedures will be excluded. We will aim to recruit 380 participants (152 RSA, 152 HA, 76 NS) using 2:2:1 (HA:RSA:NS) randomisation for 3- or 4-part fractures without joint dislocation, and 1:1 (HA:RSA) randomisation for 3- or 4-part fracture dislocations. The primary outcome is the Oxford Shoulder Score at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), pain, range of shoulder motion, fracture healing and implant position on X-rays, further procedures, and complications. Independent Trial Steering Committee and Data Monitoring Committee will oversee the trial conduct, including the reporting of adverse events and harms.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The PROFHER-2 trial is designed to provide a robust answer to guide the treatment of patients aged 65 years or over who sustain 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. The pragmatic design and recruitment from around 40 UK NHS hospitals will ensure immediate applicability and generalisability of the trial findings. The full trial results will be made available in a relevant open-access peer-reviewed journal.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN76296703. Prospectively registered on 5th April 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37055816
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07259-3
pii: 10.1186/s13063-023-07259-3
pmc: PMC10098225
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
270Subventions
Organisme : Health Technology Assessment Programme
ID : 16/73/03
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Sep;23(9):1356-62
pubmed: 24725897
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23
pubmed: 18183410
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr;23(4):e73-80
pubmed: 24406120
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010412
pubmed: 27067892
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 03;(12):MR000032
pubmed: 24297482
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Jan;29(1):60-8
pubmed: 25186842
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Dec;28(12):2259-2271
pubmed: 31500986
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Dec;22(12):1737-48
pubmed: 24246529
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1037-47
pubmed: 25756440
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(5):285-7
pubmed: 2789504
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Apr;19(3):342-8
pubmed: 20189839
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):173-182
pubmed: 20554116
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2005;4(2):65-75
pubmed: 16162026
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jan 19;93(2):121-31
pubmed: 21248210
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):329-338
pubmed: 29169668
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1077-89
pubmed: 5455339
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1701-8
pubmed: 24048558
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):698-704
pubmed: 18978545
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(10):1-152
pubmed: 10627631
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):37-41
pubmed: 18036850
Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:209
pubmed: 25675881
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Jan;29(1):54-9
pubmed: 25162974
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15
pubmed: 22867780
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Oct;20(7):1025-33
pubmed: 21783385
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):279-89
pubmed: 24418780
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1):107-115
pubmed: 28053265
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Nov 14;8:40
pubmed: 24225254
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 31;8:437-41
pubmed: 25408786
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Dec;37(12):734-43
pubmed: 18560182
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Nov;93(8):629-33
pubmed: 22041241
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Mar;24(1):42-52
pubmed: 33652512
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):725-7
pubmed: 18767892
Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):977-989
pubmed: 33010843
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):MR000008
pubmed: 19588449
J Bone Miner Res. 2002 May;17(5):817-25
pubmed: 12009012
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):516-20
pubmed: 17463122