Diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting and assessing treatment response of liver metastases from CRC - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Apparent diffusion coefficient
Colorectal cancer
Diffusion weighted imaging
Liver metastasis
Magnetic resonance imaging
Treatment response
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2022
revised:
29
03
2023
accepted:
03
04
2023
medline:
12
5
2023
pubmed:
20
4
2023
entrez:
19
04
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The evaluation of response to chemotherapy and targeted therapies in colorectal liver metastases has traditionally been based on size changes, as per the RECIST criteria. However, therapy may alter tissue composition and not only tumor size, therefore, functional imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) may offer a more comprehensive assessment of treatment response. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the use of DWI in the prediction and assessment of response to treatment in colorectal liver metastases and to determine if there is a baseline apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cut-off value that can predict a favorable response. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed database, and risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The mean differences between responders and non-responders were pooled. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, and various diffusion-derived techniques and coefficients were found to have potential for predicting and assessing treatment response. However, discrepancies were noted between studies. The most consistent predictor of response was a lower baseline ADC value calculated using traditional mono-exponential methods. Non-mono-exponential techniques for calculating DWI-derived parameters were also reported. A meta-analysis of a subset of studies failed to establish a cut-off value of ADC due to heterogeneity, but revealed a pooled mean difference of -0.12 × 10
Identifiants
pubmed: 37075628
pii: S0720-048X(23)00124-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110810
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110810Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.